How does the world really work versus knowledge gap filling mythology

Why do we still talk about transparently absurd pseudoscience? My conclusion: we need to be more curious about how the world really works. https://t.co/eKMrB9iihH

— Tim Harford (@TimHarford) February 25, 2019

.

Absolutely. Newly unearthed facts proving Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace both plagiarised the theory of evolution by natural selection have deeply upset the scientific establishment, leading them to shameful silly attacks on me. Here is just one example: https://t.co/y6D1rl1NIy

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 25, 2019

Wallace the fraudster

Giant bee found in 19th Century by Earth's (joint) greatests science fraudster by plagiarism and glory theft - Alfred Russel Wallace - feared extinct, just been found again:
(1) On the bee: https://t.co/F9ma7mZ5QR
(2) On Wallace's plagiarising fraud: https://t.co/aInM0fTdvH pic.twitter.com/8jhctMg1Qh

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 21, 2019

Wallace never discovered that bee at all. A local took it to show him! Here

Wallace never "discovered it". A local took it to him. Maybe that local showed him Matthew's book containing the theory of evolution he never discovered either, because it was prior published in that book & cited by Selby his Sarawak paper editor & friends of his mentor W. Hooker pic.twitter.com/iiOp69O7Ow

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 23, 2019

Something wrotten about some scientists

YES! How about case where editor resigned from editorial board of science journal that dared publish newly unearthed independently verifiable facts about Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism & lies regarding Matthew's prior published breakthrough. https://t.co/y6D1rl1NIy

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 15, 2019

Credulous Darwin Worshipper Cult

If you ever thought it was an exaggeration that there is a credulous, ignorant of the facts, Darwin worship cult, here is some up-to-date confirmatory evidence for its existence

Neither knows facts on who originated theory. How Darwin & Wallace plagiarised & then lied about originator
1 https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL …
2 https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL …
3. https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO …
4. https://t.co/uDWRdLPKJd …
5. https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT … pic.twitter.com/Vc9Tciw41O pic.twitter.com/jEa0hkBdhM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 13, 2019

+

Credulous Darwin Worshipper Cult

If you thought it was an exaggeration that there is a credulous, ignorant of the facts, Charles Darwin beatifically delusional worship cult, here is some hard confirmatory evidence for its existence. Look at their faces.https://t.co/ZFhF6COVXa

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 13, 2019

Happy World's Greatest Plagiarist Day

Happy Darwin World's greatest Science Fraudster by Plagiarism and lying glory theft day:
1. https://t.co/yZSRhv40YX
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPuYSw
3. https://t.co/7Vi9ijgO3g
4. https://t.co/HTFsJE6e4B
5. https://t.co/R3oTyYSJQE pic.twitter.com/nYBAyUlAOY

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 12, 2019

Darwin needs removing from lists of great scientists and putting on lists of great plagiarisers

Darwin needs removing. He plagiarized theory of evolution by natural selection & later lied about who he knew who had prior read it & even called it "the origin of species" in 1832, years before Darwin's & Wallace's 1858 @BiolJLinnSoc Linnean Society fraud https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT pic.twitter.com/MPrrSKqx7f

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 11, 2019

-

Darwin now needs putting on a list of great plagiarising science fraudsters http://patrickmatthew.com/onewebmedia/Sutton2%20Cited%20Fraud%20and%20Scientific%20Misconduct.pdf

+

#BigData research uncovered fact Darwin now needs removing from such lists and adding to lists of the greatest plagiarizing science fraudsters ever
1. https://t.co/uDWRdLPKJd

2. On the Big Data IDD method that uncovered Darwin's & Wallace's sly fraud: https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO pic.twitter.com/WA038FIjTX

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 11, 2019

Darwin superfan stalker is in big trouble now!

It's about time stalkers got their due,
Here it comes,
About time toohttps://t.co/4trgbdtLx7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 10, 2019

The Linnean Society and its Shameful Role in Supporting Plagiary

Amazing just how much of a role the esteemed Linnean Society @BiolJLinnSoc @BotJLinnSoc @LinneanSociety @ZoolJLinnSoc has played in supporting the credulous worship of plagiarists and proven woo-woo idiots. And it continues to do so today. Get the facts: https://t.co/MDFL9kDbMG pic.twitter.com/9qDbrNBJ7n

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 7, 2019

Darwin was fooled by total quackery and Wallace was a total idiot too: But we don't have to be

Darwin fell for that quackery - hook line and sinker. Mind you his co-plagiarising science fraudster Alfred Wallace believed in spirits and mediums and was an ardent moronic anti-vaxxer.
1. https://t.co/18mAp7rAa9
2. https://t.co/muy4S2llD3
3. On fraud: https://t.co/zflwNCG4Zd pic.twitter.com/IPgwXM4nwT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 6, 2019

Mind you, Darwin and Wallace worshippers are as bad. They credulously believe in Darwin's and Wallace's claims to have miraculously conceived Patrick Matthew's prior published theory (Darwin from the literature and Wallace from the first and only claimed case of malarial fever cognitive enhancement) after their friends and influencers and influencer's influencers cited Matthew's book and the bombshell theory in it: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964

Matthew the Botanist

In 1850 the famous naturalist and publisher John Loudon listed Patrick Matthew (here) as an acknowledged botanist.

After Darwin and Wallace plagiarised his work, Matthew was also listed as a noted botanist in the 1881 Jackson's Guide to the Literature of Botany (here) and again (noting that "Jacks" reference) as a noted botanist here on page 116 of than 1898 Biographical Index of British and Irish Botanists, in which the authors of that guide write in its preface that they excluded inclusion of obscure or trivial writers on the topic).

In order to get away with plagiarising Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural slection, the proven serial liar and plagiarist Charles Darwin, however, slyly portrayed Matthew as an obscure Scottish writer on forest trees. Despite the ridiculous myth perpetuated by cult-like credulous Darwin worshipers, the reality is that  Matthew enjoyed an international reputation as a noted botanist and expert on the topic of hybridizing and cultivating fruit trees.