Fact Denying Darwinians Face Intellectual Extinction

In the Democratic World we All have this Responsibility to Tackle Establishment Fact Denial: https://t.co/MXoXcakQ8u pic.twitter.com/d12PRE9tnk

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 16, 2016

Find out how Big Data analysis proved biologists think 25 = 0

Find out how I GOT 'EM! in first 3 #FREE chapters. Darwin & Wallace plagiarizing fraudstershttp://t.co/aE7UFhT8oZ … pic.twitter.com/sMrPchnOoc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 27, 2015

Proof of Concept

Proof of concept as 8000+ brains now contaminated with the knowledge of Darwin's plagiarism and science fraud lies: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/D03Knn3feQ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 9, 2016

++

Two peer reviewed articles prove we celebrate a glory thieving liar on the £10 note
1. https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/5xkPjbmQiQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 11, 2016

Can Biologists count to four?

Quantitative research of the simplest kind 100% disproves claims of the scientific establishment. 1+1+1+1 = 4 versus = Zero. pic.twitter.com/bTG9zZ3PXf

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 5, 2016

Are we attracted to belief in improbable independent conceptions and then to worship the claimants?

My Gift to Publier - The town in France forced to take down its Virgin Mary statue, because it is secular and in a public place Here 

Public Domain

Celebration in Public Places of Non-Secular Scientific Beliefs in Improbable Miracles is Probably OK in France

Christians believe that, whilst surrounded by men who were fertile to some degree, St Mary had a virgin conception of Jesus of Nazareth by way of a supernatural deity.

Members of the scientific establishment believe Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace each independently conceived Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of macroevolution by natural slection whilst surrounded and influenced by friends, associates, and - in Wallace's case his editor - whose brains were fertile with Matthew's original breakthrough, because years earlier they cited the book containing it!

Perhaps there is something in the human psyche causing a compulsion to believe in improbable claims to independent conceptions and then worship the claimant?

More context: Here.   

Wallace could well have lied: In light of the new evidence

Available on Amazon: https://t.co/jj27KPguZU pic.twitter.com/aXtWuTMRKA

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) December 4, 2016

The Blessed Virgin Darwin

.@DrIreneZempi They can have the Virgin Darwin Image then. I think that will be OK because based on scientists with faith in dual miracle. pic.twitter.com/GddeY6GFg0

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 4, 2016

Darwin Lied

https://t.co/6JQXBT0hko pic.twitter.com/qzxSF0IKTz

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 3, 2016

One small step at a time: Driving the Corrupt Darwin-Lobby into the Gutter of the History of Science Fraudsters along with their Plagiarising Namesake

The Full Story of Corrupt-Darwin-Lobby Agenda Editor Fraud  - up until yesterday - is here.

On  this topic the Wikipedia page now (currently) reads:

                                                                 ~~~
The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine; it praised Matthew's book in around 13,000 words, highlighting that "The British Navy has such urgent claims on the vigilance of every person as the bulwark of his independence and happiness, that any effort for supporting and improving its strength, lustre, and dignity, must meet with unqualified attention." It approved of Matthew "strictly in his capacity as a forest-ranger, where he is original, bold and evidently experienced in all the arcana of the parentage, birth and education of trees. But, we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature, or on the outrages committed upon reason and justice by our burthens of hereditary nobility, entailed property, and insane enactments." The review did not mention the appendix to the book.^[11][12]
                                                                  ~~~

Of course, Matthew's orignal conception was not limited to the book's appendix. That is a lie written by Darwin and parroted by his followers ever since as though it is the gospel truth. We know it is a lie, rather than a mistake,  because he admitted to his mentor Charles Lyell that it would be "splitting hairs" to admit the truth on that particular issue. Get the peer reviewed facts - with full references to the independently verifiable historic publication record, which the weird pseudo-scholarly fact denial cult of corrupt Darwinities are trying to keep buried HERE.

Hypocrisy and delusional Darwinite thinking

@SkepticNikki @michaelshermer Sorry. No difference because Shermer credulously believes in the dual miracle conceptions of Darwin & Wallace pic.twitter.com/GLCCEhfPqc

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 29, 2016

Data is the revolution that replaced lies and silly stories

.@ARWallace Fction can't replace the hard data that renders their dual immaculate conception miracle story redundant https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI pic.twitter.com/OwLBONm297

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 28, 2016

The truth always gets out there in the end

Good. There you are on debunking the spinach myth. Now... let's see your work on debunking the Darwin myth.. https://t.co/JY3gwIx2JQ

— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) November 24, 2016

++

NTU's @Criminotweet was on @bbcworldservice discussing extremists in relation to the #JoCox murder trial https://t.co/tfWmwZwEyv (10.25 in)

— NTU Press Office (@NTUNews) November 24, 2016

There is an alternative vision for the future. It's one based upon veracity not  fact-denial, pseudo scholarship and political claptrap.

Desperate Pseudo Scholarship: A case study

Discover the evidence-led mark of desperate pseudoscholarship: https://t.co/5htznSFyZZ pic.twitter.com/Okdzw7YZCg

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 23, 2016

Survival of the fittest

Survival of the Fittest.

Charles Darwin's lies about Matthew finally failed to outrun the truth. Now they must die! https://t.co/G8wgu5m1u8 pic.twitter.com/6G1SGeetdA

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 22, 2016

Merry Christmas Darwinites

• The perfect stocking filler for Darwin miracle fans is:available on Amazon Here   
• Browse some of the book's highlights Here    
• Listen to an interview with the author Here    
• Read an expert peer-reviewed scholarly science journal article on some of the findings Here   

Great to see @Dysology great research getting recognition. Did Darwin lie and 'steal' theory of natural selection? https://t.co/5rMplv9zQU

— Dr James Treadwell (@James_Treadwell) November 2, 2016

Those Who Harass and Facilitate the Harassment of Paradigm Changing Discoverers and Immortal Great Thinkers will be Exposed and Shamed for All Eternity

"A leading psychologist whose research on human memory exposed her to death threats, lawsuits, personal abuse and a campaign to have her sacked has won a prestigious prize for her courage in standing up for science." 

                                                         

                                                      Read her story: Here

What we do in this life echoes through eternity

Having been professionally harassed & abused due to my discoveries I see Loftus's story of criminological imprtance: https://t.co/bpgUyVmZXz pic.twitter.com/rZh6hLKx2N

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 18, 2016

++

My own story so far - well just some of it. The rest is far worse and, rest assured, it will be published in the future.

Read just some of the facts of the professional harassment and abuse I have been on the receiving end of  here

Here are the published facts some really don't like: 

1. Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret

2. On Knowledge Contamination 

Darwin might well have gorged on owl during one of his Glutton Club dinners

Charles Darwin ate my owl : https://t.co/VyRrxtG9Lf pic.twitter.com/epDDpCEYdO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 17, 2016

Rattling windows and shaking doors

Re The Royal Society: Public Vote on Darwin's priority being set below Patrick Matthew's:https://t.co/oJ7yZgy2iz pic.twitter.com/BPaw95HIBN

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 17, 2016

Truth, Just like Gravity, is Not a Social Construct

"Post-truth" is the OEDs word of the year, because truth, like gravity, is not a post modernist social construction https://t.co/LgpRGigKnL pic.twitter.com/phyVDym5Ir

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 16, 2016

Laughing at Mockery, Tautology and the Bellman's Fallacy

Get the low-down on mockery, tautology and the "Bellman's Fallacy". Here: https://t.co/iAnfYaOf8F pic.twitter.com/vSKZvNqRpZ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 16, 2016