Boom💣 Boom💣 Boom💣Boom💣
Bombshell Timeline
See the timeline of reactions, including the plagiarism of Darwin and Wallace, pre-1858 citations by agriculturalists and scientists known to Darwin and Wallace, and Darwin's sly lies: HERE
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Tuesday, 4 February 2020
Monday, 3 February 2020
There is a paradigm change taking place in the history of scientific discovery
Following the publication of my book 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret' the history of scientific discovery now has a number of original bombshell new discoveries that rewrite the history of discovery of natural selection:
1. Darwinites can no longer claim - as they did before my book was published - that Patrick Matthew's prior published conception of macroevolution by natural selection was unread by any naturalists before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. Because I originally discovered seven who cited the book that contains it in the pre-1859 literature. And Darwin and Wallace, and their influencers, knew four of them well. Hence it is most significantly newly discovered and 100 per cent proven that routes of potential knowledge contamination from Matthew's (1831) book into the pre-1858 minds of Darwin and Wallace most certainly do exist. The date evidence of this newly discovered publication record now debunks the old Darwinite claim that Darwin's notebooks and private essays prove he independently discovered natural selection.
2. Darwinites can no longer claim that Darwin was an honest scientist. Because it is proven that from 1860 onward, following information provided by Matthew himself. that he lied about the prior readership of Matthew's book and the original ideas in it by other naturalists. Darwin told at least seven other lies in order to convince the scientific community that he independently conceived the idea of natural selection.
3. It can no longer be claimed that Wallace was an honest scientist. Because I originally discovered that he edited one of his letters in his autobiography to conceal his claim that he thought he was owed money and favours by Darwin and his associates for cooperating with the presentation of his replication of the concept of natural selection alongside that of Darwin in 1858.
4. Darwinites can no longer claim that Matthew's conception of natural selection was contained solely in the appendix of his book. I reveal exactly how much is actually contained in the main body of his book and that Darwin lied when he wrote that Matthew's ideas were solely contained in the appendix. Because Matthew referred him to just some of the relevant text from the main body of his book and Darwin wrote to admit the fact to Joseph Hooker.
5. Darwinites should no longer claim that Matthew never understood what he conceived on the grounds that he never shouted about it from the rooftops. Because I show how the first half of the 19th century was governed by laws and conventions that forbade anyone from doing such a thing, and others from discussing it. Moreover, Matthew told Darwin as much when he explained his book was banned from Perth public library in Scotland and that an eminent naturalist could not teach Matthew's breakthrough for fear of pillory punishment. .
1. Darwinites can no longer claim - as they did before my book was published - that Patrick Matthew's prior published conception of macroevolution by natural selection was unread by any naturalists before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. Because I originally discovered seven who cited the book that contains it in the pre-1859 literature. And Darwin and Wallace, and their influencers, knew four of them well. Hence it is most significantly newly discovered and 100 per cent proven that routes of potential knowledge contamination from Matthew's (1831) book into the pre-1858 minds of Darwin and Wallace most certainly do exist. The date evidence of this newly discovered publication record now debunks the old Darwinite claim that Darwin's notebooks and private essays prove he independently discovered natural selection.
2. Darwinites can no longer claim that Darwin was an honest scientist. Because it is proven that from 1860 onward, following information provided by Matthew himself. that he lied about the prior readership of Matthew's book and the original ideas in it by other naturalists. Darwin told at least seven other lies in order to convince the scientific community that he independently conceived the idea of natural selection.
3. It can no longer be claimed that Wallace was an honest scientist. Because I originally discovered that he edited one of his letters in his autobiography to conceal his claim that he thought he was owed money and favours by Darwin and his associates for cooperating with the presentation of his replication of the concept of natural selection alongside that of Darwin in 1858.
4. Darwinites can no longer claim that Matthew's conception of natural selection was contained solely in the appendix of his book. I reveal exactly how much is actually contained in the main body of his book and that Darwin lied when he wrote that Matthew's ideas were solely contained in the appendix. Because Matthew referred him to just some of the relevant text from the main body of his book and Darwin wrote to admit the fact to Joseph Hooker.
5. Darwinites should no longer claim that Matthew never understood what he conceived on the grounds that he never shouted about it from the rooftops. Because I show how the first half of the 19th century was governed by laws and conventions that forbade anyone from doing such a thing, and others from discussing it. Moreover, Matthew told Darwin as much when he explained his book was banned from Perth public library in Scotland and that an eminent naturalist could not teach Matthew's breakthrough for fear of pillory punishment. .
Click here to see the timeline of the World's greatest science fraud.Dare you deal with Darwin's & Wallace's plagiarizing science fraud & serial lies? Plus some of the supporting nonsense from top scientists?— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 3, 2020
All facts. Not theory. Not opinion. Pure independently verifiable facts found in the historic publication record: https://t.co/6XbJ7NaMWd pic.twitter.com/fa48jT2xyD
Sunday, 2 February 2020
Darwinite Nun Spotting in Scotland
Be on the lookout for Darwinite nuns in Scotland and elsewhere in the world
.Invited by several schools, with full funding, I visited #Scotland a couple of years ago to warn school children in the Carse of Gowrie not to be brainwashed by #DarwiniteNuns (male and female fact denial cultists).
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 2, 2020
It all went rather splendidly: https://t.co/FiMYe7JZvo pic.twitter.com/FQt9K6jfhq
'Not all Scottish school children are taught by Darwinite nuns (male and female) that they must shackle their reason and pride to Darwin's whipped and beaten dog sledge of thieving science fraud of a Scot's prior published theory. https://t.co/mVx5NCSG1b pic.twitter.com/w14I3CkN88
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 2, 2020
You may have heard of the Christian Carmelite Nuns.
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 2, 2020
But have you heard of the Darwinites?
Do you know what they are doing in schools in Scotland? They are brainwashing kids that a #Scottish theory belongs to the English!https://t.co/3yfpcA9BQ2 pic.twitter.com/NnpkdvRy1b
Darwin Day
The ludicrously credulous annual celebration of the world's greatest lying, cheating, plagiarizing science fraudster in history will soon be upon us once again
10 day countdown to #DarwinDay - celebration of the worlds greatest cheating lying science fraudster.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 2, 2020
https://t.co/j3PBCHLpwv pic.twitter.com/VCptLibgU8
A Prezie on Charles Darwin's Lying Cheating Science Fraud
Get the verifiable and fully referenced facts. Don't be punterized by the Darwin worship cult. Bin the claptrap.
A "prezzie" for all free - rational and curious - thinkers: https://t.co/5q1DAcO669
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 1, 2020
Saturday, 1 February 2020
Contamination: On virus and knowledge spread
Despite what some idiots claim, it is most important that we do understand where ideas originated.
Origins and spread of disease and ideas are essential areas of the work of scientists and historians of science.
Origins and spread of disease and ideas are essential areas of the work of scientists and historians of science.
Scientists need to know where things originate in order to understand them better and to inform knowledge on contamination
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 1, 2020
1. Virus contamination such as #coronavirus: https://t.co/FdQ8kRv1zX
2. Knowledge contamination to aid future bombshell💣 discoveries https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/oSCg5juE96
Friday, 31 January 2020
Charles Darwin, Patrick Matthew and the Wikigate Scandal
Get the independently verifiable and expert peer reviewed facts, not the credulous propaganda fact denial claptrap
2866 hits so far #wikigate - Get the facts they don't want you to see: https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/3oiVLDQB5u
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) May 24, 2016
Darwin's Mentalist Zombie Horde: Lack of free will once in the cult of Darwin worship
So sad that the scientific establishment is so slow to admit when facts prove its most influential "leaders" and icons and highly respected members and all the rag-tags on its fringes are wrong in all those textbooks and articles and on social media etc and are now totally credulous losers. I really can't understand why they don't admit that right away when it's proven 🙈🙉🙊.
.The poor rabid Darwin "lads" lost their free will to stage 4 of the paradigm change cycle (becoming sheep harassment zombies) for the #mentalist #DarwinCult: 🥴🧟🧟♂️https://t.co/6idOHPWGUw pic.twitter.com/yGAgLqoWyo— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 31, 2020
Don't tell the #DarwinCult pic.twitter.com/rF5DYwA5fS— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 14, 2018
See the Darwin lying cards collection Here
Thursday, 30 January 2020
Darwin is Toast
Following the New Data on his plagiarism. Darwin, most fittingly, is now toast.
Pass the marmalade.
In my book Darwin and Wallace are 100% proven liars and science fraudsters by glory thieving plagiarism.
Pass the marmalade.
Darwin is Toast! As if the miracle of Darwin's & Wallace's dual virgin conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory (which we newly know their influencers & Wallace's editor had prior read & cited) is not enough. Darwin has most fittingly become toast on my book cover! pic.twitter.com/41LC11UKOz— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 30, 2020
In my book Darwin and Wallace are 100% proven liars and science fraudsters by glory thieving plagiarism.
Problem of the idiotic new #Brexit50p coin is solved.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 30, 2020
Moreover, the theory of many idiotic scientists - that nothing can be 100% proven - is also bust. Of course it can you idiots! Toss this coin 100 times a session for infinity and it will never land on tails. Never ever. pic.twitter.com/K2mVj9FdMR
A Criminologist in the field of botany and science fraud by glory thieving lies and plagiary
An expert peer reviewed paper at the intersection of botany and science fraud by plagiary and glory thieving lies.
Patrick Matthew was the first to introduce and propagate giant redwoods in the UK. Many of the trees he planted survive in Scotland today. Yet once again scientists known to Darwin and his cronies tried to steal that glory from him They too were finally exposed by the independently verifiable facts of Matthew's originality: HereMy article on how new #BigData research reveals that Scottish economic botanist, agriculturalist, arboriculturalist, forester Patrick Matthew influenced Darwin and Wallace to plagiarize his original conception of macro-evolution by natural selection: pdf: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/RGbmc7gkS9— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 29, 2020
See giant redwoods in California - from where Matthew got his stock - Here
If you would like to see the Matthew redwoods, head for the Patrick Matthew Trail in Scotland - Here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)