Strange times in UK & USA. We now live headed by moronic leaders spouting fake news & lies with apparent impunity.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019
Even in the world of science our scientists cannot distinguish between newly unearthed actuality and their establishment's old illusions. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/KxE3N9Avz3
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Tuesday 17 September 2019
Newly Unearthed Reality versus Old Illusions
Monday 9 September 2019
Darwin began stealing the work of others as early as the age of 17-18
In fact aged 18 Darwin even aped the highly idiosyncratic specialist interests of his university mentor Robert Grant on sponges and rushed by capering off to be slyly first to present his own version on them at the Plinian Society at Edinburgh University. Grant was livid. https://t.co/69MSLRIgGR pic.twitter.com/DMlWuRuTde— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2019
Reference : https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330891?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
.
.I read it some time ago. Yes it does. You can find various other books covering the story in detail. Most simply say that Grant was too harsh and the whole affair made Darwin despise the conventions on priority. However, see https://t.co/UI2I61mHEp— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2019
Hugh. On Darwin upsetting Grant and so Grant upsetting Darwin on Darwin's capering @HughDower @BiologiaPensamt This is a most interesting (p. 232 from Darwin's Ghosts by Rebecca Stott) on yet another now missing Darwin paper.From page 232 of Darwin’s Ghosts by Rebecca Stott: pic.twitter.com/sLMadXiOeT— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 10, 2019
References@HughDower @BiologiaPensamt
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 10, 2019
So Gavin de Beer's text was taken from Darwin's biography (written with help of Darwin's son) . What Darwin writes there does no square with what Henrietta Darwin wrote about her father's & Grant's feeling on the matter at all https://t.co/IfCRI4LU2g
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ML8b6hhdujsC&pg=PA232&lpg=PA232&dq=henritetta+darwin+lost+note+1947&source=bl&ots=SUMyuflEYC&sig=ACfU3U2wJY69KuAmmppEve9FnhGqpmF2Rw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjI98jPwcbkAhWQYMAKHU7LCxUQ6AEwFHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=henritetta%20darwin%20lost%20note%201947&f=false
Thursday 5 September 2019
Did Darwin's Establishment Toadying Plagiarism and Associated Lies to Cover it up Cause the Holocaust? Darwin kept God in his plagiarised sanitized version of Matthew's atheist heretical and seditious theory
There is a back hole at the heart of the history of discovery in science. And it hides the truth about how the world's greatest science science fraud by lies and plagiarism played a necessary causal role in the Holocaust.
Charles Darwin, who plagiarised the prior published full theory of evolution by natural selection from the Scot Patrick Matthew, kept his own Christian notion of the "Creator" in his theory replicating book the Origin of Species. There is plenty of sound evidence to argue that Darwin was atheist or agnostic. And I think he most likely was. Yet in some (but not all) of the six editions of The Origin of Species Darwin kept the notion of a so-called "Creator" God, deliberately setting the whole process of natural selection, in motion. He referred to what he called "the Creator" in all editions of the Origin, but in the editions discussed here he clearly wrote that he believed what he called "the Creator" was actually behind designing what Matthew (1831) originally coined the "natural process of selection" to run. Darwin originally re-wrote Matthew's orignal term by way of a four word shuffle to "process of natural slection."
Darwin, if he was to explain Matthew's theory to scientists and the wider public in order to gain its acceptance, was no doubt compelled to plagiarize Matthew's essential four word term - the theory being completely about selection that was natural (as opposed to artificial) and worked as a process to eventually create new varities and species. Associatively, Darwin also no doubt felt compelled to have to plagiarize in the opening Chapter of the Origin of Species (Darwin 1859) Matthew's essential explanatory analogy of differences between varieties of species raised in the wild by nature and those raised artificially by humans. As evidence of his plagiarism in this regard the highly renowned (except by Darwin fact denial superfans) social anthropologist and historian of science, Loren Eiseley, discovered Darwin, in a private essay, replicated Matthew's highly syncratic and original analogy of differences between trees raised in nurseries and those in the wild (see the facts here). Obviously, in the Origin Darwin carefully swapped that total giveaway of his plagiarism for more general examples.
Darwin most probably did all of this to appease the Christian parson naturalists who ran Western universities and other scientific establishments in the 19th century. By doing this, unlike Matthew, whose work he and Wallace shamefully plagiarised and lied about (see my expert peer reviewed academic articles on the topic Sutton 2014 and Sutton 2015 and my book Nullius in Verba) and in my most recent book (Science Fraud) published in 2022 by Curtis Press: Here. Darwin appeased the "Establishment" by keeping sedition and heresy (which ran through Matthew's book like words in Blackpool rock) out of his own replicating book, and in doing that his sly replicating work went mainstream so that he became a household name. On the other hand Matthew (1831 p 367), wrote - what was considered sedition at the time - that the upper classes were, for example, unnaturally selecting their progeny to the point of uselessness in nature:
He also committed gross heresy by mocking the notion of God as a "creator" of species (Matthew 1831 p. 382):
And (Matthew 1831 p.383)
And (Matthew 1831 p.384)
Earlier on page 132, in a footnote, Matthew (1831) also mocked Christian priests:
Darwin did not so alienate the establishment with free speech. Instead he censored himself in his plagiarism of Matthew by effectively writing that what he called "the Creator" created the laws that governed natural selection. We see this in Darwin's Origin of Species 1869 - 5th Edition, p. 424) Also in the same edition published in 1860 in the USA. And it is on page 524-525 of the earlier famous third edition of 1861 (in which Darwin was compelled to cite his influencers under the criticism of his peers) as we see below:
This post is achieved HERE
.
Saturday 31 August 2019
Dawkins' Dysology
But @RichardDawkins is a deluded grinning believer in rubbish. He worships Darwin as an honest original discoverer. He was not. Darwin was a lying opportunistic theory thief who committed the greatest science fraud by plagiarism in cahoots with Wallace: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL https://t.co/yrWvsSBAId
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 31, 2019
Thursday 22 August 2019
Trump and Darwin
Donald Trump - convinced the credulos masses he was super rich, when he was in fact in billions of $$ debt due to business failings. Trump learned people want to be fooled because they are lazy. Charles Darwin knew it. He fooled the world into believing HE was an original genius. pic.twitter.com/wpZL18oGsV
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 22, 2019
Sunday 18 August 2019
Multiple coincidence or not. As the case may be
Could that be a mere coincidence?
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 18, 2019
So both Nivea (face cream) Evian (the water) are anagrams of the word Naive.
In my book "Nullius" I ask scientists to solve the problem of how many claimed multiple mere coincidences sum to the probability they are not actually coincidental. https://t.co/2JYWHOkfU1 pic.twitter.com/fGdQTi7raH
Saturday 17 August 2019
On Naval Timber and Arboriculture
Plainly, it is far from inappropriate - as the proven science fraudster by plagiarism and glory thieving liar Charles Darwin claimed (see Sutton 2015) - that Patrick Matthew's 1831 book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture", containing the original full and complete theory of macroevolution by natural selection, was published in an inappropriately titled book on a different topic.
Emigration by sea is one of our most important modern human achievements leading our evolution from an ape closely tied to the natural world to a species in charge of it. The original & full theory of evolution by natural selection is most appropriately in a book on naval timber pic.twitter.com/6Rx9zDWzna— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 17, 2019
Friday 16 August 2019
The Peterloo Massacre and Charles Darwin
.
.2) The upper/ruling class "Establishment" naturalists Darwin and Wallace & a group of their cronies all despised & feared the Chartists. Darwin fled London to live in Down village because of them. His friends formed armed militias to tackle them: https://t.co/1zhACMJXXq
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 16, 2019
... --->
4) Get the facts rather than let the self interested lying, deceiving, disingenuous upper class establishment keep you and the Scots down with myths and falsehoods.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 16, 2019
1. https://t.co/Q7UBLbCP5n
2. https://t.co/Q7UBLbCP5n
3. https://t.co/Nli3gCig7e
4. https://t.co/CLKiPRrNsj pic.twitter.com/FDzHYYyipQ
Saturday 10 August 2019
Are some facts simply too sad for science or some scientists too simple for sad facts?
Truth is an absolute thing. The fact that those calling themselves scientists can't deal with the independently verifiable truth - facts that newly overturn all they thought was true - is a very sad thing indeed. Are some facts just too sad for science? https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT pic.twitter.com/3nXdZEnBBv
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 10, 2019
Monday 17 June 2019
Bin the Claptrap
(Q) Who is the scientific crossing warden for Darwin, Wallace and their cronies?
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 17, 2019
(A) Patrick Matthew (The Scot robbed by the English Scientific establishment and its treacherous Edinburgh toadies) Bin the claptrap & get the independently verifiable facts: https://t.co/RKbJV7ogAU pic.twitter.com/TS0YatbjrR