More fact denial behaviour in social media captured for the historical record

.@Lorienen @interUNFAO @DISSENTOFMAN Read facts. Perhaps you might then abandon the Darwin worship fact-denal cult: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/BLuO9TRfSX

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 19, 2016

++

The words you are reading here are 100% proven to exist. Look 100 times - count the number of times they disappear.: https://t.co/WOiVuLvCho

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 20, 2016

Kindle Notes on Nullius

Having your book on Kindle & Amazon is a great way to share the findings & ideas in it so others cans see for free: https://t.co/7kYjx0QF2D pic.twitter.com/V4GKTQVZYD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 19, 2016

RankBrain and the IDD Mehod

@guardiannews About time. Google' AI Rank Brain is possibly out of control: https://t.co/jt4VaEwOUz pic.twitter.com/NP0jMsHEMk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 18, 2016

++

Google's racist RankBrain now likely to be regulated by the UK government

1. https://t.co/nG7VeWlhyD

2. https://t.co/o32zkwE6JL pic.twitter.com/shlpCFXmbX

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 18, 2016

Blame it on the Pseudo Skeptical Zombie Sheep Herders

My resolution for 2017? I'm simply blaming everything that is bad on the credulous & incurious zombie horde & their pseudo-skeptical leaders pic.twitter.com/nH2Eo1e1Oa

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

The Problematic Darwinian Defence of Multiple Coincidence

When it comes to the problem of a supposedly independent replication of a prior published discovery, science cannot tell us how many coincidences sum to a number that would  render the replicator's defence of multiple coincidence improbable. Moreover, how many routes for knowledge contamination sum to a number that makes it more likely than not that at least one was taken? HERE   

Attention @sherlockmichael @DISSENTOFMAN @TakeThatDarwin @Lorienen @Jackthelad1947 @SamHarrisOrg https://t.co/JEaSsXeRwy

— HUMANIST (@interUNFAO) December 18, 2016

++

Calculating improbable multiple coincidence in independent discovery replication. Science problem requires solution https://t.co/tjS3g9kZ25 pic.twitter.com/xuwGIgk5N2

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

++
Nullius in Verba': On sale HERE.    The ideal present for the genuine scientist, skeptic, historian or sociologist.

Darwin is not the Messiah He was a very naughty boy.

He is not the Messiah! He's a very naughty plagiarist! :

1. https://t.co/P7Q3T3Nx5C

2. https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ pic.twitter.com/R9WAS2HO62

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

++

https://t.co/zKERi4J1M0 pic.twitter.com/7BWzD0Hu7t

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

How Many Coincidences Sum to the Point Where They Render the Defence of Multiple Coincidence Totally Implausible?

.@interUNFAO Presenting new & independently verifiable evidence that leads to ask just how many coincidences sum to a likelihood they never? pic.twitter.com/uAjKyoIwN5

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 17, 2016

++

Read the Newly Discovered Data

The Zombie Horde

Don't be one of the dogma parroting zombie horde. Learn principles of 'Nullius in Verba'. Practice to perfection.https://t.co/Wdm2URFkpv pic.twitter.com/vR5AgSQ5zK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 16, 2016

Desperate Darwinists

.@TWRaymen And writing fake book reviews when not having read your book then caught out by your publisher confronted & outed on social media pic.twitter.com/5ZeiWZagcW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 15, 2016

As Opposed to Mere Dogma

As Opposed to Dogma & Pseudoscholalry Trusims, Good Explanations are Capable of Refutation with Disconforming Data https://t.co/fM8vlrHPw7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 14, 2016