@BiologiaPensamt 1. Determine if it really exists (Published Darwinite fact denial behaviour is proven to exist): https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/JQTK5P4VLD
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 17, 2017
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Saturday, 18 February 2017
The 4-U's of Research
Friday, 17 February 2017
It has all Gone Trump Shaped for the Royal Society
Going Trump Shaped for the Royal Society @royalsociety
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 17, 2017
1. https://t.co/SBJwPkZ477
2, https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m
3, https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/ijcBKNBkPP
Sunday, 12 February 2017
Darwin Day
Read my Best Thinking Blog Post for Darwin Day 2017: HERE
++
++Happy Darwin Day SUCKERS!— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 12, 2017
1: https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI
2: https://t.co/DotiWqaMkbhttps://t.co/xBGGof5eY7#Darwin #PatrickMatthew pic.twitter.com/lj7s35Dwc4
And to raise questions about research integrity. https://t.co/yksOVd2tEX— Robert Dingwall (@rwjdingwall) February 12, 2017
++
"No one will EVER win the Nobel Prize
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 12, 2017
For proving
Darwin lied and Plagiarized."https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
It's too embarrassing for science pic.twitter.com/7ULsyNTDHe
Saturday, 11 February 2017
Mythbusting
Just ordered copy of this book. I see it very kindly mentions the spinach mythbust @joeschwarcz . I have another one https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/APHQy7x4AP
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 11, 2017
Saturday, 7 January 2017
Why?
"You stepped out of your old life into a fight that might not be winnable in your lifetime. What happened?" (a) = .https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/TDCkW1gapp
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) January 8, 2017
Friday, 30 December 2016
Plagiarism
On Plagiarism: A strangely unexplored area of criminology
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 30, 2016
1. https://t.co/JUd91nR87p
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
3.https://t.co/SXiHqXQlsx pic.twitter.com/kNXfK8iWnH
Tuesday, 27 December 2016
Today in 1831
Today in 1831 Darwin sailed on the Beagle. But.Matthew had already conceaved macroevolution by natural selection https://t.co/ldMK5Ipfqu pic.twitter.com/ljGZ3fFGpY
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 27, 2016
Friday, 23 December 2016
Christmas Day 1859: Is Darwin Drunk Before Dinner?
From Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret (Currently unavailable in full 600 page original e-book form, following the publishing house [Thinker Books, of Thinker Media] closing. Volume 1 of the paperback is now out and on sale on Amazon and from all good bookshops - vols. 2 and 3 are forthcoming.)
'Subsequent to his successful manipulation of Hooker and Lyell in 1858, to ensure that Wallace did not get his priority over him, the following year, and just weeks before defending his priority to Baden Powell in 1859, Darwin writes to Hooker on Christmas Day, 1859, to say that he has always strongly felt that no one should defend their priority (Darwin 1859b). Seemingly, this most weird letter is meant to be both appreciative and self-flattering that he manipulated Hooker and Lyell to do so on his behalf, even if that meant unethical conduct on their respective parts. We know that Darwin had a weirdly unethical mindset when it came to scientific priority, but in this case, one might wonder whether perhaps he had started just a tad too early on the mince pies, rum source, sherry and port, or perhaps he was using something stronger? Or perhaps there was simply something far more profoundly wrong with the moral wiring of his mind.'
Darwin was a serial liar who was in fact obsessed with slyly stealing priority from others for his own glorification. Years earlier he started a prolific letter campaign to try to get Royal Society and British Association for Advancement of Science to re-write the rules on priority for discovery changed so that mere replicators like he could claim priority for the prior-published discoveries of lesser known scientists. Those independently verifiable facts are here.
Below, you can see the facts of how Darwin blatantly and clearly lied in order to plagiarise by glory theft Patrick Matthew's original ans prior published conception of macroevolution natural selection.
The peer reviewed facts of Charles Darwin's lies and independently verifiable evidence he committed plagiarism, to effectively claim independent discovery of Matthew's prior-published hypotheses of the process of macro evolution by natural slection, can now be read in learned journals:
1. Here
2. Here
3. Far more details, evidence and context can be found in 'Nullius in Verba': Here
'Subsequent to his successful manipulation of Hooker and Lyell in 1858, to ensure that Wallace did not get his priority over him, the following year, and just weeks before defending his priority to Baden Powell in 1859, Darwin writes to Hooker on Christmas Day, 1859, to say that he has always strongly felt that no one should defend their priority (Darwin 1859b). Seemingly, this most weird letter is meant to be both appreciative and self-flattering that he manipulated Hooker and Lyell to do so on his behalf, even if that meant unethical conduct on their respective parts. We know that Darwin had a weirdly unethical mindset when it came to scientific priority, but in this case, one might wonder whether perhaps he had started just a tad too early on the mince pies, rum source, sherry and port, or perhaps he was using something stronger? Or perhaps there was simply something far more profoundly wrong with the moral wiring of his mind.'
Darwin was a serial liar who was in fact obsessed with slyly stealing priority from others for his own glorification. Years earlier he started a prolific letter campaign to try to get Royal Society and British Association for Advancement of Science to re-write the rules on priority for discovery changed so that mere replicators like he could claim priority for the prior-published discoveries of lesser known scientists. Those independently verifiable facts are here.
Below, you can see the facts of how Darwin blatantly and clearly lied in order to plagiarise by glory theft Patrick Matthew's original ans prior published conception of macroevolution natural selection.
The peer reviewed facts of Charles Darwin's lies and independently verifiable evidence he committed plagiarism, to effectively claim independent discovery of Matthew's prior-published hypotheses of the process of macro evolution by natural slection, can now be read in learned journals:
1. Here
2. Here
3. Far more details, evidence and context can be found in 'Nullius in Verba': Here
Thursday, 22 December 2016
An interlude in social media with Darwinites
@DISSENTOFMAN @interUNFAO @intelligent50 No error in verifiable facts. The big error is to write fact denial statements in your own name. pic.twitter.com/ethenEtwvu
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 22, 2016
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
What would your sandwich board say?
If everyone had to wear a billboard for one day every year, what would yours say? Here is mine. pic.twitter.com/v6eIQHZHhu
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 21, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)