I've seen one on that shelf with your excellent blurb on the back - And its written by a very naughty boy! https://t.co/JNKBGWXPHd pic.twitter.com/2YYdwA4Rc7
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 14, 2018
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Wednesday, 14 March 2018
What's on your bookshelf that upsets obscene and obsessed nutters?
Wednesday, 28 February 2018
Darwin's Proven Plagiary at the Top of Google Hits
+Expert peer reviewed British Society of #Criminology article is now the top hit on Google for Charles Darwin's science fraud by #plagiary of the entire prior published theory of microevolution by natural selection https://t.co/Y37jno6CJl pic.twitter.com/kxZ85AsPLc— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 28, 2018
Like Charles Darwin being proven a liar & plagiarist "I mean, any truth that people aren’t ready to believe sound... https://t.co/Cxoo34kz2Q— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 5, 2018
Sunday, 25 February 2018
Hedge Fund Managers versus Credulous Darwin Worshippers
+Why is it so difficult for us to change our minds when presented with new evidence? https://t.co/p6YRpupXX2
— Debbie Kennett (@DebbieKennett) February 25, 2018
Yes @hedgefundinvest @hedgfundmanager it's because we are not hedge fund managers. They can teach scientists how to keep their minds open to disconfirming evidence for prior knowledge beliefs - Why? Because it's their job. Otherwise they would fail https://t.co/R3oTyZalfe https://t.co/i1s7XSn4qI
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 25, 2018
Tuesday, 20 February 2018
And I did exactly the same to bust the myth of Darwin's honesty about his and Wallace's claimed independent discovery of a prior published theory
Social scientists have a lot to teach natural scientists when it comes to researching independently verifiable facts over deeply embedded science myths: https://t.co/6iRwYlqVLf pic.twitter.com/MM2oFyI11k
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 20, 2018
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
For the historical record: further weird abuse from another professor of biology
+Happy Darwin Day!— god Free World (@godFreeWorld) February 12, 2018
Charles Darwin was born on Feb. 12, 1809. He irrevocably altered our understanding of life and our place in the universe. pic.twitter.com/4cx7z6HKOg
+The only crime is a mediocre criminologist seeking glory through sensational headlines about how he ‘discovered’, in well-known history, a crime for which he has no evidence.— god Free World (@godFreeWorld) February 13, 2018
+We weren’t having a debate. You’ve just promoting yourself using the unjustified claims you’ve made - no doubt drawn to my follower count. When your glory-seeking failed you proceeded to troll me, as you continue to do. Happily, there’s a button for such people.— god Free World (@godFreeWorld) February 14, 2018
+With further hilarity, name calling again? Hmm. I have the help of a top psychologist. Check him out on the back cover of the book that you have no doubt I need his help with. Will you "no doubt" have no doubt he has nothing of interest to say on fact denial Darwin fanatics? pic.twitter.com/3stg9FMTf7— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 14, 2018
Other examples of related New Data messenger shooting abuse can be found here
Tuesday, 13 February 2018
Darwin Daydreams
+Happy Darwin Day!
— god Free World (@godFreeWorld) February 12, 2018
Charles Darwin was born on Feb. 12, 1809. He irrevocably altered our understanding of life and our place in the universe. pic.twitter.com/4cx7z6HKOg
Yes he certainly did. As did The Great Train Robbers and many other famous crooks
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 13, 2018
a, https://t.co/wILiENUgvF
b. https://t.co/v7H5Dx9r5x
c. https://t.co/yjnBYK6aji
Darwin kept what he called "the creator" in "The Origin"
The Originator Patrick Matthew never did. He mocked "God" https://t.co/ZndN1wQtzH
Thursday, 8 February 2018
More Heritage For Scotland on the Patrick Matthew Story
The Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group build upon the Patrick Matthew Trail and celebratory weekend with its next initiative.
Watch this space and their Facebook page for news of the forthcoming Patrick Matthew Museum.
+
Coming Next: The Patrick Matthew Museum!
+
Are you truly a rational skeptic in search of veracity, or just one more myth parroting mynah bird in a flock?
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 10, 2018
Don't be punterised by 158 years of scientific establishment discovery myths. Look Behind the mask to discover the New Data facts for yourself https://t.co/UUpZjTHO3e pic.twitter.com/wOANoD87Aa
Wednesday, 7 February 2018
Further Misogynistic Obscene Abuse
Archived Here: http://archive.is/zBbpK
Image of comments section on the Patrick Matthew Blog:
Patrick Matthew: Originator, Immortal Great Thinker and Proven Influencer on Natural Selection
https://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/Tuesday, 6 February 2018
More On the Weirdo Cult of Wikipedia
+Further independently verifiable & permanently archived published proof #Wikipedia has become an insidious weirdos cult. Click the link to their revisions page about me. Then scroll down to see, they have most strangely recorded my Twitter feed about them https://t.co/JoBmuvsZxc pic.twitter.com/MRqzpB4vgs
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 6, 2018
Many were against working class men having vote. Chartist leader Patrick Matthew originated theory of natural selection & wove it in with his politics. His heresy & sedition were loudly condemned. #Orwellian #WikipediaEditors tried to delete the history https://t.co/PIh8hTXzJ0 https://t.co/vI2WOUEjCD
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 8, 2018
Saturday, 3 February 2018
Bonfire of the Insanities in the last bastions of Darwin worship on Wikipedia
SOME THINGS IN THE PAST CAN'T BE TAMED
Unable to refute newly discovered disconfirming facts for their Darwin worship beliefs, see how silly contorting #Wikipedia editors pour fuel on a Wikipage bonfire of their dashed dreams pretending a peer reviewed journal article on Darwin's plagiarism & lies is not peer reviewed pic.twitter.com/2BFB2u0Pwq— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 3, 2018
Outside the contorted newspeak nonsense of the weird cult of Wikipedia editors, back in the real world, my British Society of Criminology journal article was thoroughly peer reviewed by two anonymous experts in the field, and I had to edit and re-submit it accordingly. In typical neerdowell pseudo scholar style, these weird cultists refuse to publish the independently verifiable proof that it was peer reviewed. The reason they are doing this appears to be simply because they cannot bear the independently verifiable newly discovered facts in it that show Charles Darwin was a serial lying plagiariser of Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior-published conception of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Unable to deal with those facts and more besides they are desperately writing deliberate and malevolent falsehoods (archived here) to deny they are in a most highly respected peer reviewed scholarly journal.
Such deliberate and dishonest malevolent and malicious falsehood spreading and fact denial behaviour is not at all untypical behaviour among prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing
This is exactly why, worldwide, all university students are forbidden from citing Wikipedia unless they are referencing its editors academic wrongdoing and persistently reliable inaccuracy. Here is the fact based independently verifiable proof that the article in question - The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (the article is here) - was peer reviewed (that proof is here). This published proof, freely available in the public domain, is just one among a multitude of verifiable facts prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing are desperately denying in the last throes of their credulous Darwin worshipping unscholarly and unscientific fact denial behaviour http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume-14/ cult.
Here is the editor's revisions page of the Patrick Matthew page on Wikipedia where these facts are being denied with malevolent and malicious falsehoods https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Matthew&action=history (archived here because the most senior of Wikipedia editors have been deleting the entire history (verifiable evidence here in their own published words) of what the one prolific Wikipedia editor of long standing, he who has been prolifically editing Wikipedia's page about me - the very same one who sent me the malicious and malevolent obscene misogynist tweet below - has published in one of their weird cultish silly Billy "chat rooms" in the public domain. Of course, what these poor fools don't realise is that on the Internet "delete never means delete". The defamatory published statements, and evidence of Wikipedia's guilt in deleting the lot, have all been archived for forthcoming action.
More independently verifiable proof from the publication record of malicious and malevolent behaviour of Wikipedia editors, and of published Wikipedia falsehoods, are available in this portable pdf file. And further details can be found on the relevant page on Patrick Matthew.com . Why are these fact deniers so desperately exposing their dishonesty? Just Google "Darwin Science Fraud" - what is your first hit? Here is mine at the time of writing.
+
+@Dysology Look here you supercilious cunt, I told you who I was immediately. Stuff ur haughty "Wasn't that hard for you was it?" up ur arse— Jafe (@JFDerry) February 1, 2016
Francis Bacon nailing #ConfirmationBias in 1620! Via https://t.co/AbHCG7FzXQ #psychology pic.twitter.com/aYCx3Dh4RH— David Webb (@psych101) February 3, 2018
+Bonfire of the Insanities in the last bastions of Darwin worship on Wikipediahttps://t.co/2xpwKujLUl pic.twitter.com/GN8u5w3sQD— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 3, 2018
+Check out this quote. Very apt for fact denial editors of #WikiMalFarm— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 3, 2018
"“I cannot go back. If I slipped I might ... https://t.co/30lLZvUhuG
+I reviewed it. Creationists, like Wikiedia Editors, despise me because Matthew the originator of evolution by natural selection mocked God in a way Darwin never (who in fact wrote that "the Creator" set it up in nature) I prov Darwin stole it from Matthew: https://t.co/PG39CBw32V— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 3, 2018
+#WikiMalFarm .... definitely a MalEncyclopedia run by pseudoscholrly fact deniers called "Wikipedia Editors" https://t.co/UKVxfxJGR3 pic.twitter.com/kIPhdHc2Yw— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 3, 2018
+Yes. I would certainly put Wikipedia Editors of the Patrick Matthew page and their Mike Sutton page in the same "state of denial" lying malicious falsehood authors category as Creationists - massively intellectually challenged neerdowell fools - the lot of them.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 3, 2018
+He is probably a wikipedia editor then— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 3, 2018
+Whatever it is it "Looks like a Wikipedia Editor" #WikipediaEditor pic.twitter.com/jfkvfovKgo— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 4, 2018
+You should not deny facts to make history your pet— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 3, 2018
"That is what history is, the teaching and telling of it. It ... https://t.co/mnflweCptr
#WikimalFarm https://t.co/32V1D5Okvl
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 8, 2018