Unearth the facts that have been deliberately buried these last 155 years : https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/BJXzYXk19Q
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 17, 2016
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Sunday, 17 July 2016
THE PATRICK MATTHEW BURIAL PROJECT
The Tangled Web of the Darwin Deification Cult is Unravelliing
Rational Wiki for rational people— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 17, 2016
(1) https://t.co/3Sca9Jy6X4
Wikipedia for irrational & corrupt fact deniers:
(2) https://t.co/Ypag00SgZM
Take the poll. Take action.
Anyone care @DrMarkGriffiths about reach of fact denial tentacles of a weird science cult? https://t.co/PO4HLYU74Z
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 17, 2016
Saturday, 16 July 2016
A Poem On the Discovery of the Citing Seven
https://t.co/uOpDBsxlM8 pic.twitter.com/qrB3nh5ib9
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016
We All Have the Duty to Tackle Fact Denial Behaviour in Science
In the Democratic World we All have this Responsibility to Tackle Establishment Fact Denial: https://t.co/MXoXcakQ8u pic.twitter.com/d12PRE9tnk
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016
Friday, 15 July 2016
The Psychologist is In: "Next Darwinite please"
Many Darwinites should visit this psychologist for help & advice on rationality & reality https://t.co/TXI1CYH1CS pic.twitter.com/Rg31JGTRvq— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 15, 2016
Top Psychologist Dr Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University in England has read the recent research publications, which reveal so much uncomfortable new evidence that punctures the old myth that no one known to Darwin or his influencers, or his influencercer's influencers, read Patrick Matthew's prior publication of the full hypothesis of macro evolution by natural selection before 1858.
Griffiths concludes that the evidence is strongly in favour of Matthew having influenced Darwin and that Darwin lied from 1860 onward about who really did read Matthew's ideas before he and Wallace replicated them and each claimed them as their own independent conceptions without any citation to their original source. Read his findings here.
Thursday, 14 July 2016
Sound Tautology: Knowledge contamination is proof of concept
Discovery of New Data Challenges Darwin's Story of Immaculate Conception https://t.co/Si2NOFWmBM #Science via @niume_official— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 14, 2016
Miracle...Innit!
@TakeThatDarwin Na that don't fit what they wrote... innit. Miracle man: https://t.co/cPweJHYQo7 bruv. pic.twitter.com/NwPxHhI4Ca— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 14, 2016
Darwin's Ghosts are Ghost Busted
Ghost Busted on Amazon https://t.co/awPnhTRUzr pic.twitter.com/UTbL4je0y9
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 14, 2016
Dr A. Wilson on "Matthew Denial"
Among many, here is just one possible reason for Matthew Denial Behaviour in the 19th centuryDr A. Wilson on the hot historical, social and natural science topic of "Matthew Denial": https://t.co/KXlWT18rDo pic.twitter.com/tIcsNcDdgi— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 14, 2016
Another possible reason for the "Matthew Denial" behaviour in the 19th century : https://t.co/q7tjnoGCLV pic.twitter.com/JtTsVHR500— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 14, 2016
Unlike in Britain, slavery in the USA appeared to be nowhere near abolition. The British Slavery Abolition Act outlawed slavery throughout most of the British Empire, except for territories controlled by the Hooker's paymaster, the rapacious East India Company, which continued with the abhorrent practice until as late as 1843.
Darwin's pals Joseph and William Hooker - and their pal John Lindley (who, it is newly discovered, cheated Matthew by fallaciously claiming another was first to import Giant redwoods into Britain), another employee of the East India Company - had many reasons to suppress the facts about Matthew's discovery. Their vested interests in slavery could well be one of them. The same goes for Darwin's pal David Anstead, who rubbished Matthew in 1860, because Anstead too was employed by the loathsome and murderous East India Company as lecturer at its Military Seminary at Addiscombe, as well as Kings College London.
Tuesday, 12 July 2016
A Single Unified Voice? Just How Scientific is that Exactly?
What's very wrong with this picture @DrMarkGriffiths @royalsociety.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 12, 2016
No wonder 'fact denial' https://t.co/nOpImotkf8 pic.twitter.com/DSUcmdUvJ5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)