Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Sunday, 3 December 2017

Establishment toadies are stultifying social mobility

In 1831 Patrick Matthew included the social harm caused by exclusive interbreeding and opportunity blocking by those in the higher echelons of society who operate to keep others down and out.


For that reason, as well as the heresy of his book in its mocking of the notion of a "God" as the origin of species and their extinction, Matthew's book was criticised. In particular, as text quoted below from a lengthy and prominent book review, people were implored to not even consider such heretical and seditious notions. 

To this day, table scrap chasing creepily ambitious brown nosing toadies of the upper echelons of the scientific establishment still wish you not to read or ruinate on such notions as Darwin's plagiarism of Matthew, which was facilitated by such brute condemnation and censorship. 

The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine. Here is the proof from page 457 of the United Services Journal review of Matthew's (1831) book :CLICK HERE    to access the actual book and the very text in the image below.



Wikipedia, lickspittle establishment brown nosing editor fraud proven. Click  here to see the experiment and results.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.