Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group

Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group awarded £10,000 for Patrick Matthew Trail. Darwin no longer rests in any peace! https://t.co/E48X4I8XT5 pic.twitter.com/B06y3RuNJD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 3, 2017

The First Pave the Way for The Rest

Those brave enought to be first into the breach take the greatest vile flak so the rest of us can follow and succeed https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/Z2wLvKoeoJ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) March 23, 2017

Defending Stupidity Reveals a Lot About You

It's hilariously revealing when people defend stupidity in a flawed doctrine because they think they are on its side https://t.co/3pyM1MeaA4 pic.twitter.com/xWp2ydXYuA

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 17, 2017

Royal Society Silent on Dawingate

Subject: Dear Royal Society, @royalsociety Have you Changed the Priority Rule in Scientific Discovery?https://t.co/gT8vkCMk57 pic.twitter.com/DOEHirQaEC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 17, 2017

What Do You Call a Collective of Darwinist Duffasis ?

.@TakeThatDarwin As a big a collective doofas as Darwinians who suffer from Loudon Naturalist Blindness Syndrome? https://t.co/cNRG9sFsae pic.twitter.com/H9ytHuBpwN

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) March 11, 2017

Nominations for my prize for questioning authority?

I see MIT are offering a prize for those who break the rules: "You don't get a Nobel Prize for doing what you're told, you get it for questioning authority,"

 What about the rules of  Darwin worship in science. I broke those with cold hard newly discovered facts that bust the paradigm of  Darwin and Wallace as independent discoverers of an unread prior-published theory see:  Sutton 2014 and Sutton 2016.

Were you to nominate my paradigm changing orignal research discoveries for any prize in science what outcome should we expect? Why?

Evolution trial: Darwin vs Sutton. Please make your bets... https://t.co/Yqsn8nm9gH

— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) March 7, 2017

 ++

"You don't get a Nobel Prize for doing what you're told, you get it for questioning authority" So where's my prize?https://t.co/S5cZO7122o pic.twitter.com/PoRbikOQar

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 9, 2017

Supernatural Darwinism

+

.@JohnParker1988 They could be on the rise. Only now visualized in the mind of credulous and biased pseudo-skeptics? https://t.co/98unybjgbO pic.twitter.com/VTWprCl8nW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 5, 2017

+

But @DrAliceRoberts @rwjdingwall nothing there on evolution of veracity in field of scientific discovery. Why not? https://t.co/aG0MzWn9nV pic.twitter.com/tn3jyNl5l9

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 5, 2017

Rarest Discovery

On the rarest discoveries made in the field of scientific discovery: https://t.co/arzIrYxgzQ pic.twitter.com/YMh3YMZGwk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 4, 2017

The Truth Will Always Out in the End

The Pure Fact-Led Truth:It will always out in the end. Nullius is currently ranked 20 on https://t.co/iGl1uro5GB https://t.co/jkKbs5dEZ7 pic.twitter.com/HRR2gD22Vl

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 4, 2017

Very Important Plagiarists

Perhaps VIP in this Oxford University Press series stands for "Very Important Plagiarists" in the Darwin case? https://t.co/QEWe7wEkpF pic.twitter.com/tI5c8G5bO9

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 27, 2017

Matthew Mocked "God"

Home https://t.co/EEQRXGvTPw pic.twitter.com/5r298vGWAQ

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 23, 2017

No Darwin Medal for anyone proving Darwin a liar and fraudster

And where's my Darwin Medal @SteveHall5582 for my research that proves Darwin lied about the origination of the theory of natural selection? pic.twitter.com/BXO6QsiMCm

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 22, 2017

What's wrong with natural science?

.@TheSocReview Not whilst esteemed institutions of natural science promote & reward plagiarists & abuse originators https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/FyPbzHl2vC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 21, 2017

On Corruption in the Darwin Industry and Royal Society

With regard to Darwin and Wallace's replication of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of natural selection.

Ignoring completely the accepted Arago Ruling on first and foremost priority for a discovery going to whoever had their original discovery published first, the Royal Society awarded the Darwin medal, and its most prestigious Copley medal, to Wallace. Why?  For replicating Matthew's (1831) prior-published theory in 1858 and for claiming it as his own. If that was not a corrupt act by the Royal Society then what is?

No one is ever going to win the Royal Society's Copley Medal now - never mind one of its Darwin Medals - for originally proving Matthew's book, containing the full theory of natural selection, was read and cited by Darwin's and Wallace's friends, influencers and editors and their influencer's influencers before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original conception and claimed to have done so independently of it. Just Google "On Knowledge Contamination" (put it in those speech quotes - its a simple Big Data trick) to find the peer reviewed truth of what has been discovered on this topic.

How can we ask the scientific community to stand up to Trump's anti-vaccination and anti-global warming claptrap when its most esteemed institution is corrupt?

In 1860, 157 years ago, Matthew wrote two letters - both published in the Gardener's Chronicle of that year -  claiming his priority.

Darwin wrote to admit Matthew got the entire thing first - 27 years in published print (in 1831) before he and Wallace replicated the theory in their papers presented before the Linnean Society n 1858.  Yet Darwin continued to call it "my theory" and lied by claiming no naturalist/no one at all had read Matthew's original ideas. Darwin wrote those falsehoods even though Matthew had prior- informed him of two naturists who did read his ideas pre-1858.

We know knewly know (Google 'Nullius in verba Darwin's greatest secret' to get the facts) that many of Darwin's and Wallace's  friends, associates and influencers cited Matthew's book and mentioned his orignal ideas pre-1858 in published print. Selby - the editor of Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper cited Matthew's 1831 book in 1842. Chambers' - Wallace's greatest influencer and Darwin's associate and Correspondent pre-1858 (he authored the Vestiges of Creation in 1844) cited Matthew's book in 1832. there are many more I could mention.

Nevertheless - even despite what has been newly discovered about Matthew's prior-influence-  the Arago Ruling was ignored by The Royal Society.

Before we can take on the likes of  Donald Trump's tweets that vaccinations cause autism and global warming is a Chinese conspiracy (here), our esteemed institutions of science must first put themselves in order. We need an inquiry into the corruption that is the so-called Darwin Industry.

Darwin the Cowardly Plagiarist

https://t.co/dnLJaZ3vZF pic.twitter.com/bzGgmpGG1k

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017

On Corruption in the Darwin Industry

Oxford University Press: "We have a problem"
The Royal Society" "What now?"
Oxford Uni Press: "It's with the truth"https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/gHY7Y2eLcS

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 22, 2017

++

Confirmatory evidence, established by way of a most equistie telling question, that the Darwin Industry is corrupt: https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/xLrSp9rP0z

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017

++

@Criminotweet Looks like the v small book was a publisher's compression of other stuff. Not so much corrupt as lazy and dumb, I suspect

— Brian Deer (@deerbrian) February 19, 2017

++

.@deerbrian Maybe not when you see it in context of Moore's de facto fact-denial behaviour in the national press: https://t.co/70ZRzXgAuL pic.twitter.com/lgOB3x2LMg

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017

++

It's time we learned to distinguish establishment cover-ups from unevidenced conspiracy theories. Both do exist! https://t.co/FZs1Iqew3j pic.twitter.com/zG7hn9GxDL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017

On Knowledge Contamination

Proof of the knowledge contamination concept as views of my article on that topic march towards 10,000: https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nyGiEg1Ykl

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 18, 2017

The 4-U's of Research

@BiologiaPensamt 1. Determine if it really exists (Published Darwinite fact denial behaviour is proven to exist): https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/JQTK5P4VLD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 17, 2017

It has all Gone Trump Shaped for the Royal Society

Going Trump Shaped for the Royal Society @royalsociety

1. https://t.co/SBJwPkZ477

2, https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m

3, https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/ijcBKNBkPP

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 17, 2017

Darwin Day

Read my Best Thinking Blog Post for Darwin Day 2017: HERE

Happy Darwin Day SUCKERS!

1: https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

2: https://t.co/DotiWqaMkbhttps://t.co/xBGGof5eY7#Darwin #PatrickMatthew pic.twitter.com/lj7s35Dwc4

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 12, 2017

++

And to raise questions about research integrity. https://t.co/yksOVd2tEX

— Robert Dingwall (@rwjdingwall) February 12, 2017

++

"No one will EVER win the Nobel Prize
For proving
Darwin lied and Plagiarized."https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
It's too embarrassing for science pic.twitter.com/7ULsyNTDHe

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 12, 2017