Darwin Day is this Wednesday. But since the unearthing of the new data that proves he stole the entire theory from the Scot Patrick Matthew, maybe we should make and burn Darwin the liar and theory thieving cheat "guys" on Darwin Night? https://t.co/O8hzytSiRj pic.twitter.com/1p39StLLig
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 9, 2020
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Sunday, 9 February 2020
Darwin Day Celebrations
Have fun on Darwin Day Night
Charles Darwin University, Ironically, has a Policy Against Plagiarism
Another Candidate for the World's Greatest Irony Awards
Ha ha ha ha ha. 😂🤣😅😄😀
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 9, 2020
Charles Darwin University first heal thyself!
1. Charles Darwin University misconduct policy: https://t.co/S4ctvotbX2
2, Charles' Darwin's lying, cheating science fraud:
https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI
Friday, 7 February 2020
Darwin's Science Fraud by Plagiary was Discovered with the Unmatched IDD Research Method
Professor Griffiths and I have published on the IDD research method in an expert peer reviewed academic journal (here), noting that Google no longer works very well at unearthing hidden publications. We suspect the diminishment is caused by Google's new autonomous, deep learning, artificial intelligence, Rank Brain, program that now runs its search engine.
Amusingly, I used the IDD method years ago to do better than Google's employees at finding the orignal Google (here).
The paradigm changing facts unearthed in Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret - disproving the prior scientific establishment touted 'knowledge' that no naturalist/no one known to Darwin and his associates and influencers, or known Wallace and his associates and influencers, had read Matthew's prior published theory before they replicated it and claimed it as their own independent conceptions - would perhaps have remained fully buried for centuries had I not by chance developed the literature unearthing IDD method between 2009 and 2013. If I had not done it then, no one would be able to find what I found today. There was a small window of opportunity - when Google was actually committed to its massive Library Project - that I was fortuitously able to exploit, doing the right research at the right time. Today, that window has been closed by Google.
.
Amusingly, I used the IDD method years ago to do better than Google's employees at finding the orignal Google (here).
The paradigm changing facts unearthed in Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret - disproving the prior scientific establishment touted 'knowledge' that no naturalist/no one known to Darwin and his associates and influencers, or known Wallace and his associates and influencers, had read Matthew's prior published theory before they replicated it and claimed it as their own independent conceptions - would perhaps have remained fully buried for centuries had I not by chance developed the literature unearthing IDD method between 2009 and 2013. If I had not done it then, no one would be able to find what I found today. There was a small window of opportunity - when Google was actually committed to its massive Library Project - that I was fortuitously able to exploit, doing the right research at the right time. Today, that window has been closed by Google.
.On #success & #discovery.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 7, 2020
While it is partly true that we make our opportunities in life by seizing upon and exploiting a confluence of different circumstances, maybe even helping to create them first, those circumstance have to exist to be seized upon: https://t.co/1F7BIGdos4 pic.twitter.com/vzETHHmEfL
.Demented Darwinite nut jobs hate bombshell paradigm changing facts that I originally unearthed that reveal they are totally raving bonkers for still believing the utter Darwin worshiping claptrap published by the propagandizing desperate Darwin industry: https://t.co/DE2MMFqIaH pic.twitter.com/G4DtHgpNa0— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 8, 2020
.The exact same thing can be seen happening with atheists who convert to #Darwiniteism and then go stark raving bonkers! 🥴🥴🥴https://t.co/tbczMF32wo pic.twitter.com/9YP71wUHyR— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 9, 2020
Thursday, 6 February 2020
Top fraud quotes on Goodreads
Darwin's science fraud is well known today
Goodreads top fraud quotes archived HERE
Top quotes on fraud on Goodreads: https://t.co/Nv6hUSe5qa pic.twitter.com/3jg4GRTOtA— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 6, 2020
Goodreads top fraud quotes archived HERE
Is Post Modern Claptrap Post-Modern Skepticism Now?
#WTF is "autistic" truth #FFS?
#WTF is "autistic truth" #FFS?
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 6, 2020
If verifiable facts are not facts and a lie is not a lie unless you are autistic are we all doomed to be endlessly flucked over by the likes of Boris and Trump? Is this "post-truth skepticism" @TeessideSitP promotion? See: https://t.co/jyUegMgyLn
Wednesday, 5 February 2020
Darwin Day is the Celebration of the World's Greatest Science Fraudster by Cheating, Lying and Plagiarism
Darwin Day is a Joke on the Credulous.
Charles Darwin is a Nun Entity: following the facts unearthed with the Big Data IDD research method.
The IDD research method.
The bombshell findings on Darwin's proven plagiary and serial lies: Here
Timeline of the proof: Here
#NunEntityMe earlier #nunentity pic.twitter.com/zhxK7AXahj— Fraser Allen (@AFraserAllen) December 11, 2016
Tuesday, 4 February 2020
Timeline of Darwin's and Wallace's Plagiarism and other Reactions to Patrick Matthew's Bombshell Breakthrough of 1831
Boom💣 Boom💣 Boom💣Boom💣
Bombshell Timeline
See the timeline of reactions, including the plagiarism of Darwin and Wallace, pre-1858 citations by agriculturalists and scientists known to Darwin and Wallace, and Darwin's sly lies: HERE
Monday, 3 February 2020
There is a paradigm change taking place in the history of scientific discovery
Following the publication of my book 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret' the history of scientific discovery now has a number of original bombshell new discoveries that rewrite the history of discovery of natural selection:
1. Darwinites can no longer claim - as they did before my book was published - that Patrick Matthew's prior published conception of macroevolution by natural selection was unread by any naturalists before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. Because I originally discovered seven who cited the book that contains it in the pre-1859 literature. And Darwin and Wallace, and their influencers, knew four of them well. Hence it is most significantly newly discovered and 100 per cent proven that routes of potential knowledge contamination from Matthew's (1831) book into the pre-1858 minds of Darwin and Wallace most certainly do exist. The date evidence of this newly discovered publication record now debunks the old Darwinite claim that Darwin's notebooks and private essays prove he independently discovered natural selection.
2. Darwinites can no longer claim that Darwin was an honest scientist. Because it is proven that from 1860 onward, following information provided by Matthew himself. that he lied about the prior readership of Matthew's book and the original ideas in it by other naturalists. Darwin told at least seven other lies in order to convince the scientific community that he independently conceived the idea of natural selection.
3. It can no longer be claimed that Wallace was an honest scientist. Because I originally discovered that he edited one of his letters in his autobiography to conceal his claim that he thought he was owed money and favours by Darwin and his associates for cooperating with the presentation of his replication of the concept of natural selection alongside that of Darwin in 1858.
4. Darwinites can no longer claim that Matthew's conception of natural selection was contained solely in the appendix of his book. I reveal exactly how much is actually contained in the main body of his book and that Darwin lied when he wrote that Matthew's ideas were solely contained in the appendix. Because Matthew referred him to just some of the relevant text from the main body of his book and Darwin wrote to admit the fact to Joseph Hooker.
5. Darwinites should no longer claim that Matthew never understood what he conceived on the grounds that he never shouted about it from the rooftops. Because I show how the first half of the 19th century was governed by laws and conventions that forbade anyone from doing such a thing, and others from discussing it. Moreover, Matthew told Darwin as much when he explained his book was banned from Perth public library in Scotland and that an eminent naturalist could not teach Matthew's breakthrough for fear of pillory punishment. .
1. Darwinites can no longer claim - as they did before my book was published - that Patrick Matthew's prior published conception of macroevolution by natural selection was unread by any naturalists before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. Because I originally discovered seven who cited the book that contains it in the pre-1859 literature. And Darwin and Wallace, and their influencers, knew four of them well. Hence it is most significantly newly discovered and 100 per cent proven that routes of potential knowledge contamination from Matthew's (1831) book into the pre-1858 minds of Darwin and Wallace most certainly do exist. The date evidence of this newly discovered publication record now debunks the old Darwinite claim that Darwin's notebooks and private essays prove he independently discovered natural selection.
2. Darwinites can no longer claim that Darwin was an honest scientist. Because it is proven that from 1860 onward, following information provided by Matthew himself. that he lied about the prior readership of Matthew's book and the original ideas in it by other naturalists. Darwin told at least seven other lies in order to convince the scientific community that he independently conceived the idea of natural selection.
3. It can no longer be claimed that Wallace was an honest scientist. Because I originally discovered that he edited one of his letters in his autobiography to conceal his claim that he thought he was owed money and favours by Darwin and his associates for cooperating with the presentation of his replication of the concept of natural selection alongside that of Darwin in 1858.
4. Darwinites can no longer claim that Matthew's conception of natural selection was contained solely in the appendix of his book. I reveal exactly how much is actually contained in the main body of his book and that Darwin lied when he wrote that Matthew's ideas were solely contained in the appendix. Because Matthew referred him to just some of the relevant text from the main body of his book and Darwin wrote to admit the fact to Joseph Hooker.
5. Darwinites should no longer claim that Matthew never understood what he conceived on the grounds that he never shouted about it from the rooftops. Because I show how the first half of the 19th century was governed by laws and conventions that forbade anyone from doing such a thing, and others from discussing it. Moreover, Matthew told Darwin as much when he explained his book was banned from Perth public library in Scotland and that an eminent naturalist could not teach Matthew's breakthrough for fear of pillory punishment. .
Click here to see the timeline of the World's greatest science fraud.Dare you deal with Darwin's & Wallace's plagiarizing science fraud & serial lies? Plus some of the supporting nonsense from top scientists?— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 3, 2020
All facts. Not theory. Not opinion. Pure independently verifiable facts found in the historic publication record: https://t.co/6XbJ7NaMWd pic.twitter.com/fa48jT2xyD
Sunday, 2 February 2020
Darwinite Nun Spotting in Scotland
Be on the lookout for Darwinite nuns in Scotland and elsewhere in the world
.Invited by several schools, with full funding, I visited #Scotland a couple of years ago to warn school children in the Carse of Gowrie not to be brainwashed by #DarwiniteNuns (male and female fact denial cultists).
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 2, 2020
It all went rather splendidly: https://t.co/FiMYe7JZvo pic.twitter.com/FQt9K6jfhq
'Not all Scottish school children are taught by Darwinite nuns (male and female) that they must shackle their reason and pride to Darwin's whipped and beaten dog sledge of thieving science fraud of a Scot's prior published theory. https://t.co/mVx5NCSG1b pic.twitter.com/w14I3CkN88
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 2, 2020
You may have heard of the Christian Carmelite Nuns.
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 2, 2020
But have you heard of the Darwinites?
Do you know what they are doing in schools in Scotland? They are brainwashing kids that a #Scottish theory belongs to the English!https://t.co/3yfpcA9BQ2 pic.twitter.com/NnpkdvRy1b
Darwin Day
The ludicrously credulous annual celebration of the world's greatest lying, cheating, plagiarizing science fraudster in history will soon be upon us once again
10 day countdown to #DarwinDay - celebration of the worlds greatest cheating lying science fraudster.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 2, 2020
https://t.co/j3PBCHLpwv pic.twitter.com/VCptLibgU8
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)