Oh the triple irony!
Plagiarists are like vampire bats: pic.twitter.com/vsWM3tEioz— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) July 15, 2021
Yes Darwin did Plagiarise Matthew but in a creationist article on that topic Dominic Stratham most ironically steals some of my primary research data on who was first to be second with apparently unique Matthewisms and who cited Matthew's NTA pre 1858 (e.g. Low, Selby and Johnson) by failing to cite me as discoverer of those newly unearthed facts. Stratham even plagiarizes my discovery that NTA was advertised in the 1842 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. In his plagiarism of my original research findings, Stratham passes my (2014) original research data off as his own discovery or else something commonly known. It is neither! It is not enough that Dominic Stratham cites my book, and cites me as the discoverer of other data he uses, if he then fails to cite me as the discoverer of other newly unearthed data he replicates! Stratham, who at least knows what sound evidence is certainly no worse as a plagiarist than arch Darwin industry nominals Joachim Dagg and the malicious workplace harasser Dr Mike Weale in plagiarising from my original data findings first published in Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret (Sutton 2014) Strathams article is a pdf File - click here.
Dagg and Weale have each plagiarised my Selby cited Matthew data (facts here) . They each did so in desperate separate articles in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, which is with triple irony the same journal by descent in which Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew in 1858. How thick are these plagiarists?
Maybe Weale, Dagg and Stratham will next publish a joint article together in either the disgraceful pseudo-scholarly, plagiarist facilitating, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society or in the Journal of Creation and plagiarise even more of my research and do so in an article about Darwin's plagiarism? How ironic would that be?
Darwin Industry nominals and pseudoscientific plagiarists of original research Drs Joachim Dagg and Mike Weale join the ranks of the creationists in plagiarising research: https://t.co/IdoRtTZTeb pic.twitter.com/8ikvkTSoOK— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) July 14, 2021
He definitely was a plagiarist. The #DarwinSupermyth - facilitated by credulous fools - is busted: https://t.co/m9MAHRXqrX pic.twitter.com/1iFZSoCbgl— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) May 6, 2021
@nccomfort @darwinsbulldog Really? So from what other source did you read that Chambers, and Selby read and cited Matthew? I discovered it.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 30, 2014
Post a Comment
Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.
On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.
Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.