Patrick Matthew: Originator, Immortal Great Thinker and Proven Influencer on Natural Selection

Sunday, 3 November 2019

Liars keep the lazy happy

You might wonder why proven blatant serial liars succeed. Here is why.

People are lazy. That's why Boris Johnson is Prime Minister and leading in the election opinion polls. That and the fact Corbyn is a disingenuous #Trotpillock

Just like religiously indoctrinated credulous fools, even atheists want to simply "believe" in comforting claptrap. pic.twitter.com/TlCEphSH1t
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 3, 2019

Knowledge evolves with new evidence and facts but unevidenced mere beliefs prevail in the minds of stubbornly credulous idiots.

Don't be a lazy fool.
Get the facts at https://t.co/RKbJV7ogAU pic.twitter.com/uEUQLIvasU
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 3, 2019

Friday, 1 November 2019

All Housejocks Step-aside

Maybe it's time the fawning #HouseJocks run by the English "Establishment" realize the independently verifiable truth about the true Scot Patrick Matthew and the serial lying glory thieving sly plagiarist Charles Darwin?

All in the @courier_dundee today. https://t.co/gc2JtZC2QX
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 1, 2019

Monday, 28 October 2019

Charles - The Plagiarist and Serial Liar - Darwin

Charles Darwin was both a plagiarist and serial liar

We all know that Boris #SpafferJohnson is a many times proven #SerialLiar. Did you know that Charles #PlagiaristDarwin is also a proven serial liar? Don't just trust me, check out the independently expert peer reviewed verifiable evidence for yourself:

1. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/mfeC11jZ55
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 28, 2019

Sunday, 27 October 2019

On the word alone of no one

Don't trust anything on word alone. Get the independently verifiable data and check for yourself.

Picture of me on the summit of Mt Everest at midnight.
It's another case of simply "trust me" or "nullius in verba". You decide. pic.twitter.com/HnCWRN6vRU
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 27, 2019

Thursday, 24 October 2019

Why on Earth is this plagiarist science fraudster serial blatant liar so celebrated by anyone anywhere at all? The answer is the same for why the serial liar Boris Johnson was made made UK Prime Minister and serial liar Donald Trump President of the USA

Same way Trump got elected. The answer is that people want to be lied to because they are too lazy to care about finding out the truth. It's easier for lazy people to be lied to. They take the path of least resistance.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

Plagiarism of the work of others is not condemned at all by @UniofOxford. No surprise there then. The establishment celebrates glory stealing liars & plagiarists. No wonder then that serial liar Trump is president of the USA and Johnson UK Prime Minister. https://t.co/MqzvLFcpgB
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

To add to that telling list, I don't respect Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's claims to have discovered for themselves a prior published theory that their friends, Wallace's editor and their influencers & influencer's influencers prior read and cited https://t.co/4HW4hvof5S https://t.co/mDB5D3kd03
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

Sunday, 20 October 2019

Facts v Myths

Hello, my name is Mike Sutton. I set up the website PatrickMatthew.com in the interests of the veracious history of scientific discovery and for those working in the field of plagiarizing science fraud research.

Leaving aside all notions of religious belief, the telling question I would like you to consider when assessing the evidence presented here on my blog and on my website is what tends to first happen when the spirit of critical research provides new data that takes the place of much loved but mere authoritative beliefs, which people believe in only because other people they admire believe them? I expect you know the answer to that, and so it is in that spirit of veracity that I ask you to explore the many pages of my website to examine the difference between reasoned and difficult to obtain new independently verifiable hard evidence, and the rational thinking that follows it, versus beliefs in the story of the discovery of evolution by natural selection that have now been debunked by that new data.

Saturday, 12 October 2019

Magical thinking and credulous stupidity

Consider the facts and weigh them against the magical thinking of the Darwin superfan club

According to ludicrous magical thinking of biologists & credulous historians of science, Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace discovered a book, published in 1831, that plagiarized their discoveries, terminology & idiosyncratic explanatory examples, they published in 1855/58/59.🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/NyrMvJasIQ
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 12, 2019

Sunday, 22 September 2019

Darwin, the Scientific "Establishment" and Antisemitism in Science

Was Darwin's and Wallace's transparently obvious sly plagiarism of the prior published theory of evolution by natural selection and Darwin's proven lies about its originator Patrick Matthew a necessary condition for the Holocaust?

Was Charles Darwin's newly unearthed with #BigData plagiarism of the prior published entire theory of macroevoltion by natural selection, which his & Wallace's friends, editor & their influencers read & prior cited, a necessary condition for the #Holocaust?https://t.co/H24sKXShxz pic.twitter.com/BxI6PF2xYP
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019

Proper education is teaching up-to-date independently evidenced & multiple expert peer reviewed #Actuality, not training students to accept & regurgitate old illusions based on newly debunked claims & uncovered science fraud:
1. https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO
2. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL https://t.co/Iq1WA9cz60 pic.twitter.com/f3nLkgI5eF
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019

Friday, 20 September 2019

The Great Dog Bottom Swap Robbery by Plagiarism Explanatory Analogy

The Explanatory Analogy of the Great Dog's Bottom Swap explains why Darwin and Wallace needed to plagiarize Matthew in order to publish the Origin of Species and Wallace's Sarawak and Ternate papers.
.

Am Explanatory #Analogy for #Plagiarism
Darwin(1859) was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew's (1831) book as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem @BiologiaPensamt @HughDower @Grouse_Beater See--->> https://t.co/JVypGV613a
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019

On plagiarism

The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019

Some attribute the orignal poem to the Australian Henry Lawson (c1910).

Here is my Amazon book review of The Great Dog Bottom Swap
.

Dr. Sutton, iyo, would Matthews have written the same sorts of things as CRD in "Origin", supposing CRD had not "beaten him to it"?
— The Beagler (@DarwinsWeasel) September 20, 2019

(1) Looking at your question the right way around according to linear time, without Darwin having an 1840s (private essay) & 1859 virgin conception miracle of Matthew's 1831 prior published theory, his essential four words term for it "process of natural selection" which.... (2) https://t.co/5XJ0EaF0q8
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

(3) Darwin needed to rip off Matthew's original breakthrough concept and his original creative examples used to explain it. Analogously, Darwin was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem pic.twitter.com/ahiysdko0D
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

Like unearthed & expert peer reviewed evidence of glory theft & associated cover-up lies following new #BigData research on Darwin's #ScienceFraud by plagiary of bombshell prior published theory?
1. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
2. https://t.co/yZSRhuMq7p
3. https://t.co/7Vi9iiZdbI pic.twitter.com/u460i4hQNL
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 22, 2019

The Darwin and Wallace Virgins Meme

Gabriel Woods, the artist who pained in oils on canvas The Blessed Virgin Darwin, describes his painting as an allegorical explanatory analogy for Darwin's and Wallace's great plagiarizing science fraud and glory theft of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural selection.

#Meme: Darwin's & Wallace's amazing dual independent virgin conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory - Miraculous because we newly know their naturalist friends & influences & Wallace's Sarawak paper editor prior read & prior cited it. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL https://t.co/QJIXWVCYhv pic.twitter.com/QQbz77pXfv
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019

Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism included replicating many highly unique explanatory examples Matthew provided in his book - such as the difference between trees selected by nature in the wild and those raised by artificial selection, the camouflage, speed quickness and cunning of animals selected by nature, the very essential words "natural process of selection" (slyly shuffled by Darwin to "natural process of selection", Matthew's grassy bank analogy, and many others. In that regard they stole not only his orignal scientific theory but also his orignal creativity in explaining it.

Stealing orignal ideas and creativity to get those ideas across, by not attributing their source, is the worst kind of plagiarism and fraud by glory theft of the work of another.