Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Tuesday, 8 September 2015

The Double-Darwin-Dare

I challenge anyone to get the biased Darwinist Wikipedia editors to allow them to include on the Wikipedia Patrick
Darwin was nicknamed "Wriggler"
 by his best friend Joseph Hooker
Matthew page   
 the hard fact led 100 per cent proof that Darwin lied about the reality of who really did read Matthew's (1831) book, which contains the full hypothesis of natural selection,  pre-1860. Try it. I double-Darwin- dare you!

Here is all the proof you need, by way of reading what was written in the letters between Matthew and Darwin (1860) - published in the Gardener's Chronicle in 1860: here

Despite the fact the proof Darwin lied has been included in a peer reviewed science journal (Sutton 2016) the biased Wikipedian editors systematically delete these facts. The Patrick Matthew "View History" (deletions and additions) page proves it: Here

For further ethical adventures in veracity sharing, why not try to get Dr Mike Weale - owner of the Darwinist - Patrick Matthew Project - website to admit the painful and despicable truth that Darwinists are named for a proven self-serving liar, and that the World's leading Darwinists have been credulously parroting Darwin's lies as the truth for the past 155 years: Here.   

You can also tweet your adventures in veracity to me (AKA 'The Blessed Virgin Darwin') on Twitter: Here    

No comments:

Post a comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.