Dear Royal Society About that Darwin Medal

.@royalsociety Can I win @TeessideSitP your "Darwin Medal" for originally proving it's namesake a liar & plagiarist? https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 19, 2016

Well?

Can Dr Sutton @Criminotweet @Dysology win the "Darwin Medal" for originally proving Darwin to be a liar & plagiarist?

Make your guess...

— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) July 21, 2016

You Can Delete but you Can't Hide: Because delete never means delete on the Internet

Check it out: https://t.co/tALARfQv2k pic.twitter.com/JNJtO8gjyA

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 18, 2016

The Patrick Matthew Burial project is Unearthed

Find out all the newly excavated facts in my peer reviewed science paper: On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis

THE PATRICK MATTHEW BURIAL PROJECT

Unearth the facts that have been deliberately buried these last 155 years : https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/BJXzYXk19Q

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 17, 2016

The Tangled Web of the Darwin Deification Cult is Unravelliing

Rational Wiki for rational people
(1) https://t.co/3Sca9Jy6X4

Wikipedia for irrational & corrupt fact deniers:
(2) https://t.co/Ypag00SgZM

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 17, 2016

Take the poll. Take action.

Anyone care @DrMarkGriffiths about reach of fact denial tentacles of a weird science cult? https://t.co/PO4HLYU74Z

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 17, 2016

A Poem On the Discovery of the Citing Seven

https://t.co/uOpDBsxlM8 pic.twitter.com/qrB3nh5ib9

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016

We All Have the Duty to Tackle Fact Denial Behaviour in Science

In the Democratic World we All have this Responsibility to Tackle Establishment Fact Denial: https://t.co/MXoXcakQ8u pic.twitter.com/d12PRE9tnk

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016

The Psychologist is In: "Next Darwinite please"

Many Darwinites should visit this psychologist for help & advice on rationality & reality https://t.co/TXI1CYH1CS pic.twitter.com/Rg31JGTRvq

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 15, 2016

 Top Psychologist Dr Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University in England has read the recent research publications, which reveal so much uncomfortable new evidence that punctures the old myth that no one known to Darwin or his influencers, or his influencercer's influencers, read Patrick Matthew's prior publication of the full hypothesis of macro evolution by natural selection before 1858.

Griffiths  concludes that the evidence is strongly in favour of Matthew having influenced Darwin and that Darwin lied from 1860 onward about who really did read Matthew's ideas before he and Wallace replicated them and each claimed them as their own independent conceptions without any citation to their original source. Read his findings here.

Sound Tautology: Knowledge contamination is proof of concept

Discovery of New Data Challenges Darwin's Story of Immaculate Conception https://t.co/Si2NOFWmBM #Science via @niume_official

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 14, 2016

Miracle...Innit! 

@TakeThatDarwin Na that don't fit what they wrote... innit. Miracle man: https://t.co/cPweJHYQo7 bruv. pic.twitter.com/NwPxHhI4Ca

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 14, 2016

Darwin's Ghosts are Ghost Busted

Ghost Busted on Amazon https://t.co/awPnhTRUzr pic.twitter.com/UTbL4je0y9

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 14, 2016