The Brute Censorship of Hugh Dower

Similar experiences confirmed by scientists: https://t.co/joE46b8rIC and I have more examples of such brute censorship of verifiable facts.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 28, 2017

Pseudo Scholarly Fact-denial Darwin Worship and the Rise of the Right

My Amazon Review of The Rise of The Right via Devastating anti-intellectual impact of neoLiberalism on universities https://t.co/5oExBMX5Ub pic.twitter.com/dtDYSzrfBS

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 28, 2017

Darwin's Grandfather Erasmus:Like Charles was Also a Repeat Plagiarist

Because his grandfather another proven repeat plagiarist was a co-founder of the Royal Society he got away with it: https://t.co/dluk7aSwtz

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 28, 2017

Darwinians are akin to fact denying religious maniacs

When I gave factual lecture on Darwin & Matthew a member of the audience berated "How dare YOU call Darwin a liar! https://t.co/hzhlcZC1nL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 28, 2017

A. N. Wilson On Darwin is a case study in Dysology

Because biologists - indeed all scientists - have allowed a cult of Darwinism to dominate the
academic literature with easily proven myths and lies about Patrick Matthew (started by Darwin) they have created a niche for claptrap to flourish. A. N Wilson's book - at least what he reveals about it here (ahead of its release) and in the Times - proves he doesn't even understand what the theory of the process of natural selection actually is. Hence, he conforms the Dysology Hypothesis:

 "Letting scholars get away with publishing fallacies and myths signals to others the existence of topics where guardians of good scholarship might be less capable than elsewhere. Such dysology then serves as an allurement to poor scholars to disseminate existing myths and fallacies and to create and publish their own in these topic areas, which leads to a downward spiral of diminishing veracity on particular topics."

A. N Wilson on Darwin in the Evening Standard: HERE

It i s true that many like A.N Wilson, ignorantly, confuse the ancient development theory of evolution with the process of natural selection pic.twitter.com/dlCkRP77OE

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 28, 2017

+

Are they Worshipping Darwin as a God Substitute?

pic.twitter.com/CuG6RoebYd

— Atheistpunk-is-real (@atheist_punk1) August 27, 2017

+

Actually many do just that by credulously worshipping Darwin as a genious hero despite his proven lies & plagiarism https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/oGErpsotjd

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 28, 2017

Invitation to major grassroots event

On Darwin & plagiarism of Matthew's conception. @HughDower @AWil2003 Invitation to grassroots event in Scotland: https://t.co/JcxhOJtvjr pic.twitter.com/lHcBwaoLMf

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 27, 2017

The Courier on Matthew and Darwinites

The Scottish Press reports on Patrick Matthew and the shameful behaviour of memebers of so called "Darwin Industry" https://t.co/wSZHYe4j6n pic.twitter.com/UCUfehQj3J

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 22, 2017

In Case of Myths Break Glass

Darwinism has a heart of glass when it comes to their namesake's proven plagiarism

1. https://t.co/nx7NOk13yD

2. https://t.co/lS8DprNLlx pic.twitter.com/JsEzTUCsEc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 21, 2017

Royal Society and Linnean Society Promote Belief in Dual Immaculate Miraculous Conception

#LOL Each miraculously immaculately conceived Matthew's prior published theory, Their influencers prior-cited it! https://t.co/2WQGnEqk3X pic.twitter.com/4UuEsyBMqa

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 20, 2017