Ahhh Coincidence!

Of course coincidences happen. I think the Dutch prime Minister's adoption of my prior Monty Python Black Knight analogy for the UK Prime Minister's Brexit deal is probably a coincidence. See tweet below:

Dutch PM compares May's deal to a limbless fighting knight
1. https://t.co/8wbbsK8BZs …
Is he one of my Dutch fan club? Coincidence or #KnowledgeContamination influence? Because I used same analogy much earlier on Twitter
2. https://t.co/qJV15IPYk6
3. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 18, 2019

 But what if the Dutch PM was to repeat many, many more of the original ideas in my tweets? What if his known influencers and their influencers were to cite my tweets? What if he was to take my original and prior published Market Reduction Approach and call it his own? What if he three-word shuffled my original name for it to 'Reduction, Market Approach"? Any reasonable person would then assume I have in some way (directly or indirectly) knowledge contaminating his brain with my own. Moreso, I'm told I have a Dutch fan club - via this comment reply to the latest review of my book Nullius.

"In my opinion, your review of Sutton's book is balanced and correct.
In our Dutch Sutton-fanclub we sometimes do not call him Mike Sutton but Mike Tyson, because he single handedly out-argued an army of neo-darwinists."

As opposed to a large number of mere multiple coincidences, I think on the weight of evidence that it is quite reasonable to argue that on the balance of reasonable probability that Matthew did indeed knowledge contaminate both Darwin and Wallace with his prior-published original theory of what he uniquely called the "natural process of selection" and Darwin originally called, by four words shuffling, the "process of natural selection". There are so many, many more original Matthewian replications by Darwin and Wallace, and by their proven influencers, who actually cited Matthew's (1831) book, On Naval Timber and Arboriculture years before Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic decades later, evidencing prior-influence on the brains of Darwin and Wallace. One who cited Matthew's book back in the 1830s was living in Holland and cited it in Dutch! It is all this newly unearthed data, found with the Big Data IDD method, that reveals these unwelcome, disruptive, facts. See my peer reviewed article, which reveals all with independently verifiable evidence form the historic publication record: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

.

What do I, the Dutch Prime Minister @markrutte. and Charles Darwin have in common (or not as the case may be)? https://t.co/7fiuVrZF8y pic.twitter.com/TeePfoYrR0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 18, 2019

.

#Fun #Humour #History & #Science. What do I, The Dutch Prime Minister and Charles ("#TheCopycatKing") Darwin all have in common? Or not, as the case may be. You decide on the basis of the independently verifiable facts weighed with reasonable probability: https://t.co/jWX1huuYey pic.twitter.com/bfF65tecdg

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 18, 2019

Propaganda in science

The untold tale of the woman who dug up ancient sea monsters https://t.co/ZItMqxzDmD

— Rachel Harding (@Silverwriter) March 17, 2019

.

Portrayed for her orignal discoveries as an idiot savant - the scientific establishment did the same thing to Patrick Matthew. Why? Because they are slyly - through propaganda - bigging up one of their own, who they want to look cleverer than the actual discoverer/ originator. pic.twitter.com/zoY3GMrubr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 17, 2019

Don't be a Darwin: Don't steal the work and ideas of others, claim it as your own and then lie when challenged on it!

Don't be a copycat! Don't be a Darwin, or else you will look a proper old Charlie.

Student's and other scholars and writers beware. We never had the technology to catch Darwin until the 21st century (see Sutton 2014 and 2018). But if you do what he did you will be caught and humiliated.

Professor: "Why is is wrong to depict Darwin a monkey or ape?
Student: "Because apes & humans both descended from a now extinct common ancestor?"
Professor: "No! It's simply because they should draw him as a cat. He is the world's greatest #copycat. He plagiarised the theory." pic.twitter.com/vYRZFySn2Y

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 16, 2019

Darwin Trolls

From a topographical ocean of Charles Darwin superfan obsession, malicious activities, stalking, plagiarism and other idiocy

Top chronic fatigue researcher QUITS due to 'hostile' trolls https://t.co/Gm2jDamVn5 . This happens after groundbreaking research. I've had Darwin superfans writing poison pen emails, cyberstalking my university employer, students and associates etc See: https://t.co/Ko6Z7GCth2 pic.twitter.com/RXhATqBU1o

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 15, 2019

Hilarious Linnean Society: Where do they get the brassneck?

Hilarious & #ironic @LinneanSociety society hosts event: "Imposter Syndrome: How successful people often feel like frauds." They should really host one on frauds they facilitated to make originators feel like imposters of their own original breakthroughs! https://t.co/vHTppqTJMW pic.twitter.com/d1KCuhWqnk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 14, 2019

The Linnean Society is Disgraceful: Series of Scandals

The Linnean Society has a long history of facilitating the theft of the ideas of underdogs. They are still at it today. A disgraceful bunch: https://t.co/lx7FDPL8ze pic.twitter.com/XhYa3qe2C7

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 13, 2019

Plagiarism, Repeatedly, Facilitated by the Linnean Society

This will go down in history as the thing that quite rightfully exposed what the Linnean Society and its Journal represent

Since The Linnean Society Journal @BiolJLinnSoc allowed a jealous twerp to plagiarise me, I'm going to make sure it gets all the publicity it deserves. The Linnean Society has a long history of facilitating plagiarism #DarwinCat On Darwin's Cat #copycat: https://t.co/tvgtt3FThh pic.twitter.com/vKwbVDglDq

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 12, 2019

Darwin's Cat is Out of the Bag

Cat is out of the bag. No amount of corrupt activities from likes of the @BiolJLinnSoc Linnean Society, which is facilitating plagiarism of my original work in this area by cultish Darwin fans, in order to try to cover it up, can put it back inside. Proof https://t.co/C8o3fPbLP4 pic.twitter.com/NvBgatpvh0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 11, 2019

Darwin was a Copycat

For 160 years pseudo scholars and ignorant creationist have lampooned Charles Darwin as a monkey or ape. They got that wrong. They should have been lampooning him as a copycat.

Darwin is the world's greatest plagiarising science fraudster by glory theft of a prior published theory. A theory that his friends, influencers and influencer's influencers read and are newly discovered to have cited in the literature before he or Wallace wrote a word on the topic anywhere (see Nullius).

For 160 years Darwin has been lampooned by creationists as an ape or monkey. What scholars should have been doing is lampooning him as a cat, a #CopyCat.

Darwin is the World's greatest plagiarist & serial liar about Patrick Matthew, whose theory he stole https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/bCd1JqRmJa

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 10, 2019

.

Home: https://t.co/I8BK3UCf8x pic.twitter.com/DUMTNgY4aV

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 11, 2019

Copycats of the world

Darwin, in plagiarising Matthew's discovery, uniquely slyly four-word shuffling his unique name for it, and so many of his analogies and other supporting evidences from nature (see Nullius in Verba) is arguably our greatest copycat.

.