Was #SamuelButler right about Darwin being a massive plagiarist? Or was he wrong?— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 27, 2020
If you are not disinterested in such a question, you can decide for yourself. Just weigh the verifiable evidence.
:https://t.co/T8ci2WP98u pic.twitter.com/rxfGAdEHtv
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Thursday 27 February 2020
Was Samuel Butler Right about Charles Darwin Being a Dreadful Plagiarist?
Was Butler right? If you think he was, imagine what he would have written if he had known about the data on Darwin's science fraud that was originally unearthed by me in 2013/14 and published in expert peer reviewed journals (here and here) and in my book (here)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.
On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.
Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.