Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Tuesday, 8 February 2022
Sunday, 6 February 2022
Bombshell new Research Data on Darwin's Plagiarism goes Viral in 2022
.
.
. .Both. Here is the English version. https://t.co/nBvSGRuJ0s pic.twitter.com/hUA6DETTdy
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 7, 2022
In the week leading up to Darwin Day 2022 Empirical research data proves once and for all that the genie is out of the bottle on Darwin's plagiarism, lies and glory thieving science fraud.
1. The English Mail on Sunday: Here . Archived Here
2. The Scottish Mail on Sunday
.
Just a few bombshell findings from the brand new #Curtis science book (Curtis Press) that blow to pieces the greatest myth and science fraud in the history of our planet! Credulous #DarwinDay organisers need their own #OperationLyingDog now @RichardDawkins @rdfrs @C_MAlexander pic.twitter.com/fl3dJt1VLD
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 6, 2022
3. Sputnick News. Archived HERE
4. Scottish Daily Express
.Headline news too right to story inside on #Science Fraud in the #Darwin Industry https://t.co/ku34b2bJz7 pic.twitter.com/ZA6AL5uKG7
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 7, 2022
The Times Archived here: https://archive.is/gyZrz
More here:
Saturday, 5 February 2022
Myths v Facts in Science and Science Fraud
Is it a myth, a fact or something in-between?
1. Is it true that Darwin and/or Wallace originated the full theory of macroevolution by natural selection?
Answer = No! It's a myth because Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace, and many other top experts on evolution (such as Matthew himself, de Beer, Mayr and Dawkins) all agreed Matthew (1831) was first into print, decades before Darwin or Wallace with the full theory in his book On Naval Timber and Arboriculture.
2. Is it true that Matthew must have failed to influence Darwin and/or Wallace with his theory because no naturalists / no single person had read Matthew's theory before he claimed his priority in a published letter of 1860?
Answer = No! It's a myth started as an empirical proven lie by Darwin in all editions of the Origin of Species from third edition onwards and parroted by the credulous and adoring scientific community ever since. In 1860 Matthew's published letter informed Darwin directly that his book had been reviewed by the famous naturalist and biologist Loudon, reviewed in various periodicals and newspapers and was read by an esteemed profesor who could not teach it nor write about it for fear of pillory punishment, it being heretical in the first half of the 19th century. Sutton's research originally and uniquely identifies 30+ people who read and then cited Matthew's 1831 book in published print before Darwin and Wallace replicated the original theory in it. This list includes Wallace's admitted greatest influencer, Robert Chambers (who met and corresponded with Darwin pre-1858) and the editor of Wallace's famous Sarawak paper - Selby. Loudon edited and published two of Blyth's most influential papers, read by Darwin, and Darwin admitted Blyth was his most prolific correspondent on the topic of species and varieties.
3. Is it true, what Darwin claimed in the Origin of Species and elsewhere, that Matthew was an obscure writer and that Matthew's theory was only briefly given in the scattered pages of an appendix to an entirely irrelevant book on the topic?
Answer = No! It's a myth. Again this myth was started as a published lie by Darwin. Firstly, if Matthew was an obscure writer then how is it that pre-1858 Matthew was cited in the Encyclopedia Britannica and and elsewhere in that publication his 1831 enjoyed a prominent 1/2 page block advert and why is it that it is newly proven that before 1858 Darwin held in his own hands at least five publications that cited Matthew's 1831 book. Darwin lied about Matthew's theory being limited to an appendix because his own letter to Lyell on that topic said it would be splitting hairs to admit the truth (he knew, because Matthew had shown him in his published letter of reply to Darwin) was otherwise. Moreover, trees and plants are at the core of the theory of evolution by natural selection. Darwin was obsessed by trees and he notebook of books he read proves it.
4. Is it true that Darwin originated the term "process of natural selection"
Answer = Something in between. Big Data research does reveal he was apparently first into print with that term. But it is a four word shuffle of Matthew's 1831 original term of the very exact same meaning "natural process of selection". And Chambers (who cited Matthew's 1831 book before writing his own influential 1844 book on organic evolution) was apparently first to be second into print in 1859 with Matthew's original four word term.
5. Is it true that Darwin was the first to use artificial selection as an analogue of natural selection as an analogical explanation explain the process of natural selection?
Answer = No! It's a myth. Matthew was first to do that. He was then followed by Wallace who used it in his Sarawak paper. Darwin replicated Matthew's explanatory analogy in his private essay of 1844 and to open Chapter One in the Origin of Species. In that private essay Darwin even replicated Matthew's highly idiosyncratic analogy of difference between trees raised in nurseries versus trees growing wild in nature.
6. Is it true that Darwin was a remarkably honest man and genius orignal thinker?
Answer = No! It's a myth, proven by each and every one of the empirical fact led five answers to the questions above. Darwin (and Wallace too) was a replicator of a prior published theory and all paths of those who read and cited Matthew's book lead to Darwin and to Wallace and to their known and admitted influencers, friends and to their influencer's influencers. Darwin, with assistance from Wallace, and others,, facilitated and enabled by the bone-headed bias and credulity of the scientific community, committed the worlds greatest science fraud by plagiary and lies.
Get the facts: from Curtis Press Here. Use the code fraud2022 for a discount or else buy from Amazon here
.
.#FactvMyths (1) Darwin originated theory of natural selection = myth (2) No one read Matthew's prior published origination = myth (30+ cited it pre Darwin's replication) (3) Matthew never influenced Darwin = myth (Darwin's & Wallace's main influencers cited Matthew). pic.twitter.com/plyskg0CI8
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 4, 2022
Thursday, 3 February 2022
Every lying cheating two-faced plagiarising dog has its day
With no original ideas of his own, Darwin stole Patrick Matthew's theory and pretended it was his own. When Matthew caught him, Darwin told serial lies about the true originator and who had read his book who Darwin actually knew. The details of the World's greatest science fraud are all in the book Darwin now holds ultimate responsibility for bringing into print in the 21st century. Darwin clearly never "anticipated" BigData.
Available from Curtis Press: Here
Available on Amazon: Here
Wednesday, 2 February 2022
Brian J. Ford on Plagiarism
When I contacted Professor Brian Ford to let him know that my "Selby cited Matthew discovery" research had twice been plagiarised in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society it was me to who Brian responded with what he says in the above January 2022 video:
"If you’re in the public eye and you make an impression, people are going to steal your work. It's actually the ultimate compliment. If in science you haven't been plagiarised, it's because you haven't done anything decent. The minute you do, some miserable two-faced, dishonest bastard is going to come along and steal your work and claim it's his own."
Brian J. Ford 2022
Sunday, 23 January 2022
SCIENCE FRAUD
NOW AVAILABLE AT AMAZON EUROPE (Here). Official release date Darwin Day 2022.
This book is jam packed with independently verifiable empirical data (most of it newly unearthed in the historic publication record by an original Big Data mining method known as IDD) evidence that both Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Patrick Matthew's prior published theory.
FACTS
Don't be afraid of the facts. Even though many university professors are very afraid of them.
I tried to avoid speculation of any kind in the book "Science Fraud" and I have emphasized that fact in interviews with several journalists in the UK who are going to publish the story on Darwin Day (Feb 12th 2022). But getting the facts accepted by the scientific community will depend upon three things, (1) honest intellectual curiosity on the part of Darwin scholars and others (2) objectivity in accepting that verifiable facts are facts (3) being prepared to scientifically debate what all those facts mean, rationally, given the preponderance of the "new data" evidence of knowledge contamination of Darwin's and Wallace's pre-1858 brains.
Friday, 31 December 2021
Science Fraud - Publication on International Darwin Day 2022
Copies of my new book "Science Fraud" can now be ordered in advance of its publication on Darwin Day - February 12 2022.
Visit the science book publisher Curtis Press to order your first impression first edition now: HERE
This book reveals the cast iron bombshell New Data that BIGDATA technology unearthed on Darwin's and Wallace's science fraud by plagiary it also exposes how members of the scientific community and other New Data hater Darwin super-fanatics ceaselessly tried (and failed) to have me fired from a senior academic position at Nottingham Trent University for daring to unearth the unwelcome empirical data that exposes the greatest science fraud by plagiary in history.
The verifiable facts in book shock the scientific establishment to the core.
.Pre-order now ...https://t.co/GekhxOR4VV pic.twitter.com/DfZ0yY9DWT
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher with Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) December 12, 2021
SCIENCE FRAUD: DARWINS PLAGIARISM OF PATTICK MATTHEW'S THEORY ...
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher with Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) December 18, 2021
A telling snippet from Emma Darwin to Patrick Matthew about Matthew's theory of the natural process of selection ...
"... He is more faithful to your own original child than you are yourself ..." pic.twitter.com/WCBRSrYlyD
Mike Sutton is Linkedin here
Saturday, 18 December 2021
The Dagg and Derry Show Part II
The Dagg and Derry Show Part II - Where they continue to write ludicrous made up inside their own heads tales about the history of science, leave a web of tangled junk for consumption by the credulous Darwinite horde and it seems to me that in the process they fail to cite their greatest influencer, on the topic of their silly article before it sinks into their own stupidity (click here on Hugh Dower's page and scroll down to the P.S. heading ).
What a pair of desperate nomarks.
Thursday, 2 December 2021
Darwin's Song: Darwin the Kidnapper
The Devil has a name and its little name is "Net Present Value".
To be sung to the tune of "Happy Now".
Darwin the Kidnapper
Stayed at home plagiarising ‘till eighteen fifty-nine.
Found a sweet theory, buried out of time.
You know I'm happy now, happy as I can be.
Boy, I b'lieve to my soul, its done put that thing on me.
Net present value (One singer sotto voce)
(Narrator) And Nature the old Nurse, took
The professor upon her knee,
Saying, 'Here is a story, un-cooked
By Darwin for thee.
Gimme your good ideas, to steal for this song.
I'm goin' to have my fun until I'm dead an' gone.
'Cause I'm happy now, an' I can't go wrong.
'Cause I got plenty money, I'm gon' carry this good work on.
Net present value (Two singers sotto voce)
(Narrator) Come wander with me, Nature said
Into books buried, yet undead,
And read what is still unread
In the manuscripts you dread.'
I used to be like a dog, I was tied to a tree.
Now I got plenty ideas and Matthew's theory.
You know I'm happy now, happy as I can be.
If I die tomorrow, the world don't owe a thing to me.
Net present value (Three singers sotto voce)
I used to cry over my stealin', I was dumb as I could be.
Now I've got three books out, brought those new thrills to me.
I'm happy now, I'm happy now.
There's nothin' like a stolen song 'bout a stolen theory.
Net present value (Four singers sotto voce)
I got me two, three books written, sweet as can be.
I put that thing on them, and got a written guarantee.
That I can't go wrong, I mean I can't go wrong.
Nothin' like plenty money, good theories, lies, and song.
The Devil has a name. And its little name is: Net present value (Five singers sotto voce)
(Narrator) And he wandered deeper and deeper
With Nature, the dear old Nurse,
Who sang to him night and day
The truth of the universe.
I got plenty fame by plag-risin, ev'ry day of the week.
All I do is walk around, eat, steal an' sleep.
You know I'm happy now, you know I can't go wrong.
'Cause I took plenty fools, Matthew’s theory and this song.
Friday, 12 November 2021
Nature: The dear old Nurse . A poem for all Darwin fact-hater super fans
Get the facts and bury the claptrap at PatrickMatthew.com
The Publication Record
And Nature the old Nurse, took
The professor upon her knee,
Saying, 'Here is a story, un-cooked
By Darwin for thee.
Come wander with me', she said
'Into books buried, yet undead,
And read what is still unread
In the manuscripts you dread.'
And he wandered deeper and deeper
With Nature, the dear old Nurse,
Who sang to him night and day
The truth of the universe.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)