How Many Coincidences Sum to the Point Where They Render the Defence of Multiple Coincidence Totally Implausible?

.@interUNFAO Presenting new & independently verifiable evidence that leads to ask just how many coincidences sum to a likelihood they never? pic.twitter.com/uAjKyoIwN5

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 17, 2016

++

Read the Newly Discovered Data

The Zombie Horde

Don't be one of the dogma parroting zombie horde. Learn principles of 'Nullius in Verba'. Practice to perfection.https://t.co/Wdm2URFkpv pic.twitter.com/vR5AgSQ5zK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 16, 2016

Desperate Darwinists

.@TWRaymen And writing fake book reviews when not having read your book then caught out by your publisher confronted & outed on social media pic.twitter.com/5ZeiWZagcW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 15, 2016

As Opposed to Mere Dogma

As Opposed to Dogma & Pseudoscholalry Trusims, Good Explanations are Capable of Refutation with Disconforming Data https://t.co/fM8vlrHPw7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 14, 2016

Plagiarism - You Either Love it or Hate It

You either love it if you are a plagiarist - or hate it.

1, https://t.co/jj27KPguZU

2. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

3. https://t.co/DotiWqaMkb pic.twitter.com/uKTpnUxvB7

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 13, 2016

Good Explanations are Capable of Easy Refutation with Hard Facts

.@ThinkAtheist Good explanations are capable of easy refutation. If ever we find a dinosaur above a human skeleton that disproves evolution. pic.twitter.com/wgAd7rMeZ3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 11, 2016

The "No Naturalists  Read It" Premesis Underpinning the Darwinite Paradigm of Darwin's and Wallace's Independent Conceptions of Matthew's Prior Publshed Theory is 100 per cent Disconfirmed with Indpendently Verifiable Hard Evidence: Here 

Fact Denying Darwinians Face Intellectual Extinction

In the Democratic World we All have this Responsibility to Tackle Establishment Fact Denial: https://t.co/MXoXcakQ8u pic.twitter.com/d12PRE9tnk

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016

Find out how Big Data analysis proved biologists think 25 = 0

Find out how I GOT 'EM! in first 3 #FREE chapters. Darwin & Wallace plagiarizing fraudstershttp://t.co/aE7UFhT8oZ … pic.twitter.com/sMrPchnOoc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 27, 2015

Proof of Concept

Proof of concept as 8000+ brains now contaminated with the knowledge of Darwin's plagiarism and science fraud lies: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/D03Knn3feQ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 9, 2016

++

Two peer reviewed articles prove we celebrate a glory thieving liar on the £10 note
1. https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/5xkPjbmQiQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 11, 2016

Can Biologists count to four?

Quantitative research of the simplest kind 100% disproves claims of the scientific establishment. 1+1+1+1 = 4 versus = Zero. pic.twitter.com/bTG9zZ3PXf

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 5, 2016