#FnarFnar Wonderful stuff. I love the use of humour in this blog to make a point about how people make stuff up & others then credulously swallow it. I might well go mad, but I don't think so 🧐The author is right about barking mad Darwin #DogmaRage though https://t.co/sxKErs1HRG pic.twitter.com/2rCpfudAXP
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 11, 2018
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Friday 11 May 2018
Fun Stuff on Barking Mad Dogma Rage
Wednesday 9 May 2018
Darwin the liar and Darwin dogma rage
I remember the evidence I presented a Conway Hall. A man sitting in the front row was trembling with rage. He pointed a long accusatory finger at me and cried "How dare YOU call Charles Darwin a liar!" Why? Because I'd just shown him why Darwin was a liar: https://t.co/TcAB275QO9 https://t.co/w0uN0CGjWl
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) May 9, 2018
Friday 4 May 2018
Alfred Wallace the species killer
 |
| Alfred Wallace |
Today, new data draws back this dusty Victorian curtain to further prove Darwin's friends and influences had also cited Matthew's 1831 bombshell breakthrough work pre Darwin's and Wallace's 1858/59 supposedly immaculate miraculous dual replications. Yet Matthew - the true originator of macroevolution by natural slection - was no species killer. Patrick Matthew wrote to Darwin in December 1862 "〈I am〉 not satisfied with my existence 〈 〉 to devour & trample upon my 〈fellow〉 creature. I cannot pluck a flower without regarding myself a destroyer."
More related facts in "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret"
"Of course, years earlier the likes of Alfred Wallace went there and killed thousands of…" — Supermythbuster https://t.co/3KwdxYXliv
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 4, 2018
Darwinophile nutjobs hate this kind of thing
I regularly get hate mail about this sort of good thing. Not real hate mail, of course. Not individual letters cut out of newspapers by knife-sharpener morons & stuck on paper to make scary words. Just emails by pseudo-scholarly Darwinophile weirdos.https://t.co/iIfOfqJKMg … pic.twitter.com/V1R06aQwS3
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 4, 2018
Thursday 3 May 2018
Dogma ruins everything
And other independently verifiable, expert peer reviewed, newly discovered, facts unearthed in the 19th century literature with BigData techniques (IDD) that fingers-in-their-ears and hands-over-their eyes Dawkinites and Darwinites blatantly refuse to acceptI would just like to try to explain this quietly and respectfully to you Richard: That is just like trying to explain independently verifiable facts to your credulous rude aggressive worshippers on the @RichardDawkins Foundation. Peer reviwed Facts e,g: https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 3, 2018
1. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05
2. http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66
+
Greedy Alfred Wallace shot 17 apes for their skins!
Letter to an author (sent today) :
Hi [Name removed]
I enjoyed your article on Wallace shooting apes in Sarawak.
I investigated his odd claim (unique in the history of both malarial fever and
scientific breakthrough discovery) to have independently conceived the theory
of macroevolution by natural selection whilst recovering from malarial fever in
Sarawak. It turns out that the naturalist Selby - chief editor of the journal
that published his famous Sarawak paper - had prior read and cited the book
containing what the world's leading experts (including both Darwin and Wallace)
admit contains the complete first publication of the theory of macroevolution
by natural selection. You can read the
independently verifiable facts (and more besides on Darwin) in these open
access peer reviewed scholarly articles and my book:
Wednesday 2 May 2018
Disgusting Behaviour Facilitated by Wikipedia
+Retweeted Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet):— BritSocCrim @ BCU 2018 (@BSCBCU_18) May 2, 2018
Essay Mills (just like Wikipedia) serve as "...fences for stolen ideas, discoveries and other originality" @DrMarkGriffiths @LaxmiAggarwal1 See the disgusting behaviour... https://t.co/6Fe9xfPTE2
Mike Sutton This dreadful behaviour (including a campaign of numerous malicious and malevolent emails sent to my employer and other academics (and more besides) including leading light members of the BSC) followed the BSC's expert peer reviewed publication of deeply disturbing new facts unearthed in the historic publication record on science fraud by plagiarism and lies - using a new method - (1) The new facts uncovered: http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf and (2) the method used to discover it (also expert peer reviewed in a scholalry journal) http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66
+
⚡️ “Stepping up to the plate” Stepping up to the plate +
Hahaha - what a pseudoscientific twerp that homeopath is. I get the same silly Billy daft nonsense daily from Darwin worshipers deeply disturbed by newly unearthed data. One of these #hatemongers was apparently sacked by #EdinburghUniversity for it https://t.co/mhqWdk8MIt
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018
The Social Evolution of Plagiarism: Darwin's pigeons come home to roost
+Well Charles Darwin has set the precedent for massive cheating by plagiarism. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL https://t.co/gZaK4Sn0KS— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 1, 2018
+But it would help if Uni staff first admitted that cheating their way to the top by snakey plagiarism and glory thieving lies is unacceptable - even amongst the most beloved of academic heroes: #TimeToName&ShameCharlesDarwin ?— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018
1. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
+Might I suggest we consider, @LaxmiAggarwal1 therefore, the Market Reduction Approach (#MRA) to plagiarism. It is an approach for tackling all kind of theft (nothing to do with MensRightsMovement by the way). Essay Mills are like fences for stolen ideashttps://t.co/DF4toKDZsx pic.twitter.com/3yNEBN4RPC— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018
DISGUSTING ABUSIVE DEFAMATORY BEHAVIOUR ARCHIVED ON THE COMMENTS SECTION THE 'TIMES NEWSPAPER'S HIGHER EDUCATION' ("THES") BLOG SITE. THESE ABUSIVE AND HARASSING COMMENTS ARE POSTED THERE BY ONE PROLIFIC AND LONG SERVING WIKIPEDIA EDITOR OF WIKIPEDIA'S PATRICK MATTHEW PAGE AND THEIR MIKE SUTTON (CRIMINOLOGIST) PAGE. PERSISTENT AND PROLIFIC HARASSMENT FOLLOWS THE PUBLISHING OF SCHOLARLY JOURNAL EXPERT PEER REVIEWED PAPERS ON THE UNEARTHING OF DARWIN'S PLAGIARISM AND GLORY STEALING LIES http://archive.is/reG0s
THE WIKIPEDIA CULT PAGE ON THEIR REACTION TO THEIR OWN DETECTED PLAGIARISM
+On the weirdo #cult of #Wikipedia. They even have a weird cultish page recording details of their fully evidenced wrongdoing. You can see the proof of its editorial sly plagiarism of some of my original discoveries, and ludicrous excuses for that behaviour https://t.co/BoI2rRegAi pic.twitter.com/zHmaCIePTU— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 24, 2018
#Wikipedia to be named and shamed for its corporate behaviour and the disgusting behaviour of its prolific and long term editors in forthcoming peer reviewed articles on plagiarism, cyberstalking obscene and vile abuse https://t.co/DBRwkWtJn0 pic.twitter.com/jLBYZzYfk6— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) May 2, 2018
Tuesday 1 May 2018
Why Creationists and Muddle Headed Deranged and Conflicted Crypto-Christian Darwin Worshippers Despise Patrick Matthew
(q) Why don't pseudo scholar creationists mention Patrick Matthew the originator of natural selection (who via Loudon would have greatly influenced Blyth)? https://t.co/yegI19XfUn— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 1, 2018
(a) Because Matthew unlike Blyth, Darwin & co was a real atheist who mocked the notion of a creator pic.twitter.com/pf6efhiftt
Don't be misled by desperate neerdowell unemployable pseudo scholarly closet-Christian nutters: Get the independently verifiable facts - that are as proven as fossils do exist in the geological strata - from the historical publication record: Here
http://patrickmatthew.com/Did%20Matthew%20believe%20in%20intelligent%20design%3F.html
+
Now for something completely different.
When a wheelbarrow offers some light relief:
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) May 1, 2018
Sunday 29 April 2018
Getting the message across
COMEDIAN WANTED— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) April 29, 2018
They never believed America's "father" beloved Bill Cosby was a nasty rapist. But he is. It took a decade & a comedian to get message across.
They don't want to believe the beloved Charles Darwin - epitome of honesty - was a nasty lying plagiarist. But he was. pic.twitter.com/hmxgCIsX5v
On "Why scientists need to do more about research fraud"
by Richard P Grant in the Guardian newspaper:
- "The scientific fraudster... lied and cheated their way to a prestigious position..."
- "...they took resources that could have been used by someone else, someone who wasn’t a liar and a cheat."
- "And until there is a change in culture such that people are encouraged to say, “Guys, this isn’t right” – such as I might have been a decade ago – there will continue to be high-profile cases of seriously damaging scientific fraud.
- That’s not good for science, and it’s certainly not good for ordinary scientists."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)