Charles Darwin. Why is he the most influential person in the entire history of the world? Ask the 96 thousandth 853rd most influential.

 

Darwin is ranked the most influential influencer of all time. But why?

The most influential person in the entire history of the World - Charles Darwin is only ranked 1st because he is actually the world's greatest plagiarist. At least that is true according to the 96,853 most influential person of all time: pic.twitter.com/mVG95pfret

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 9, 2020

.

Looking for Xmas gift for someone who hates cheats & liars? This true detective story could be perfect

"This behind-the-scenes portrayal will be fascinating to anyone who loves a true-life detective story, where in this case, the victim was the truth." https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 11, 2020

 

.

#ProtectScotland from lying and corrupt English toffshttps://t.co/RKbJV7ogAU pic.twitter.com/1ZiwOKMiE1

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 21, 2020

Misrepresentation of fact

 Great is the power of the pathological serial liar

On the power of Fake News, Serial Lying, and other Misrepresentations of Fact by nasty Charlatans, Glory Thieves, and Egomaniacal Con Artists. pic.twitter.com/sTt9lb8K2v

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 5, 2020

Quotes and Sayings on Charles Darwin's Plagiarism

 The cat is out of the bag on Darwin's proven plagiarism of the entire theory of evolution by natural selection  and there is no getting it back in

.

The stuff you find in the #globalvillage - This from "Quotes and sayings" website accompanied by some rather "saucy" #clickbait pictures (don't click those pictures) quoting from my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQThttps://t.co/TLsLqwKeqK pic.twitter.com/pRtLo6ffe0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 3, 2020

TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? Thierry Hoquet or True Concept but four-word shuffled plagiarised term?

To me, it looks on the face of it that a pertinent chapter (at least on the obvious issue of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism) is to be found in TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? by Thierry Hoquet pp. 67-96 2013). What is interesting is that in this publication Hoquet cites Matthew's original, and prior to Darwin's and Wallace's supposedly miraculous independent 1858 replication of Matthew's theory, coinage of the term "natural process of selection". Hoquet notes Darwin (1859) wrote 'process of natural selection' in his book The Origin of Species, but that  four-word shuffling of Matthew's term does not appear to interest him. 

Those questioning whether or not Darwin plagiarized Matthew, are of course alerted to the fact ignored by Hoquet that Darwin has originally four-word shuffled Matthew's original phrase into his own regeneration of it.

 In my book (Sutton 2017), I point out why a plagiarist of  Matthew's theory of evolution by natural selection would risk such a thing. My own guessed reason for that is because Darwin had no choice, because the theory is about (1) "selection" that is (2)"natural" (as opposed to artificial) and is a (3) "process".  Therefore, Darwin would have felt he had no choice but to regenerate by four-word shuffling Matthew's original term for the concept he plagiarized from him, otherwise Matthew's theory could not be explained as well as the originator explained it before Darwin stole it. 

NOTE: I am most grateful to Hugh Dower for for sharing the pdf containing Hoquet's publication.

TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? by Thierry Hoquet @HughDower @BiologiaPensamt

.....or "True Concept but four-word shuffled plagiarised term?"https://t.co/h6406hZeQF pic.twitter.com/KIrbTdDCXh

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 2, 2020

Darwin the thief's notebooks stolen, how ironic is that: Theft of a Theft

 We now know that it is beyond all reasonable doubt that Darwin (and Wallace) stole the entire theory of evolution by natural selection from its prior-published originator Patrick Matthew. You can't argue with that data -and that is plainly presented here in an exert  peer reviewed science article. A timeline of Darwin's and Wallace great theft by fraud is here and the whole story can be read in my book (here).

Today we learn that Darwin's notebooks, including the one with his twig of life (it's not a tree), have been stolen from Cambridge University (here).

So the headline should really be "Theft of a Theft".

The concept of a tree of life heuristic device, used to explain evolution was certainly not Darwin's origination either. Karl Ernst von Baer 1826 had drawn one and published one years before Darwin replicated the idea. See Brauckmann (2012)  Image below thanks to Brauckman here

.

Theft of a Theft. @LaxmiAggarwal1

How ironic is the theft of "Darwin the Thief's" plagiarising notebooks from Cambridge University?

1 BBC News https://t.co/wzpLztjVEF

2 Darwin's glory thieving plagiarism. Get the facts of his thieving science swindle https://t.co/oWgFTOn1XC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 24, 2020

The Danger of Appeals to Authority

 Too many so called experts are trained but not educated. Proper education teaches how to think and find things out for yourself.  

The lethal nonsense spread by #BonkersBoris and his so-called expert scientist Dr Jenny Death blindly spewing forth only what others above her said first

2. https://t.co/toOhkBJubW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 23, 2020

Total Nonscience from the Natural History Museum

 Today's big news story is very old news

.

Fact is Patrick Matthew got it right about such major extinction events and Darwin got that totally wrong - which is about the only bit he never plagiarised from Matthew. Because Darwin wanted to please Charles Lyell who promoted: uniformitarianism theory https://t.co/4W0qlBAxt2

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 18, 2020

On Darwin Fanatics and Fake Science History

 "The scientific community and writers on science are fixated on understanding evolution and natural selection only as Darwin expounded it. They are sure they can dismiss anyone who came before; such predecessors could only have had an inferior idea of evolution. The true history of this science is worthless to our keepers of knowledge unless it elevates Darwin to premier status." 

                        (from "A Short but Full Book on Darwin’S Racism" by Leon Zitzer)

"What harm is a bit of heroic folderol about an illusory past, especially if it makes us feel good about the progress of science? I would argue that we misrepresent history at our peril as practicing scientific researchers. If we . . . enshrine one narrow version as true a priori . . . we lose the possibility of weighing reasonable alternatives. If we buy the simplistic idea . . . then we will never understand how fact and theory interact with social context, and we will never grasp the biases in our own thinking."

From Stephen J Gould (1991)Time's arrow, time's cycle : myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time  pp.114-115

.

.

Top scientist, Brian J Ford @brianjford @CurtisPress_ @DrMarkGriffiths @rwjdingwall @faceblindandy @a8drewson @Hollyonline @philwane on plagiarism in science! Holds up my book Nullius in Verba. That's made my day in an excellent week!

Watch the video https://t.co/u5UcR7Ndb1 pic.twitter.com/0o7tGtAL0L

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 15, 2020

.

On Darwin Fanatical Fake Science History https://t.co/dL7VnUkGWk
The Linnean Society, which is publishing & is therefore encouraging plagiarism of my bombshell research breakthrough on Darwin's plagiarism boasts its own beloved portrait of Darwin = silly plagiarist worshippers pic.twitter.com/D5NcEA0nmV

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) October 28, 2020

.

The Linnean @LinneanSociety @BiolJLinnSoc Society is really stinking up science, with its anti-scientific behaviour, isn't it?

Yes. It really is. Get the stinking, shameful, facts here:

https://t.co/YZsRwK37uR

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) October 28, 2020

.

Are you one of those who still thinks Charles Darwin is a paragon of honesty, integrity and genius integrity? If so you have been fooled by the Victorian establishment's propaganda science myth. He was a serial lying vain plagiarist and science fraudster: https://t.co/ojYWDoDKm5 pic.twitter.com/Lht6Bd7GIh

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) August 31, 2020

State of Denial of Darwin Scholalrs

 This Daily Journalist Article is a must red for proper academic interested in the facts of Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory. Archived Here

.

Yet academics would counter that such veiws were not extreme compared to some of the writers of his day. Zitzer tackles this beautifully pic.twitter.com/isZs2zEnjY

— Melvin Carvalho (@melvincarvalho) October 26, 2020

.

On poetic writing by Darwin.

Have you seen his "Tangled Bank Job?" @AlberroHeather https://t.co/ofXLpbEV7c

Hardy an atheist was he "creator???" Then see who he stole it from - a real God (creator) mocking atheist pic.twitter.com/I9FSpGc9XN

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 26, 2020

The Darwin Meme

 The Darwin Plagiarism Meme 

If only Charles Darwin had access to photocopier technology for just an hour, what would he have copied? 

I think he would have copied Patrick Matthew's bombshell book "On Naval Timber" https://t.co/R3oTyZalfe pic.twitter.com/tswdG4BRGc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) October 25, 2020