Cognitive Contamination

On Cognitive Contamination Pandemics
1. https://t.co/V2XSYmloUN
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/4Dm734wmH7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 15, 2017

Lies

@Criminotweet @SethS_D Hey Mike, apparently big data exposes lies and self deceptions. Were you aware of his? https://t.co/BGicO4vfoN

— Rhabdouchos (@rhabdouchos) July 14, 2017

+

If I said no - I'd be a liar. Like Darwin! https://t.co/tb9R0OWK4Q

Thanks for this Andy...I'l have a read. 😎 https://t.co/bbIbiOOucF

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 14, 2017

Royal Society want's a book recommendation

Book reports on BigData disproving the mere beliefs of the world's leading scientists that P. Matthew was not read: https://t.co/tb9R0OWK4Q pic.twitter.com/Ky4BYoANLs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 14, 2017

The Facts are Friends of Science Whether or not Some People Hate Them

I'm going to "Peggy Edwards, American botanical and natural science illustrator " See you there? https://t.co/b5BS0yzsTh via @EventbriteUK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 12, 2017

+

More fair that scientists admit that independently verifiable facts are the friends, not enemies of science. Whether they like them or not.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 13, 2017

Coming soon.Paperback Vol 1 of Nullius (abridged and updated)

Here @faceblindandy @DrMarkGriffiths is the blurb for the back of the paperback Vol 1 of the abridged second edition of Nullius in Verba pic.twitter.com/TvpCUJMOkH

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 12, 2017

Lies your biology professor told you

Blessed are the immaculate conceptors St Darwin and St Wallace. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/sr4qM7AcM0

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) June 25, 2017

+
 Don't be fooled again. Get the independently verifiable disconfirming facts for their lies and propaganda here: PatrickMatthew.com

On Heritage and Sustainability in Scotland

At the intersection of Sustainability, Heritage, Biology & the Criminological study of plagiarism by science fraud: https://t.co/5gYTtOyzjn

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 22, 2017

Scientific Glee Clubs Refuse to Accept Uncomfortable Facts About Darwin

But try telling Darwin worshippers running glee clubs not to reject newly discovered facts:https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jjahttps://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m https://t.co/tyar3ai02J

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) May 30, 2017

New Data Led Hypothesis

https://t.co/77wRjpj1Nn

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) May 29, 2017

Proof Darwin was a serial liar and glory thieving plagiarist

A simple chronological presentation of significant and neglected historic facts that prove Darwin lied about the prior readership of Matthew’s discover and that Darwin’s same lies have been credulously parroted ever since by the world’s Darwin Scholars

John Loudon, the famous botanist naturalist, reviewed Patrick Matthew’s (1831) book ‘On Naval Timber and Arboriculture’, which is now acknowledged by the world’s leading Darwinists to contain the first publication of the full conception of macro evolution by natural selection. See: Gardener’s Magazine 1832, vol. VIII, p. 703.

'One of the subjects discussed in this appendix is the puzzling one, of the origin of species and varieties; and if the author has hereon originated no original views (and of this we are far from certain), he has certainly exhibited his own in an original manner.'

Patrick Matthew (1860): 1st open letter to Charles Darwin in the Gardener's Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 7 April 1860, pp. 312-313 Reveals that the famous naturalist botanist John Loudon Reviewed Matthew's book.

'This discovery recently published by Mr. Darwin turns out to be what I published very fully... as far back as January 1, 1831... reviewed in numerous periodicals, so as to have full publicity... by Loudon …and repeatedly in the United Service Magazine for 1831 etc.'

Charles Darwin (1860): Reply to Patrick Matthew in the Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 21 April 1860, no. 16, pp. 362-363

‘I think that no one will feel surprised that neither I, nor apparently any other naturalist, had heard of Mr Matthew’s views…’

Patrick Matthew (1860): 2nd open letter. Reply to Charles Darwin in the Gardener's Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 12 May 1860, p. 433

'He is however wrong in thinking that no naturalist was aware of the previous discovery. I had occasion some 15 years ago to be conversing with a naturalist, a professor of a celebrated university, and he told me he had been reading my work Naval Timber, but that he could not bring such views before his class or uphold them publicly from fear of the cutty-stool, a sort of pillory punishment… It was at least in part this spirit of resistance to scientific doctrine that caused my work to be voted unfit for the public library of the fair city itself. The age was not ripe for such ideas…’

Charles Darwin (1861) , Letter to Quatrefages de Bréau, J. L. A. De. 25 April :

‘…an obscure writer on Forest Trees, in 1830, in Scotland, most expressly & clearly anticipated my views — though he put the case so briefly, that no single person ever noticed the scattered passages in his book…’

Charles Darwin, (1861) ‘On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life’, 3rd ed:

'Unfortunately the view was given by Mr. Matthew very briefly in scattered passages in an Appendix to a work on a different subject, so that it remained unnoticed until Mr. Matthew himself drew attention to it in The Gardeners’ Chronicle, on April 7th, 1860. 95'

DARWIN'S LIES HAVE BEEN CREDULOUSLY PARROTED AS "TRUE" EVER SINCE

Gavin de Beer (1962), “The Wilkins Lecture: The Origins of Darwin’s Ideas on Evolution and Natural Selection”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. vol. 155, no. 960, pp. 321-338.

‘…William Charles Wells and Patrick Matthew were predecessors who had actually published the principle of natural selection in obscure places where their works remained completely unnoticed until Darwin and Wallace reawakened interest in the subject.'

Ernst Mayr (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 499

‘The person who has the soundest claim for priority in establishing a theory of evolution by natural selection is Patrick Matthew … His views on evolution… neither Darwin nor any other biologist had ever encountered them until Matthew bought forward his claims in an article in 1860 in The Gardeners’ Chronicle'

+

If scientists know to "trust proven lies" but be skeptical of the current "truth" where does that lead Darwinists?: https://t.co/0hvyAOQbkq pic.twitter.com/e0zpXqUBj4

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) May 29, 2017