Charles Darwin's Plagiarism Tree and the IDD Research Method

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964

Drawing Back the Curtain: The True Story of  the Scot Behind Darwin

The BigData IDD method so confused Google that its RankBrain autonomous AI robot asked me if I am a robot. 

IDD On the Trail of the Darwin's World's Greatest Science Fraud by Plagiarism

 The IDD research method detected that Patrick Matthew (1831) was apparently first to go into published print with the term 'natural process of selection'. Years later Darwin was apparently first to four word shuffle that orignal term into 'process of natural selection' to name the exact same theory and then claim it as his own.

Darwin's four-word-shuffle is included nine times in the Origin of Species (1859) at pages 38, 104, 178, 179, 181, 203, 235, 279 and 280.

It's not a debate about what is has been discovered. It's about what that discovery has done to a myth

 Newly unearthed facts prove Patrick Matthew influenced Darwin's and Wallace's influencers and influenced their influencer's influencers.

Dishonest Darwin Fanatics are Responsible for Heritage Trees Being Under Threat in Scotland

 

By tugging their forelocks to English Darwin fanatics, the failure of enough Scottish people to know that their countryman Patrick Matthew was robbed by Darwin The Plagiarist have already demolished Matthew's country house out of such unforgivable ignorance. Now they are all set to lose these great heritage trees.  

The pseudo-scholarly Darwin Deification Cult now threatens major heritage tress in Scotland by fact denying the major importance of Patrick Matthew and Darwin's science fraud by plagiary @AlberroHeather @LaxmiAggarwal1 @HughDower @Grouse_Beater https://t.co/tKUxNrSgqp

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 22, 2021

 

Why do some universities shy away from the most painful verifiable facts?

 J.D Benal (1954) taken here from the 1969 (third edition) Pelican publication (pages 33-34):

‘In fact at all times the individual scientist has needed to work in close connection with three other groups of persons: his patrons, his colleagues and his public. The function of the patron, whether a wealthy individual, university, corporation, or a department of State, is to provide the money on which the scientist must live and which will enable him to carry on his work. The patron will in turn want to have something to say on what is actually done, especially if his ultimate object is commercial advantage or military success. It will apparently be less so only if he is operating from pure benevolence. Or in the pursuit of prestige or advertisement; then he will only want results to be sufficiently spectacular and not too disturbing.

In a Socialist society the function of the patron is taken over by the organs of popular government, at all levels, for the factory or farm laboratory to the academy institute, and is radically changed in the process. Because such a government can, and indeed necessarily must, take a long-term view….’

On which point, I have an email safely archived from the Press Office of my old university, Nottingham Trent University (NTU), informing me that a dean has insisted my prestigiously fully funded (by the UK National Lottery Heritage Fund) trip to disseminate my published and expert peer reviewed research findings on Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory remove any mention of NTU from a Scottish press release on the matter.

This is how disruptive new breakthroughs are supressed by the zombie horde of anti-academic vacuous - managerialist gimp - dullards. 

Nullius in Verba is going to be up-dated and re-published this year

 A science publisher is going to re-publish the original 500 page e-book 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret' as a hardback, paper back and e-book. 

This bombshell of a book will be re-titled to make it more appealing to a wider readership. The book will be updated to include support for the independently verifiable new findings in it by top academics.

 The new book will also provide fully evidenced accounts of pseudo scholarly idiotic censorship fact denial/deletion behaviour of Wikipedia editors, running-scared utter nonsense written about it by two senior historians of science who have not even read it, resignation from a science journal's board of editors by one senior academic because they published an expert peer reviewed  article on the devastating new research findings on Darwin's plagiarism, stalking and vile harassment by nutters, vile abuse by academics employed in universities, research plagiarism of it facilitated by the Editor of the Linnean Society and Oxford University Press  -and so much more. 

Watch this space.

Surgery on Charles Darwin

 Charles Darwin underwent surgery today 

Today is surgery day.

Lights! Camera! Action!

Darwin, the piratical plagiarist of "On Naval Timber" has had this coming since 1858.

"Hand me the hacksaw, nurse...
....File!
....Scalpel!
....Glue!
...Camera!
...Justice!" pic.twitter.com/el1zkpGtRT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 3, 2021