On the word alone of no one

Don't trust anything on word alone. Get the independently verifiable data and check for yourself.

Picture of me on the summit of Mt Everest at midnight.
It's another case of simply "trust me" or "nullius in verba". You decide. pic.twitter.com/HnCWRN6vRU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 27, 2019

Liars please lazy people

Why on Earth is this plagiarist science fraudster serial blatant liar so celebrated by anyone anywhere at all? The answer is the same for why the serial liar Boris Johnson was made made UK Prime Minister and serial liar Donald Trump President of the USA

Same way Trump got elected. The answer is that people want to be lied to because they are too lazy to care about finding out the truth. It's easier for lazy people to be lied to. They take the path of least resistance.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

.

Plagiarism of the work of others is not condemned at all by @UniofOxford. No surprise there then. The establishment celebrates glory stealing liars & plagiarists. No wonder then that serial liar Trump is president of the USA and Johnson UK Prime Minister. https://t.co/MqzvLFcpgB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

.

To add to that telling list, I don't respect Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's claims to have discovered for themselves a prior published theory that their friends, Wallace's editor and their influencers & influencer's influencers prior read and cited https://t.co/4HW4hvof5S https://t.co/mDB5D3kd03

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019

Facts v Myths

Hello, my name is Mike Sutton. I set up the website PatrickMatthew.com in the interests of the veracious history of scientific discovery and for those working in the field of plagiarizing science fraud research.

Leaving aside all notions of religious belief, the telling question I would like you to consider when assessing the evidence presented here on my blog and on my website is what tends to first happen when the spirit of critical research provides new data that takes the place of much loved but mere authoritative beliefs, which people believe in only because other people they admire believe them? I expect you know the answer to that, and so it is in that spirit of veracity that I ask you to explore the many pages of my website to examine the difference between reasoned and difficult to obtain new independently verifiable hard evidence, and the rational thinking that follows it, versus beliefs in the story of the discovery of evolution by natural selection that have now been debunked by that new data. 

Magical thinking and credulous stupidity

Consider the facts and weigh them against the magical thinking of the Darwin superfan club

According to ludicrous magical thinking of biologists & credulous historians of science, Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace discovered a book, published in 1831, that plagiarized their discoveries, terminology & idiosyncratic explanatory examples, they published in 1855/58/59.🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/NyrMvJasIQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 12, 2019

Darwin, the Scientific "Establishment" and Antisemitism in Science

Was Darwin's and Wallace's transparently obvious sly plagiarism of the prior published theory of evolution by natural selection and Darwin's proven lies about its originator Patrick Matthew a necessary condition for the Holocaust?

Was Charles Darwin's newly unearthed with #BigData plagiarism of the prior published entire theory of macroevoltion by natural selection, which his & Wallace's friends, editor & their influencers read & prior cited, a necessary condition for the #Holocaust?https://t.co/H24sKXShxz pic.twitter.com/BxI6PF2xYP

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019

.

Proper education is teaching up-to-date independently evidenced & multiple expert peer reviewed #Actuality, not training students to accept & regurgitate old illusions based on newly debunked claims & uncovered science fraud:
1. https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO
2. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL https://t.co/Iq1WA9cz60 pic.twitter.com/f3nLkgI5eF

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019

The Great Dog Bottom Swap Robbery by Plagiarism Explanatory Analogy

The Explanatory Analogy of the Great Dog's Bottom Swap explains why Darwin and Wallace needed to plagiarize Matthew in order to publish the Origin of Species and Wallace's Sarawak and Ternate papers.
.

Am Explanatory #Analogy for #Plagiarism
Darwin(1859) was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew's (1831) book as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem @BiologiaPensamt @HughDower @Grouse_Beater See--->> https://t.co/JVypGV613a

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019

.

On plagiarism

The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019

Some attribute the orignal poem to the Australian Henry Lawson (c1910).

Here is my Amazon book review of The Great Dog Bottom Swap 
.

Dr. Sutton, iyo, would Matthews have written the same sorts of things as CRD in "Origin", supposing CRD had not "beaten him to it"?

— The Beagler (@DarwinsWeasel) September 20, 2019

.

(1) Looking at your question the right way around according to linear time, without Darwin having an 1840s (private essay) & 1859 virgin conception miracle of Matthew's 1831 prior published theory, his essential four words term for it "process of natural selection" which.... (2) https://t.co/5XJ0EaF0q8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

.

(3) Darwin needed to rip off Matthew's original breakthrough concept and his original creative examples used to explain it. Analogously, Darwin was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem pic.twitter.com/ahiysdko0D

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

.

Like unearthed & expert peer reviewed evidence of glory theft & associated cover-up lies following new #BigData research on Darwin's #ScienceFraud by plagiary of bombshell prior published theory?
1. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
2. https://t.co/yZSRhuMq7p
3. https://t.co/7Vi9iiZdbI pic.twitter.com/u460i4hQNL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 22, 2019

The Darwin and Wallace Virgins Meme

Gabriel Woods, the artist who pained in oils on canvas The Blessed Virgin Darwin, describes his painting as an allegorical explanatory analogy for Darwin's and Wallace's great plagiarizing science fraud and glory theft of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural selection.

#Meme: Darwin's & Wallace's amazing dual independent virgin conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory - Miraculous because we newly know their naturalist friends & influences & Wallace's Sarawak paper editor prior read & prior cited it. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL https://t.co/QJIXWVCYhv pic.twitter.com/QQbz77pXfv

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019

Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism included replicating many highly unique explanatory examples Matthew provided in his book - such as the difference between trees selected by nature in the wild and those raised by artificial selection, the camouflage, speed quickness and cunning of animals selected by nature, the very essential words "natural process of selection" (slyly shuffled by Darwin to "natural process of selection", Matthew's grassy bank analogy, and many others. In that regard they stole not only his orignal scientific theory but also his orignal creativity in explaining it.

Stealing orignal ideas and creativity to get those ideas across, by not attributing their source, is the worst kind of plagiarism and fraud by glory theft of the work of another.

On plagiarism

The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019

On Madison Grant, Giant Redwoods and the Eugenics Movement

A key player in the Eugenics movement, Madison Grant was one of those Americans who saved the giant redwood trees (you can read about that here). But he also set about a racist agenda to take eugenics from concerns with survival of the fittest individual to survival of the fittest "race" (read variety) of human beings. Like Patrick Matthew (read his 1831 book here), whose racism led him to believe White Anglo Saxon people from Germany were at the pinnacle of human evolution, but were being held back and weakened by unnatural artificial selection cultural practices of the upper classes not intermarrying with the best of the lower social classes, Madison Grant thought the Nordic races were the most superior and at risk of being genetically weakened by what he thought were inferior Jewish, Italian and other people from Southern Europe emigrating to the USA. 

Madison Grant never worried too much about Black people because he felt the racist laws of the US, which forbade Black and White intimate relationships illegal, were effective in that regard. You can read more on his promotion of the Eugenics movement and acknowledged huge direct influence on Adolf Hitler here. Interestingly, and arguably to some extent ironically, Matthew promoted the emigration of  White British people to conquer new lands and peoples in order to best promote the chances of White Anglo Saxon "stock" in his 1839 book Emigration Fields, which built upon his earlier ideas on natural selection in plants, animals and humans. 

The Chartist leader, forester, agriculturist and orchardist Patrick Matthew (1831) was the first to publish the full theory of macroevolution by natural selection and was also first to introduce giant redwood trees into the UK. Most importantly, in both cases members of the establishment defrauded Matthew of his priority. Read "Race for Giant Redwood Fame" to read my blog on the facts on how one of Darwin's inner circle members deprived Matthew and his son of the priority they deserved for being first to export and introduce Giant redwoods into the UK.

By defrauding Matthew (an atheist who mocked God, the church and members of the aristocracy) Darwin made his discoveries acceptable to the Christian establishment that ran things in the 19th century Western world, by way of keeping God in his plagiarized version. Arguably, therefore, without Darwin's plagiarism and lies about Matthew the Holocaust would never have taken place. This is because Matthew's breakthroughs and all his essential explanatory examples, terminology and analogies of difference would have been effectively suppressed and so not plagiarized to be popularized by Darwin. You can find my earlier blog on that topic here.

 Google "On Knowledge Contamination" to read my expert peer reviewed article on the newly unearthed facts of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarizing fraud and supporting lies.

Once again historical research reveals incredible connection between the 1831 scientific breakthrough of Patrick Matthew's theory of macroevolution by natural selection, saving California's giant redwoods from extinction, the Eugenics movement & Holocaust: https://t.co/EAAnqT0i07 pic.twitter.com/8wpaUgbmD8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019

From the 1930's to its final end in the 1970's, the American Eugenics movement sterilized over 60,000 people in an attempt to take charge of its own evolution (facts here).

Eugenics was based on Patrick Matthew's (1831) (plagiarized by Charles Darwin) breakthrough on evolution by natural selection. Interested in Eugenics and Nazism? Here is a fascinating drama film on the terrifying 1920's/1930's Eugenics movement in the USA: https://t.co/OEJ3UHLU2p

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 17, 2019

Newly Unearthed Reality versus Old Illusions

We live in a world where fake news now passes scrutiny with impunity. This should come as no surprise when we allow our scientific community to similarly hoodwink us.

Strange times in UK & USA. We now live headed by moronic leaders spouting fake news & lies with apparent impunity.

Even in the world of science our scientists cannot distinguish between newly unearthed actuality and their establishment's old illusions. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/KxE3N9Avz3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019

Darwin began stealing the work of others as early as the age of 17-18

On Darwin and Robert grant at Edinburgh - The great sponging

In fact aged 18 Darwin even aped the highly idiosyncratic specialist interests of his university mentor Robert Grant on sponges and rushed by capering off to be slyly first to present his own version on them at the Plinian Society at Edinburgh University. Grant was livid. https://t.co/69MSLRIgGR pic.twitter.com/DMlWuRuTde

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2019

Reference : https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330891?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

.

I read it some time ago. Yes it does. You can find various other books covering the story in detail. Most simply say that Grant was too harsh and the whole affair made Darwin despise the conventions on priority. However, see https://t.co/UI2I61mHEp

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2019

.

Hugh. On Darwin upsetting Grant and so Grant upsetting Darwin on Darwin's capering @HughDower @BiologiaPensamt This is a most interesting (p. 232 from Darwin's Ghosts by Rebecca Stott) on yet another now missing Darwin paper.From page 232 of Darwin’s Ghosts by Rebecca Stott: pic.twitter.com/sLMadXiOeT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 10, 2019

.

@HughDower @BiologiaPensamt
So Gavin de Beer's text was taken from Darwin's biography (written with help of Darwin's son) . What Darwin writes there does no square with what Henrietta Darwin wrote about her father's & Grant's feeling on the matter at all https://t.co/IfCRI4LU2g

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 10, 2019

References
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ML8b6hhdujsC&pg=PA232&lpg=PA232&dq=henritetta+darwin+lost+note+1947&source=bl&ots=SUMyuflEYC&sig=ACfU3U2wJY69KuAmmppEve9FnhGqpmF2Rw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjI98jPwcbkAhWQYMAKHU7LCxUQ6AEwFHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=henritetta%20darwin%20lost%20note%201947&f=false