Darwinism in Forestry. By Raphael Zon (1913) The American Naturalist Vol. 47, No. 561 (Sep.), pp. 540-546
Even without the new proof of Darwin’s and Wallace’s lies, deceptions and plagiarising science fraud that is afforded by big data analysis (Sutton 2014, 2017), the natural conclusion of Zon’s century old thesis is that neither Darwin nor Wallace had a comparably plausible framework of expertise that can be relied upon to understand how they were supposed to have arrived ‘independently’ of Matthew at exactly the same complex theory, terminology and explanatory examples. Click to read .
Interestingly, Alexander Kohn in 'False Prophets: Fraud and Error in Science and medicine' (1986, p.69) notes the following in relation to the massive Russian science fraudster, Lysenko (ironically Kohn unfortunately refers to Matthewism as Darwinism in typical establishment myth-led error):
'Among other of Lysenko's ideas for the improvement of Soviet agriculture one may mention the growing of sugar beat in summer in Central Asia (1943/44) and the cluster planting of trees. Each time the sugar beat shoots perished, The idea of cluster planting was based on the rejection of the Darwinian concept of competition individuals of the same species (...) and its purpose was to create protecting belts of forest around fields. Not until 1954 did it become evident that this idea was also a failure, and the All Union Conference of Foresters voted it down as bankrupt, after a loss of several billion roubles.'
Of course, the concept of evolution by natural selection belongs to the forester Matthew, not Darwin. And it the idea of competition between trees that led to its conception - by a forester!
Those interested in such important facts may like to see my timeline presentation of the reactions of some fact denying historians of science and others to the seemingly unbearable truth of Darwin's science fraud by plagiarism and lies Here
On Soviet Era science fraudster Lysenko & why a forester first conceived Matthewism. It's not Darwinism because Darwin is proven to have plagiarised the theory of macroevolution natural selection from Matthew, then lied about who he knew who prior-cited it https://t.co/lZdfcmSMYz pic.twitter.com/IICxazt5Fq— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 9, 2018