Available on Amazon: https://t.co/jj27KPguZU pic.twitter.com/aXtWuTMRKA
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 4, 2016
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Wallace could well have lied: In light of the new evidence
The Blessed Virgin Darwin
.@DrIreneZempi They can have the Virgin Darwin Image then. I think that will be OK because based on scientists with faith in dual miracle. pic.twitter.com/GddeY6GFg0
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 4, 2016
Saturday, 3 December 2016
Darwin Lied
https://t.co/6JQXBT0hko pic.twitter.com/qzxSF0IKTz
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 3, 2016
Friday, 2 December 2016
One small step at a time: Driving the Corrupt Darwin-Lobby into the Gutter of the History of Science Fraudsters along with their Plagiarising Namesake
The Full Story of Corrupt-Darwin-Lobby Agenda Editor Fraud - up until yesterday - is here.
On this topic the Wikipedia page now (currently) reads:
~~~
The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine; it praised Matthew's book in around 13,000 words, highlighting that "The British Navy has such urgent claims on the vigilance of every person as the bulwark of his independence and happiness, that any effort for supporting and improving its strength, lustre, and dignity, must meet with unqualified attention." It approved of Matthew "strictly in his capacity as a forest-ranger, where he is original, bold and evidently experienced in all the arcana of the parentage, birth and education of trees. But, we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature, or on the outrages committed upon reason and justice by our burthens of hereditary nobility, entailed property, and insane enactments." The review did not mention the appendix to the book.[11][12]
~~~
Of course, Matthew's orignal conception was not limited to the book's appendix. That is a lie written by Darwin and parroted by his followers ever since as though it is the gospel truth. We know it is a lie, rather than a mistake, because he admitted to his mentor Charles Lyell that it would be "splitting hairs" to admit the truth on that particular issue. Get the peer reviewed facts - with full references to the independently verifiable historic publication record, which the weird pseudo-scholarly fact denial cult of corrupt Darwinities are trying to keep buried HERE.
On this topic the Wikipedia page now (currently) reads:
~~~
The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine; it praised Matthew's book in around 13,000 words, highlighting that "The British Navy has such urgent claims on the vigilance of every person as the bulwark of his independence and happiness, that any effort for supporting and improving its strength, lustre, and dignity, must meet with unqualified attention." It approved of Matthew "strictly in his capacity as a forest-ranger, where he is original, bold and evidently experienced in all the arcana of the parentage, birth and education of trees. But, we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature, or on the outrages committed upon reason and justice by our burthens of hereditary nobility, entailed property, and insane enactments." The review did not mention the appendix to the book.[11][12]
~~~
Of course, Matthew's orignal conception was not limited to the book's appendix. That is a lie written by Darwin and parroted by his followers ever since as though it is the gospel truth. We know it is a lie, rather than a mistake, because he admitted to his mentor Charles Lyell that it would be "splitting hairs" to admit the truth on that particular issue. Get the peer reviewed facts - with full references to the independently verifiable historic publication record, which the weird pseudo-scholarly fact denial cult of corrupt Darwinities are trying to keep buried HERE.
Tuesday, 29 November 2016
Hypocrisy and delusional Darwinite thinking
@SkepticNikki @michaelshermer Sorry. No difference because Shermer credulously believes in the dual miracle conceptions of Darwin & Wallace pic.twitter.com/GLCCEhfPqc
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 29, 2016
Monday, 28 November 2016
Data is the revolution that replaced lies and silly stories
.@ARWallace Fction can't replace the hard data that renders their dual immaculate conception miracle story redundant https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/OwLBONm297
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 28, 2016
Thursday, 24 November 2016
The truth always gets out there in the end
++Good. There you are on debunking the spinach myth. Now... let's see your work on debunking the Darwin myth.. https://t.co/JY3gwIx2JQ— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) November 24, 2016
NTU's @Criminotweet was on @bbcworldservice discussing extremists in relation to the #JoCox murder trial https://t.co/tfWmwZwEyv (10.25 in)— NTU Press Office (@NTUNews) November 24, 2016
There is an alternative vision for the future. It's one based upon veracity not fact-denial, pseudo scholarship and political claptrap.
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
Desperate Pseudo Scholarship: A case study
Discover the evidence-led mark of desperate pseudoscholarship: https://t.co/5htznSFyZZ pic.twitter.com/Okdzw7YZCg
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 23, 2016
Tuesday, 22 November 2016
Survival of the fittest
Survival of the Fittest.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 22, 2016
Charles Darwin's lies about Matthew finally failed to outrun the truth. Now they must die! https://t.co/G8wgu5m1u8 pic.twitter.com/6G1SGeetdA
Saturday, 19 November 2016
Merry Christmas Darwinites
Great to see @Dysology great research getting recognition. Did Darwin lie and 'steal' theory of natural selection? https://t.co/5rMplv9zQU— Dr James Treadwell (@James_Treadwell) November 2, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)