Hypocrisy and delusional Darwinite thinking

@SkepticNikki @michaelshermer Sorry. No difference because Shermer credulously believes in the dual miracle conceptions of Darwin & Wallace pic.twitter.com/GLCCEhfPqc

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 29, 2016

Data is the revolution that replaced lies and silly stories

.@ARWallace Fction can't replace the hard data that renders their dual immaculate conception miracle story redundant https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/OwLBONm297

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 28, 2016

The truth always gets out there in the end

Good. There you are on debunking the spinach myth. Now... let's see your work on debunking the Darwin myth.. https://t.co/JY3gwIx2JQ

— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) November 24, 2016

++

NTU's @Criminotweet was on @bbcworldservice discussing extremists in relation to the #JoCox murder trial https://t.co/tfWmwZwEyv (10.25 in)

— NTU Press Office (@NTUNews) November 24, 2016

There is an alternative vision for the future. It's one based upon veracity not  fact-denial, pseudo scholarship and political claptrap.

Desperate Pseudo Scholarship: A case study

Discover the evidence-led mark of desperate pseudoscholarship: https://t.co/5htznSFyZZ pic.twitter.com/Okdzw7YZCg

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 23, 2016

Survival of the fittest

Survival of the Fittest.

Charles Darwin's lies about Matthew finally failed to outrun the truth. Now they must die! https://t.co/G8wgu5m1u8 pic.twitter.com/6G1SGeetdA

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 22, 2016

Merry Christmas Darwinites

• The perfect stocking filler for Darwin miracle fans is:available on Amazon Here   
• Browse some of the book's highlights Here    
• Listen to an interview with the author Here    
• Read an expert peer-reviewed scholarly science journal article on some of the findings Here   

Great to see @Dysology great research getting recognition. Did Darwin lie and 'steal' theory of natural selection? https://t.co/5rMplv9zQU

— Dr James Treadwell (@James_Treadwell) November 2, 2016

Those Who Harass and Facilitate the Harassment of Paradigm Changing Discoverers and Immortal Great Thinkers will be Exposed and Shamed for All Eternity

"A leading psychologist whose research on human memory exposed her to death threats, lawsuits, personal abuse and a campaign to have her sacked has won a prestigious prize for her courage in standing up for science." 

                                                         

                                                      Read her story: Here

What we do in this life echoes through eternity

Having been professionally harassed & abused due to my discoveries I see Loftus's story of criminological imprtance: https://t.co/bpgUyVmZXz pic.twitter.com/rZh6hLKx2N

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 18, 2016

++

My own story so far - well just some of it. The rest is far worse and, rest assured, it will be published in the future.

Read just some of the facts of the professional harassment and abuse I have been on the receiving end of  here

Here are the published facts some really don't like: 

1. Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret

2. On Knowledge Contamination 

Darwin might well have gorged on owl during one of his Glutton Club dinners

Charles Darwin ate my owl : https://t.co/VyRrxtG9Lf pic.twitter.com/epDDpCEYdO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 17, 2016

Rattling windows and shaking doors

Re The Royal Society: Public Vote on Darwin's priority being set below Patrick Matthew's:https://t.co/oJ7yZgy2iz pic.twitter.com/BPaw95HIBN

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 17, 2016

Truth, Just like Gravity, is Not a Social Construct

"Post-truth" is the OEDs word of the year, because truth, like gravity, is not a post modernist social construction https://t.co/LgpRGigKnL pic.twitter.com/phyVDym5Ir

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 16, 2016

Laughing at Mockery, Tautology and the Bellman's Fallacy

Get the low-down on mockery, tautology and the "Bellman's Fallacy". Here: https://t.co/iAnfYaOf8F pic.twitter.com/vSKZvNqRpZ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 16, 2016

The BBC is not aware of the New Data yet. But they will be.

@Silverwriter Thanks. @BBCEarth historic data Wallace & Darwin probably read Matthew's Prior-published theory & lied https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/tkWX2xLOlD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 15, 2016

More Wiki Stupidity

Never having mistaken me for a hat, you may have mistaken me for a copy of the Origin of Species. Thankfully no more https://t.co/PmcPoLehB6 pic.twitter.com/BUc2qnb3Xa

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 14, 2016

Comments Section of: "No Fuller than Complete: Darwin’s Age Comes to an End", by Gregory Sandstrom

The truth will always out in the end. But not before disgracefully fraudulent, fact denying and fact deleting Darwinitis have spree-shot themsleves in the butt-tocks for all eternity. 

See the facts getting out in the comments on this esteemed blog site: https://social-epistemology.com/2016/11/09/no-fuller-than-complete-darwins-age-comes-to-an-end-gregory-sandstrom/#comment-70960

My comment in conversation with Gregory Sandstrom: 

Dysology November 13, 2016 at 6:23 pm

Your comment will appear after being approved.

Etymology re Matthew and Darwin is correct now Gregory.

The “too bad Matthew never knew what he had” argument is a popular Darwinite “guilt neutralization by proxy” tactic that is rather similar to con-man thieves who say of their victim “poor sucker never knew what he had”.

In fact, the evidence suggests Matthew knew exactly what he conceived and so did others many years pre-1858. The evidence he knew what he had is that others did in the first half of the 19th century, and they communicated with hm about it. For example, in Matthew’s second 1860 letter to the Gardener’s Chronicle. he plainly informed Darwin (1) That a professor naturalist of an eminent university read and understood fully what Matthew conceived and yet was afraid to teach it to his students, or mention it elsewhere, for fear of pillory punishment. (2) That for the same reason (Matthew’s scientific trespass on natural divinity) his book was banned for being heretical by the public lending library of Perth in Scotland (Matthew called it by its nick-name "the Fair City"). All these details are fully cited in my peer reviewed 2016 article “On Knowledge contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis” Here: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05.

For the very same reasons of fear of being prosecuted and persecuted for heresy Robert Chambers (who cited Matthew’s book in 1832) anonymously authored the best selling “Vestiges of Creation” – the book which put evolution in the air and paved the way for public acceptance of Darwin’s (1859) ‘Origin of Species'.

Moreover, other reviewers also knew the heresy of Matthew’s bombshell origination as early as 1831. The following text is from 1831 the anonymous review of Matthew’s 1831 book by the United Services Journal :

“But we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature or on the outrages committed upon reason and justice by our burthens of hereditary nobility entailed property and insane enactments.”

An agenda Wikipedia editor operating under the name “Dave Souza” on the Patrick Matthew page keeps deleting the citation to the source of above fact under the fraudulent claim that it does not exist! Proof it does exist in the publication record, and proof of the desperate lengths Darwinians are going to to delete the New Data facts can be found here: https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=23792,23792. Yet Wikipedia will not allow anyone to enter that fact on its Patrick Matthew page. In this way the greatest science fraud in history continues.

Darwinists will go to any length to hide the facts. I have many more examples.

Mike

Errol Jones

.Scot emigree @C_MAlexander @TheScotsman @heraldscotland 3rd great Granddaughter Patrick Matthew passed away Friday: https://t.co/UcvzXEORDe pic.twitter.com/exFyeW1GG0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 13, 2016

Veracity Counter Culture and Weird and Wonderful Blogs on Darwin's Plagiarising Science Fraud

.I think we need new counter culture of veracity, to provide missing alt.future. Lack of which = HyperNormalisation https://t.co/mHQoLgTVuv https://t.co/vqzF7MuODH

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 13, 2016

++

Two weird & wonderful blogs on what is possibly the most massive science fraud of all:
1. https://t.co/sDW4VuwayY
2. https://t.co/zbnJjftf42 pic.twitter.com/OvXSStFBdL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 13, 2016

+++

@Dysology pic.twitter.com/Mx8vb9QJ0Y

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 13, 2016

Confirmatory Evidence for the Frozen Donkey Hypothesis

Darwinians were warned that if they continued to behave irrationally to the new data facts that the Frozen Donkey Hypothesis would be confirmed.

The Frozen Donkey Hypothesis is born of the implications of the obvious catastrophic extinction event impact of the New Data on Darwinist professional and amateur historians of science, who reveal by their plainly biased response to it, that they are necessarily concerned – if they are to remain so named Darwinists and not be re-born Matthewists – with ignoring the rational implications of the new disconfirming hard evidence for their prior soft knowledge beliefs in their namesake’s “independent” discovery of a prior published hypothesis that was read, and the book containing it cited, by naturalists who were Darwin’s admitted influencers and associates and correspondents- even though Darwin himself fallaciously wrote in 1860 that no naturalist known to him had read it.

See more on the hypothesis here. 
See more on the New Data - here.

.@risengrisha @Yestoitok @DiscoveryCSC Thanks. Darwinites were warned of sadly inevitable Frozen Donkey Hypothesis: https://t.co/TnMtwezQbo pic.twitter.com/rmCPKtUvE9

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 12, 2016

Charles Darwin and the Daleks

The #Daleks have always been involved in holding back scientific progresshttps://t.co/WSHCuYYrBE pic.twitter.com/lKmtIdt8nE

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 12, 2016

Excellent Research Resource Repository

 Here you will find a number of peer reviewed articles that examine the question of Darwin's originality and science fraud by plagiarism : https://core.ac.uk/display/30649866

A truly excellent resource!

Desperate Darwinite Fairy Tale Telling and Shameless Fact Deletion

WIKIPEDIA EDITOR FRAUD
(1) Proof IT exits: https://t.co/HNpOaVkZIR
(2) Proof of Wikipedia's dishonest fact deletion: https://t.co/MD18ID52O5 pic.twitter.com/TfMpBNp7F4

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016

++

.Silly Billy @TakeThatDarwin @Colossis2 Darwinists tell fairytales about facts. Read conclusions of REAL sceintists https://t.co/9VxVcVPCUq pic.twitter.com/1a9HJPJ1JM

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016

More on Robert Chambers

Anonymous scare the establishment today. In first half of the 19h century one anonymously authored book did the same https://t.co/3v9BLiOAvQ pic.twitter.com/K3k4U2DNj7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 5, 2016

In my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" I originally

revealed the New Data that bust the 155 year old expert 'knowledge claim' that no naturalist and no one known to Darwin read Matthew's (1831) prior-published original hypothesis of macroevolution by natural selection before Darwin and Wallace replicated it and failed to cite Matthew. Darwin excused that failure by claiming he independently conceived it and that no naturalist, and no one at all read Matthew's original ideas before 1860.

Darwin lied, because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that two naturalists had read his ideas and that his book was banned by Perth Library for its heresy on the origin of species. In reality, Nullius reveals 25 people cited Matthew pre-Darwin's and Wallace's replications of 1858, four were known to Darwin, he was influenced by three of them and one was the editor of Wallace's famous 1855 Sarawak paper on evolution. One was Robert Loudon - who edited two of Blyth's influential pre-1858 papers on natural selection. Blyth was Darwin's most prolific correspondent and informant. Loudon was a close friend of William Hooker - the father of Darwin's best friend, the highly influential botanist Joseph Hooker. Loudon had written in 1832 that Matthew appeared to have something orignal to say "on the origin of species" no less! Another naturalist who read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858 was Robert Chambers. He did so in 1832, and in the following decade went on to write The Vestiges of Creation - the book that "put evolution in the air" in the mid 19th century, and greatly influenced both Darwin and Wallace and paved the way for public acceptance of Darwin's (1859) book entitled the Origin of Species.

++

The disconfirmed fact believers of the Branch Darwinians can run but not hide. Nullius ranked 11 on Amazon: https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ … pic.twitter.com/WG6jsT1v5P

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 5, 2016

Creationists fear Matthew and are fact denying about his origination of macroevolution by natural selection

.@BiologiaPensamt @ShareThis Proof article completely wrong & why a creationist has motive to fact deny Matthew's origination pre Darwin pic.twitter.com/v6rPeVmjq9

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 3, 2016

Origin of the term Darwinist

Darwinists think "Darwinist" was coined by creationists as term of abuse. But Darwinists are dreadful at history: https://t.co/X44f4ga0BT pic.twitter.com/qteg5PyxKH

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 3, 2016

Applied Criminology

@James_Treadwell Many thanks.
Two new articles on the way. Meanwhile post telegraph:
1. :https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nKdJd5NHW6

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 2, 2016

+++

. Also by Sagan: @wgugg @michaelshermer @C_Darwin_OFB @WallaceFRS https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/RDg67Fo0fq

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 1, 2016

++

Charles Darwin's Lying Plagiarism Has Dragged Science into the Gutter https://t.co/RvL0yfkMp6 : pic.twitter.com/n88Th5qcna

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 2, 2016

One Stupid Scholarly "Expert" at a Time

Tackling - one at a time - the last bastions of "expert" scholarly stupidity: https://t.co/dLa68m8PSH pic.twitter.com/KnRkb0YUGk

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016

Kuhn was right about resistance to paradigm changing discoveries

Kuhn was absolutely right:

Fierce 'fact denial' resistance to paradigm changing discoveries: SEE: classic examplehttps://t.co/BwSq1I5QF8 pic.twitter.com/FNmfLq2YIf

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016