Professor Brian J Ford nailed Darwin's plagiarism back in the 1970s! https://t.co/aM2GmrWbBT https://t.co/EvF5NXN7O6
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 26, 2020
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Sunday 26 January 2020
Darwinite nonsense is nonscience
Saturday 25 January 2020
On Navel Timber: Plants as technologies and artificial selection
We now know - thanks to what I uncovered with the Big Data IDD method - that in addition to the anonymous citations of it and many advertisments for it, that at least 24 named and known people cited Matthew's 1831 book pre-1858. One of these 24 is the economic botanist William Jameson.
From my orignal unearthings in the historic literature we now newly know that Darwin's and Wallace's friends and mentors William and Joseph Hooker, father and son top UK economic botanists, were in regular contact with William Jameson (see Sutton 2014 2017), who we also now newly know cited Matthew's (1831) book in 1853. Jameson wrote about how Matthew explained that trees could grow better in environments that were not their "natural" habitat. This was a religious heresy that confused (at least he conveniently claimed he was confused by it) Selby (Wallace's Sarawak paper editor), who cited Matthew's book on that topic and others back in 1842. It was heresy because Christian doctrine dictated that "God" placed every living thing in the best place (natural habitat) possible for it to be exploited for the benefit of humankind.
Today - as we enter a new paradigm on the history of discovery of evolution by natural selection that views Darwin and Wallace as serial lying, glory thieving, science fraud plagiarizers - there is an interesting book chapter published on the 19th century importance of Matthew's radical economic botany thinking.
Histories of Technology, the Environment, and Modern Britain
by Jon Agar and Jacob Ward. UCL Press, 9 Apr 2018
See Chapter 12 by Mat Paskins: pp. 230-232 on Patrick Matthew. Read the relevant text Here.
Friday 24 January 2020
Juxtasupposing Darwin's Plagiarism
.
Nah. Surely not? Mind you.....https://t.co/CQnrs6xZZ0 pic.twitter.com/izAkPGaZds
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 25, 2020
Professor Brian J Ford on Darwin's Plagiarism and Fashionistic Fashionism
Brian Ford has written two articles on Darwin's lack of originality on the the theory of evolution by natural selection (here and here). Most importantly, in his 1971 book 'Nonscience' Professor Ford writes (p. 142) on how some scientists are famous not for their genuine originality but for hoodwinking the world they were genius originators simply because they published on a bombshell breakthrough at the most timely - what Ford names "Fashonistic" - time:
Plagiarism is often a crime of opportunity. You can steal an idea that was published when it was unfashionable if it becomes fashionable. #CharlesDarwin and #AlfredWallace knew this. Being such sly #fashionists!— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 24, 2020
Just ask Professor Brian J. Ford: https://t.co/aM2GmrWbBT pic.twitter.com/9JzYAGRw3O
Please note: This blog post has been added to Professor's Ford's bibliography on this topic area: Here
Professor Brian J Ford @brianjford and I on the problem of plagiarism in science: https://t.co/aM2GmrWbBT pic.twitter.com/Enk5GImkhj
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 26, 2020
Thursday 23 January 2020
The Nullius in Verba bombshell paradigm change
The IDD research method dropped Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret on the fanatical fantasy land of Darwin Word and followed it up with a second bombshell named On Knowledge Contamination.
.
Science historian Ton Munnich presents a lecture on Darwin's serial lying & plagiarizing science fraud of Patrick Matthew's theory
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 23, 2020
WORLD-WIDE WE ARE WITNESSING A PARADIGM CHANGE IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY OF THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT THEORY https://t.co/1yKrdGxGEk
The Darwin and Wallace Paradigm Change in Science
.Read about the Darwin and Wallace major paradigm change in science . From honest genius discoverers to newly proven serial-lying science fraudsters by plagiarism— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 23, 2020
1. https://t.co/Wi00AG9SgM
2. https://t.co/I8BK3UCf8x
3. https://t.co/R3oTyZalfe
4. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/rMg0IYDVfq
Image below shows best definition of a conspiracy theory that I know of. This is useful for debunking sly anti-scientific claims of those struggling against paradigm change that independent verifiable newly unearthed facts are a conspiracy theory: https://t.co/kabBo0HagA https://t.co/xE6v0cyQ85 pic.twitter.com/dNxilm3oZG
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 23, 2020
Wednesday 22 January 2020
Darwin Cult
This is the book that the #DarwinWorshipperCult is going totally mental about:
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 22, 2020
Review: https://t.co/zsCGoVQ1X1
See the mentalist anti-scientific #cultish #idiots behaviour: https://t.co/iN1Cm6ILkc pic.twitter.com/UfuTCH9nZ9
Tuesday 21 January 2020
A Dishonest Toff Scientific Establishment Model in Crisis
A scientific establishment model in crisis: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/vYBss8stqE
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 21, 2020
Let's Bin the Dog's Breakfast History of Discovery Science sold by Darwinians
To date, most historians of science and scientists have credulously swallowed the toff, King Charles Darwin's, serial lies about the discovery of evolution by natural selection and instilled that palpable nonsense into to minds of the general population. But in 2020 we can see a paradigm change taking place. Proper scientists and other veracious scholars are now citing the independently verifiable facts of how Darwin's and Wallace's influencers, friends, Wallace's Sarawak paper editor, and their influencer's influencers red and cited Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published theory years before Darwin and Wallace even put pen to paper on the topic in a private notebook.
This is what a paradigm change looks like.
Professor Dr Mark Griffiths |
Page 20 of Fraud and Misconduct in Research:
‘Plagiarism may present a particularly difficult challenge because sometimes establishing
See other scholarly affirmations of the facts over credulous propaganda beliefs HERE
In 2020, proper academics are now throwing out the dog's breakfast of credulous serial liar and plagiarist #CharlesDarwin toff worship!— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 21, 2020
See what a paradigm change in science and the history of science looks like: https://t.co/O9fyK7t5Vr pic.twitter.com/4jtKo1hpZL