On the rarest discoveries made in the field of scientific discovery: https://t.co/arzIrYxgzQ pic.twitter.com/YMh3YMZGwk
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 4, 2017
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Saturday, 4 March 2017
Rarest Discovery
The Truth Will Always Out in the End
The Pure Fact-Led Truth:It will always out in the end. Nullius is currently ranked 20 on https://t.co/iGl1uro5GB https://t.co/jkKbs5dEZ7 pic.twitter.com/HRR2gD22Vl
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 4, 2017
Monday, 27 February 2017
Very Important Plagiarists
Perhaps VIP in this Oxford University Press series stands for "Very Important Plagiarists" in the Darwin case? https://t.co/QEWe7wEkpF pic.twitter.com/tI5c8G5bO9
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 27, 2017
Wednesday, 22 February 2017
Matthew Mocked "God"
Home https://t.co/EEQRXGvTPw pic.twitter.com/5r298vGWAQ
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 23, 2017
No Darwin Medal for anyone proving Darwin a liar and fraudster
And where's my Darwin Medal @SteveHall5582 for my research that proves Darwin lied about the origination of the theory of natural selection? pic.twitter.com/BXO6QsiMCm
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 22, 2017
Tuesday, 21 February 2017
What's wrong with natural science?
.@TheSocReview Not whilst esteemed institutions of natural science promote & reward plagiarists & abuse originators https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/FyPbzHl2vC
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 21, 2017
Monday, 20 February 2017
On Corruption in the Darwin Industry and Royal Society
With regard to Darwin and Wallace's replication of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of natural selection.
Ignoring completely the accepted Arago Ruling on first and foremost priority for a discovery going to whoever had their original discovery published first, the Royal Society awarded the Darwin medal, and its most prestigious Copley medal, to Wallace. Why? For replicating Matthew's (1831) prior-published theory in 1858 and for claiming it as his own. If that was not a corrupt act by the Royal Society then what is?
No one is ever going to win the Royal Society's Copley Medal now - never mind one of its Darwin Medals - for originally proving Matthew's book, containing the full theory of natural selection, was read and cited by Darwin's and Wallace's friends, influencers and editors and their influencer's influencers before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original conception and claimed to have done so independently of it. Just Google "On Knowledge Contamination" (put it in those speech quotes - its a simple Big Data trick) to find the peer reviewed truth of what has been discovered on this topic.
How can we ask the scientific community to stand up to Trump's anti-vaccination and anti-global warming claptrap when its most esteemed institution is corrupt?
In 1860, 157 years ago, Matthew wrote two letters - both published in the Gardener's Chronicle of that year - claiming his priority.
Darwin wrote to admit Matthew got the entire thing first - 27 years in published print (in 1831) before he and Wallace replicated the theory in their papers presented before the Linnean Society n 1858. Yet Darwin continued to call it "my theory" and lied by claiming no naturalist/no one at all had read Matthew's original ideas. Darwin wrote those falsehoods even though Matthew had prior- informed him of two naturists who did read his ideas pre-1858.
We know knewly know (Google 'Nullius in verba Darwin's greatest secret' to get the facts) that many of Darwin's and Wallace's friends, associates and influencers cited Matthew's book and mentioned his orignal ideas pre-1858 in published print. Selby - the editor of Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper cited Matthew's 1831 book in 1842. Chambers' - Wallace's greatest influencer and Darwin's associate and Correspondent pre-1858 (he authored the Vestiges of Creation in 1844) cited Matthew's book in 1832. there are many more I could mention.
Nevertheless - even despite what has been newly discovered about Matthew's prior-influence- the Arago Ruling was ignored by The Royal Society.
Before we can take on the likes of Donald Trump's tweets that vaccinations cause autism and global warming is a Chinese conspiracy (here), our esteemed institutions of science must first put themselves in order. We need an inquiry into the corruption that is the so-called Darwin Industry.
Ignoring completely the accepted Arago Ruling on first and foremost priority for a discovery going to whoever had their original discovery published first, the Royal Society awarded the Darwin medal, and its most prestigious Copley medal, to Wallace. Why? For replicating Matthew's (1831) prior-published theory in 1858 and for claiming it as his own. If that was not a corrupt act by the Royal Society then what is?
No one is ever going to win the Royal Society's Copley Medal now - never mind one of its Darwin Medals - for originally proving Matthew's book, containing the full theory of natural selection, was read and cited by Darwin's and Wallace's friends, influencers and editors and their influencer's influencers before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original conception and claimed to have done so independently of it. Just Google "On Knowledge Contamination" (put it in those speech quotes - its a simple Big Data trick) to find the peer reviewed truth of what has been discovered on this topic.
How can we ask the scientific community to stand up to Trump's anti-vaccination and anti-global warming claptrap when its most esteemed institution is corrupt?
In 1860, 157 years ago, Matthew wrote two letters - both published in the Gardener's Chronicle of that year - claiming his priority.
Darwin wrote to admit Matthew got the entire thing first - 27 years in published print (in 1831) before he and Wallace replicated the theory in their papers presented before the Linnean Society n 1858. Yet Darwin continued to call it "my theory" and lied by claiming no naturalist/no one at all had read Matthew's original ideas. Darwin wrote those falsehoods even though Matthew had prior- informed him of two naturists who did read his ideas pre-1858.
We know knewly know (Google 'Nullius in verba Darwin's greatest secret' to get the facts) that many of Darwin's and Wallace's friends, associates and influencers cited Matthew's book and mentioned his orignal ideas pre-1858 in published print. Selby - the editor of Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper cited Matthew's 1831 book in 1842. Chambers' - Wallace's greatest influencer and Darwin's associate and Correspondent pre-1858 (he authored the Vestiges of Creation in 1844) cited Matthew's book in 1832. there are many more I could mention.
Nevertheless - even despite what has been newly discovered about Matthew's prior-influence- the Arago Ruling was ignored by The Royal Society.
Before we can take on the likes of Donald Trump's tweets that vaccinations cause autism and global warming is a Chinese conspiracy (here), our esteemed institutions of science must first put themselves in order. We need an inquiry into the corruption that is the so-called Darwin Industry.
Sunday, 19 February 2017
Darwin the Cowardly Plagiarist
https://t.co/dnLJaZ3vZF pic.twitter.com/bzGgmpGG1k
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017
On Corruption in the Darwin Industry
++Oxford University Press: "We have a problem"
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 22, 2017
The Royal Society" "What now?"
Oxford Uni Press: "It's with the truth"https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/gHY7Y2eLcS
++Confirmatory evidence, established by way of a most equistie telling question, that the Darwin Industry is corrupt: https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/xLrSp9rP0z
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017
++@Criminotweet Looks like the v small book was a publisher's compression of other stuff. Not so much corrupt as lazy and dumb, I suspect
— Brian Deer (@deerbrian) February 19, 2017
++.@deerbrian Maybe not when you see it in context of Moore's de facto fact-denial behaviour in the national press: https://t.co/70ZRzXgAuL pic.twitter.com/lgOB3x2LMg
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017
It's time we learned to distinguish establishment cover-ups from unevidenced conspiracy theories. Both do exist! https://t.co/FZs1Iqew3j pic.twitter.com/zG7hn9GxDL
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017
Saturday, 18 February 2017
On Knowledge Contamination
Proof of the knowledge contamination concept as views of my article on that topic march towards 10,000: https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nyGiEg1Ykl
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 18, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)