Charles - The Plagiarist and Serial Liar - Darwin

Charles Darwin was both a plagiarist and serial liar

We all know that Boris #SpafferJohnson is a many times proven #SerialLiar. Did you know that Charles #PlagiaristDarwin is also a proven serial liar? Don't just trust me, check out the independently expert peer reviewed verifiable evidence for yourself:

1. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/mfeC11jZ55

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 28, 2019

On the word alone of no one

Don't trust anything on word alone. Get the independently verifiable data and check for yourself.

Picture of me on the summit of Mt Everest at midnight.
It's another case of simply "trust me" or "nullius in verba". You decide. pic.twitter.com/HnCWRN6vRU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 27, 2019

Liars please lazy people

Why on Earth is this plagiarist science fraudster serial blatant liar so celebrated by anyone anywhere at all? The answer is the same for why the serial liar Boris Johnson was made made UK Prime Minister and serial liar Donald Trump President of the USA

Same way Trump got elected. The answer is that people want to be lied to because they are too lazy to care about finding out the truth. It's easier for lazy people to be lied to. They take the path of least resistance.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

.

Plagiarism of the work of others is not condemned at all by @UniofOxford. No surprise there then. The establishment celebrates glory stealing liars & plagiarists. No wonder then that serial liar Trump is president of the USA and Johnson UK Prime Minister. https://t.co/MqzvLFcpgB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

.

To add to that telling list, I don't respect Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's claims to have discovered for themselves a prior published theory that their friends, Wallace's editor and their influencers & influencer's influencers prior read and cited https://t.co/4HW4hvof5S https://t.co/mDB5D3kd03

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

Facts v Myths

Hello, my name is Mike Sutton. I set up the website PatrickMatthew.com in the interests of the veracious history of scientific discovery and for those working in the field of plagiarizing science fraud research.

Leaving aside all notions of religious belief, the telling question I would like you to consider when assessing the evidence presented here on my blog and on my website is what tends to first happen when the spirit of critical research provides new data that takes the place of much loved but mere authoritative beliefs, which people believe in only because other people they admire believe them? I expect you know the answer to that, and so it is in that spirit of veracity that I ask you to explore the many pages of my website to examine the difference between reasoned and difficult to obtain new independently verifiable hard evidence, and the rational thinking that follows it, versus beliefs in the story of the discovery of evolution by natural selection that have now been debunked by that new data. 

Magical thinking and credulous stupidity

Consider the facts and weigh them against the magical thinking of the Darwin superfan club

According to ludicrous magical thinking of biologists & credulous historians of science, Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace discovered a book, published in 1831, that plagiarized their discoveries, terminology & idiosyncratic explanatory examples, they published in 1855/58/59.🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/NyrMvJasIQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 12, 2019