Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday, 20 December 2017

Darwin gets a well deserved public thrashing in Conway Hall

+
http://archive.is/MXXCN

Tuesday, 19 December 2017

Erasmus Darwin

Patrick Matthew and the Peace Corps

Monday, 18 December 2017

David Icke


Link: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=276565





<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Heh heh. The silly Billy Conspiracy group run by David Icke think my book supports the theory that giant shape shifting lizards are running everything. They are almost (not quite) as delusional as The Blessed Virgin Darwin Worship Cult members. Fun though <a href="https://t.co/P2I9UDoNcU">https://t.co/P2I9UDoNcU</a> <a href="https://t.co/cltlTc2BeO">pic.twitter.com/cltlTc2BeO</a></p>&mdash; Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) <a href="https://twitter.com/Criminotweet/status/942812187608928258?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 18, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Heh heh. The silly Billy Conspiracy group run by David Icke think my book supports the theory that giant shape shifting lizards are running everything. They are almost (not quite) as delusional as The Blessed Virgin Darwin Worship Cult members. Fun though <a href="https://t.co/P2I9UDoNcU">https://t.co/P2I9UDoNcU</a> <a href="https://t.co/cltlTc2BeO">pic.twitter.com/cltlTc2BeO</a></p>&mdash; Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) <a href="https://twitter.com/Criminotweet/status/942812187608928258?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 18, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Thank You For the Money

Saturday, 16 December 2017

The Osborne Brainstorm Myth

Thinker in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology
Mike Sutton
Mike Sutton
Dr Mike Sutton is the author of 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret'.

 
Posted in Science / Social Sciences / Sociology

Sutton’s Mythbusting Protest: Wikipedia Myth No. 2 The Osborne Brainstorm Myth

Nov. 3, 2013 4:29 am
Categories: CounterknowledgeDysology
Here on Best Thinking, everyday I am publishing a newly busted myth, or newly discovered fallacy, which is currently being disseminated by the online encyclopedia known as Wikipedia.
Throughout November I am highlighting Wikipedia’s unreliability and dreadful quality of information in protest against its deliberate policy of stealth plagiarism of information from others. Everyday this month I will bust a myth or fallacy currently disseminated by Wikipedia.
At the time of writing (3 Nov 2013), Wikipedia’s senior editors refuse to cite Best Thinking as a reliable source, yet Wikipedia regularly plagiarizes the original content on this site to pass-off my unique myth busting discoveries as though they are discoveries made by its own replicators who refer to themselves collectively as ‘Wikipedians’. Wikipedia passively sanctions this self-serving fraudulent behavior in order to conceal its unreliability and pervasive mythmongering. (Click here: for the full story).
Today’s blog reveals that Wikipedia is publishing both fallacies and a myth about the word ’brainstorm’ and the associated term ‘brainstorming’.
Wikipedia currently has the traceable origin of the word brainstorm going back only to the group idea generation termed ‘brainstorming’ of 1948. The source of Wikipedia’s typical dreadfully poor information can be found here for ‘brainstorming’    :and here for brainstorm   .

Wikipedia’s implied origin ‘Brainstorm Fallacy’ and ‘Osborne’s Brainstorming Myth’ (on 3 rd November 2013) According to Wikipedia Alex F. Osborn is the originator of the notion of the brainstorm and brainstorming:

‘Advertising executive Alex F. Osborn began developing methods for creative problem solving in 1939. He was frustrated by employees’ inability to develop creative ideas individually for ad campaigns. In response, he began hosting group-thinking sessions and discovered a significant improvement in the quality and quantity of ideas produced by employees. Osborn outlined the method in his 1948 book 'Your Creative Power' on chapter 33, “How to Organize a Squad to Create Ideas.” '

Fact

The word Brainstorm can be found using hi-tech histographic research methods to at least 64 years earlier in a Homeopathy journal (The Medical Counselor, 1884. Volume 8.
page 626):
‘…he came out of it visibly an old man in body and mind, but in no respect a dotard or unfit to manage his affairs in a quiet way. This was a case of senility ushered in by a brainstorm. Mentally he at first resembled a general paralytic.’
And the term brainstorming goes back 32 years earlier than Wikipedia has it. The term goes back to at least 1907. Where it appears in yet another homeopathic publication    - see page 12   .
The modern notion of the term ‘brainstorming’ as a means to generate ideas dates back to 1921 and, contrary to Wikipedian myth-mongering, has nothing to do with Alex Osborne.
1921 - the true modern meaning arrives 18 years before Wikipedia has it:
“For heaven’s sake, Linda,” said Donald, “don’t start any big brainstorming trains of thought to-day!”

References to support the fallacy and mythbust:

Stratton-Porter, Gene (1921) Her Father's Daughter. New York : Grosset & Dunlap. pp 354 and 432.

How to cite the source of this discovery:

Sutton, M. (2013). Sutton’s Mythbusting Protest Wikipedia Myth No.2 The Osbourne Brainstorm Myth. Best Thinking. 3.11.2013:
POSTSCRIPT 2017
Note the OED gets back further than my IDD method on both "brainstorm" and "brainstorming",

Saturday, 9 December 2017

One Christmastime in 1859








+

Friday, 8 December 2017

Intelligent design irrationality

Thursday, 7 December 2017

On fact denial

+

Sunday, 3 December 2017

Establishment toadies are stultifying social mobility

In 1831 Patrick Matthew included the social harm caused by exclusive interbreeding and opportunity blocking by those in the higher echelons of society who operate to keep others down and out.


For that reason, as well as the heresy of his book in its mocking of the notion of a "God" as the origin of species and their extinction, Matthew's book was criticised. In particular, as text quoted below from a lengthy and prominent book review, people were implored to not even consider such heretical and seditious notions. 

To this day, table scrap chasing creepily ambitious brown nosing toadies of the upper echelons of the scientific establishment still wish you not to read or ruinate on such notions as Darwin's plagiarism of Matthew, which was facilitated by such brute condemnation and censorship. 

The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine. Here is the proof from page 457 of the United Services Journal review of Matthew's (1831) book :CLICK HERE    to access the actual book and the very text in the image below.



Wikipedia, lickspittle establishment brown nosing editor fraud proven. Click  here to see the experiment and results.