On Darwin Fanatics and Fake Science History

 "The scientific community and writers on science are fixated on understanding evolution and natural selection only as Darwin expounded it. They are sure they can dismiss anyone who came before; such predecessors could only have had an inferior idea of evolution. The true history of this science is worthless to our keepers of knowledge unless it elevates Darwin to premier status." 

                        (from "A Short but Full Book on Darwin’S Racism" by Leon Zitzer)

"What harm is a bit of heroic folderol about an illusory past, especially if it makes us feel good about the progress of science? I would argue that we misrepresent history at our peril as practicing scientific researchers. If we . . . enshrine one narrow version as true a priori . . . we lose the possibility of weighing reasonable alternatives. If we buy the simplistic idea . . . then we will never understand how fact and theory interact with social context, and we will never grasp the biases in our own thinking."

From Stephen J Gould (1991)Time's arrow, time's cycle : myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time  pp.114-115

.

.

Top scientist, Brian J Ford @brianjford @CurtisPress_ @DrMarkGriffiths @rwjdingwall @faceblindandy @a8drewson @Hollyonline @philwane on plagiarism in science! Holds up my book Nullius in Verba. That's made my day in an excellent week!

Watch the video https://t.co/u5UcR7Ndb1 pic.twitter.com/0o7tGtAL0L

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 15, 2020

.

On Darwin Fanatical Fake Science History https://t.co/dL7VnUkGWk
The Linnean Society, which is publishing & is therefore encouraging plagiarism of my bombshell research breakthrough on Darwin's plagiarism boasts its own beloved portrait of Darwin = silly plagiarist worshippers pic.twitter.com/D5NcEA0nmV

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) October 28, 2020

.

The Linnean @LinneanSociety @BiolJLinnSoc Society is really stinking up science, with its anti-scientific behaviour, isn't it?

Yes. It really is. Get the stinking, shameful, facts here:

https://t.co/YZsRwK37uR

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) October 28, 2020

.

Are you one of those who still thinks Charles Darwin is a paragon of honesty, integrity and genius integrity? If so you have been fooled by the Victorian establishment's propaganda science myth. He was a serial lying vain plagiarist and science fraudster: https://t.co/ojYWDoDKm5 pic.twitter.com/Lht6Bd7GIh

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) August 31, 2020

State of Denial of Darwin Scholalrs

 This Daily Journalist Article is a must red for proper academic interested in the facts of Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory. Archived Here

.

Yet academics would counter that such veiws were not extreme compared to some of the writers of his day. Zitzer tackles this beautifully pic.twitter.com/isZs2zEnjY

— Melvin Carvalho (@melvincarvalho) October 26, 2020

.

On poetic writing by Darwin.

Have you seen his "Tangled Bank Job?" @AlberroHeather https://t.co/ofXLpbEV7c

Hardy an atheist was he "creator???" Then see who he stole it from - a real God (creator) mocking atheist pic.twitter.com/I9FSpGc9XN

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 26, 2020

The Darwin Meme

 The Darwin Plagiarism Meme 

If only Charles Darwin had access to photocopier technology for just an hour, what would he have copied? 

I think he would have copied Patrick Matthew's bombshell book "On Naval Timber" https://t.co/R3oTyZalfe pic.twitter.com/tswdG4BRGc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) October 25, 2020

Dr Anthony Fauci: Leading Health Expert on Pandemics Says Masks Save Lives in Covid19 Pandemic

 On 25th October 2020, the eminent scientist  Dr Fauci tells the BBC that facemasks worn by members of the public save lives in the Covid19 pandemic. 

I think lethal anti-mask sentiments spread by UK scientists, politicians and academics needs to be seriously debated - to save lives, or not as the case may be. I have looked at the evidence and it has been clear to me since March 2020 that masks surely do play a major role in reducing the incidence spread of Covid19. Read the evidence - and who has been promoting anti-mask sentiments - on my Masks Supermyth blog here

.

Should anti-maskers, during an infected exhaled/sneezed/coughed virus carrying water droplet spread lethal pandemic, face prosecution and workplace sanctions for publishing their fake science spreading behaviour?

See Dr Fauci on the fact masks save lives https://t.co/YpxGo3dR7j

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 25, 2020

Plagiarism is kidnapping ideas

“Plagiarize” comes from a Latin word meaning “kidnap.” Plagiarism is kidnapping someone else’s ideas.

Very poignant when you consider what Charles' Darwin's wife wrote to Patrick Matthew - the originator of the theory pf evolution by natural selection https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT pic.twitter.com/TugMJAlkpk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 23, 2020

So what will you say when your grandchild asks you: "What did you do in the War against Fake news and other utter Bollox?"

The book that rocked the scientific establishment leading the Editor of the @BiolJLinnSoc and a vacuous dullard executive of @OxUniPress to facilitate shameful plagiarism of my research. Get the facts. review the book. Squash utter fake science claptrap https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 21, 2020

Brian J. Ford on Plagiarism in Science and Holds up a copy of Nullius in Verba!

Top scientist Brian J Ford holds up my book "Nullius" as solid scientific evidence evidence of Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew  

.

Don't forget (I'll have you know sir) 🤣🤣🤣 I am also the 103,551st most influential person in the world of all time. https://t.co/qKgiQDbqoZ pic.twitter.com/Qif6A67NdR

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 20, 2020

Emma Martin: Influential atheist evolutionist not even mentioned by Darwin the Plagiarist

 

More on the Wikipedia Editor, going by the name of "Dave Souza" of Wikipedia's Charles Darwin page. He is a moronic fact denial turd who deliberately and systematically deletes facts to protect the biased and corrupt Darwin Industry on Wikipedia see the facts of him trapped doing it in a sting operation Here. This is why Wikipedia is the worlds worse encyclopaedia - because it is run by totally biased hobby-horse losers in a suitable idiot-niche.

Try getting fact denier editors of Wikipedia to publish that fact. Dave Souza - their Darwin Industry fact denial turd -(censors facts on their Darwin page like a Nazi) will probably fraudulently pretend its not a fact to promote Darwin.

On Emma Martin
https://t.co/T8GVWDf9p6 https://t.co/nCkwgxXYoj pic.twitter.com/3cYvk45OrL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 13, 2020

Artificial Intelligence Deems Mike Sutton 25th Most Influential Criminal Justice Expert in the World, of All Time!

 Well that's rather a turn up for the book! I wonder why? 

@Criminotweet Hi Mike. Hope all is well. I thought you might like to know you are the 24th most influential criminologist of all time... https://t.co/InHHOiZcMf https://t.co/6yTsfkME9A

— Paul Quinton (@pkquinton) October 12, 2020

Emma Martin: shared platforms with the Chartists and promoted evolition in the 1830s/40s

 Patrick Matthew was a Scottish Chartist leader. Interestingly Emma Martin the socialist, materialist atheist, feminist often shared a platform with Chartists

This excellent book makes no mention of Patrick Matthew- but tells us about the feminist - bullied, beat up and arrested for promoting evolution over miraculous creation explanations for species. Ever heard of Emma Martin, a socialist atheist promoting evolution before Darwin? pic.twitter.com/0ItzHpC23V

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 12, 2020

This is a good book on Darwin's racism and more besides. Only the author seems to know nothing at all about Matthew. He quotes Chambers and Rafinesque many times however. And we know from my  orignal F2B2 research (Sutton 2014) that Chambers cited Matthew twice pre 1858, was apparently first to be second in 1858/9 with Matthew's original term "natural process of selection" and Rafinesque was apparently first to be second with Matthew's phrase/terms "long continued selection" and "evinced in the genus".