RankBrain and the IDD Mehod

@guardiannews About time. Google' AI Rank Brain is possibly out of control: https://t.co/jt4VaEwOUz pic.twitter.com/NP0jMsHEMk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 18, 2016

++

Google's racist RankBrain now likely to be regulated by the UK government

1. https://t.co/nG7VeWlhyD

2. https://t.co/o32zkwE6JL pic.twitter.com/shlpCFXmbX

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 18, 2016

Blame it on the Pseudo Skeptical Zombie Sheep Herders

My resolution for 2017? I'm simply blaming everything that is bad on the credulous & incurious zombie horde & their pseudo-skeptical leaders pic.twitter.com/nH2Eo1e1Oa

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

The Problematic Darwinian Defence of Multiple Coincidence

When it comes to the problem of a supposedly independent replication of a prior published discovery, science cannot tell us how many coincidences sum to a number that would  render the replicator's defence of multiple coincidence improbable. Moreover, how many routes for knowledge contamination sum to a number that makes it more likely than not that at least one was taken? HERE   

Attention @sherlockmichael @DISSENTOFMAN @TakeThatDarwin @Lorienen @Jackthelad1947 @SamHarrisOrg https://t.co/JEaSsXeRwy

— HUMANIST (@interUNFAO) December 18, 2016

++

Calculating improbable multiple coincidence in independent discovery replication. Science problem requires solution https://t.co/tjS3g9kZ25 pic.twitter.com/xuwGIgk5N2

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 18, 2016

++
Nullius in Verba': On sale HERE.    The ideal present for the genuine scientist, skeptic, historian or sociologist.

Darwin is not the Messiah He was a very naughty boy.

He is not the Messiah! He's a very naughty plagiarist! :

1. https://t.co/P7Q3T3Nx5C

2. https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ pic.twitter.com/R9WAS2HO62

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

++

https://t.co/zKERi4J1M0 pic.twitter.com/7BWzD0Hu7t

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 17, 2016

How Many Coincidences Sum to the Point Where They Render the Defence of Multiple Coincidence Totally Implausible?

.@interUNFAO Presenting new & independently verifiable evidence that leads to ask just how many coincidences sum to a likelihood they never? pic.twitter.com/uAjKyoIwN5

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 17, 2016

++

Read the Newly Discovered Data

The Zombie Horde

Don't be one of the dogma parroting zombie horde. Learn principles of 'Nullius in Verba'. Practice to perfection.https://t.co/Wdm2URFkpv pic.twitter.com/vR5AgSQ5zK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 16, 2016

Desperate Darwinists

.@TWRaymen And writing fake book reviews when not having read your book then caught out by your publisher confronted & outed on social media pic.twitter.com/5ZeiWZagcW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 15, 2016

As Opposed to Mere Dogma

As Opposed to Dogma & Pseudoscholalry Trusims, Good Explanations are Capable of Refutation with Disconforming Data https://t.co/fM8vlrHPw7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 14, 2016

Plagiarism - You Either Love it or Hate It

You either love it if you are a plagiarist - or hate it.

1, https://t.co/jj27KPguZU

2. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

3. https://t.co/DotiWqaMkb pic.twitter.com/uKTpnUxvB7

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 13, 2016

Good Explanations are Capable of Easy Refutation with Hard Facts

.@ThinkAtheist Good explanations are capable of easy refutation. If ever we find a dinosaur above a human skeleton that disproves evolution. pic.twitter.com/wgAd7rMeZ3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 11, 2016

The "No Naturalists  Read It" Premesis Underpinning the Darwinite Paradigm of Darwin's and Wallace's Independent Conceptions of Matthew's Prior Publshed Theory is 100 per cent Disconfirmed with Indpendently Verifiable Hard Evidence: Here