Big Data Makes Social Science More Palatable to Other Scientists

The @URealists and other social scientists are aware that #BigData and associated #AI has changed everything and will impact hugely in academia. Most have not yet realised this. They are blind to what is already here. Because? https://t.co/zNoi4C74WH

See https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 26, 2018

Science Fraud by Plagiarism: Darwin the serial liar

(Q) Which of the 3 perpetrated the greatest science fraud by glory stealing plagiary ever detected?
(A) Darwin (#BigData discovery) https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/dtR7sykJRx

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 19, 2018

A message for nasty harassing pseudo scholarly neerdowell Darwin worshipping nutjob troll cyberstalkers everywhere. Howdya like dem apples?

Watch “Only Pigs Know What this Pig is Saying to Them Before it Laughs” on #Vimeo https://t.co/kbHfBxwmgd

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 24, 2018

Ideas spread like viruses

On"Everybody Lies" @SethS_D You might find this discovery made with Google #BigData interesting. Adds another example to your important discoveries about BigData unearthing terrible things about us
1. https://t.co/yZSRhuMq7p
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
3. https://t.co/R3oTyZalfe pic.twitter.com/ccJUpl8jk0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 17, 2018

-

Just Google "on knowledge contamination" to see how #BigData affirms this fact "Ideas spread—sometimes slowly; ot... https://t.co/DLlxVKqJWK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 17, 2018

Giant redwood tree stripped of its bark

In 1855 they skinned a giant redwood tree. Today, in Scotland some of the magnificent trees are being felled to help expand a quarry. So #WhereIsSwampy? https://t.co/EjEcRBFXQN pic.twitter.com/wKe9zoejnd

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 14, 2018

This terrible: Darwin is a proven liar and plagiarist

According to all definitions of the word, and as supported by the independently verifiable facts of the historic publication record (newly unearthed with #BigData technology), Charles #Darwin was a plagiarist. Perhaps the worst plagiarist in the history of scientific discovery. pic.twitter.com/ilH8LsiNeM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 10, 2018

On Steven J. Gould

Fine sentiments. However, it must be said that Gould himself made errors along the very same credulous lines. He sometimes just simply made stuff up and then he insisted it was factual in criticism of others because he thought was possibly true. #BigData analysis proves him wrong pic.twitter.com/kpETWbQi4u

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) September 10, 2018

Digital Afterlife

The #DigitalAfterlife @philwane and re-discovered grave of #PatrickMatthew - The actual (as opposed to Darwin - the lying and plagiarizing science fraudster https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL ) 1831 originator of the the theory of evolution by natural selection: https://t.co/2DnSwbI0HO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2018

Newly Unearthed Facts can Drive Vulnerable Neerdowells Obsessively Raving Bonkers. Slap a Nasty Jealous Little Cyberstalking Monkey Hard on the Head with the Law

Any nation's excellent universities engage with uncomfortable new verifiable discoveries / ideas to stand up for them & their discoverers. Unless they do so, human knowledge will atrophy & progress in many areas will be halted. Book burning may even follow https://t.co/CKTMM2Uttn pic.twitter.com/r0fIfPY7vD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2018

+

Wikipedia has a page on cyberstalking. https://t.co/AABt40p7b4 But of course, one thing it does not have on that page is that criminal cyberstalkers actually publish fake information on Wikipedia as part of their demented monkey offending. Thankfully, the law is clear & hits hard pic.twitter.com/k7gst5QZ42

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 8, 2018

+

Darwin is a proven liar and glory thieving plagiarist

#Darwin is a 100 percent proven liar. Put your hand over this text sample of his lies 100 times. Remove it. See his lies never ever disappear. Try it a million times. Same result. Billion times same result! See the shocking
independently verifiable facts: https://t.co/i3Hyac0KG4 pic.twitter.com/FZeNpP4Otn

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2018

On Giant Redwoods: Another Myth about Matthew is Busted

 

USA National Park Service has now rejected the myth that John Lindley's friends Lobb & Veich (closely associated with proven plagiarist Charles Darwin's inner circle) were first to import giant redwood to Britain
1. https://t.co/EjEcRBFXQN
2. The fraud: https://t.co/8xLE5AjUHD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 1, 2018

Although Darwin, who along with Wallace, claimed priority for Patrick Matthew's 1831 prior-published theory of evolution by natural selection and Darwin wrote in his own defence that Matthew was an obscure writer on forest trees, we now know that Darwin's friend and correspondent John Lindley published a fallacious story that Lobb, rather than Matthew and his son John were first to introduce giant redwoods into Britain. Moreover, the  journal of which Lindley was editor was in possession of a letter, penned by Patrick Matthew, proving the Matthew's priority for that. Giant redwood fame was for years  wrongly attributed to another, robbing patrick Matthew and his son John of their rightful glory on the topic of trees.  The consequences of Patrick Matthew not being hailed a hero, as Lobb and Lindley were in so many publications - between 1853 and 1866 -  particularly when the grand enormity of these trees was brought home to the British via a display of one at the Crystal Palace Exhibition in 1851 -  must have assisted Darwin later (from 1860 onward) in so successfully portraying him to other naturalists as merely an obscure Scottish writer on forest trees. And we know that the myth stuck. 

John Lindley is an interesting character in the story of Matthew, Darwin and Wallace. He was a professor of botany at the University of London and best friend of  William Hooker - who was the father of Darwin's best friend Joseph Hooker (who dishonestly countersigned Darwin's letter to the Gardener's Chronicle in 1860 that contained Darwin's proven lie that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas on natural selection before 1860). Lindley co-authored an encyclopedia with the naturalist and polymath John Loudon. In 1832, Loudon reviewed Matthew's book and wrote that it appeared to have something original to say on 'the origin of species'. That was 26 years before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own unique independent conceptions. 

These facts are not a conspiracy theory as some today are writing to keep them down, because they are all independently verifiable . What they do represent is a great preponderance of newly unearthed evidence that the scientific community kept Matthew down by writing falsehoods and lies and attributing his unique and fundamental contributions to others. 

Get the verifiable New Data facts here

On Giant Redwoods

In Scotland some of these ancient historic trees are under threat of the chainsaw by developers:

Latests news on their history: https://t.co/EjEcRBFXQN

Support Scottish #RedwoodTrust https://t.co/M6FRlk4kiv
& Carse of Gowrie Group https://t.co/lsvYhZKW1f pic.twitter.com/ssFHAenBYV

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 3, 2018