Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday 7 February 2018

Further Misogynistic Obscene Abuse



Archived Here: http://archive.is/zBbpK

Image of comments section on the Patrick Matthew Blog: 

Patrick Matthew: Originator, Immortal Great Thinker and Proven Influencer on Natural Selection 

https://patrickmathew.blogspot.co.uk/
























Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Tuesday 6 February 2018

More On the Weirdo Cult of Wikipedia

+ +
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Saturday 3 February 2018

Bonfire of the Insanities in the last bastions of Darwin worship on Wikipedia


We are defined by what we do. Wikipedia - the world's most reliably unreliable encyclopedia - is defined  as such by what its long term prolific editors do. As are they.

 SOME THINGS IN THE PAST CAN'T BE TAMED
















Outside the contorted newspeak nonsense of the weird cult of Wikipedia editors, back in the real world, my British Society of Criminology journal article was thoroughly peer reviewed by two anonymous experts in the field, and I had to edit and re-submit it accordingly. In typical neerdowell pseudo scholar style, these weird cultists refuse to publish the independently verifiable proof that it was peer reviewed. The reason they are doing this appears to be simply because they cannot bear the independently verifiable newly discovered facts in it that show Charles Darwin was a serial lying plagiariser of Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior-published conception of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Unable to deal with those facts and more besides they are desperately writing deliberate and malevolent falsehoods (archived here) to deny they are in a most highly respected peer reviewed scholarly journal.





Such deliberate and dishonest malevolent and malicious falsehood spreading and fact denial behaviour is not at all untypical behaviour among prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing


This is exactly why, worldwide, all university students are forbidden from citing Wikipedia unless they are referencing its editors academic wrongdoing and persistently reliable inaccuracy.  Here is the fact based independently verifiable proof that the article in question -  The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (the article is here) - was peer reviewed (that proof is here). This published proof, freely available in the public domain, is just one among a multitude of verifiable facts prolific Wikipedia editors of long standing are desperately denying in the last throes of their credulous Darwin worshipping unscholarly and unscientific fact denial behaviour http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume-14/ cult.

Here is the editor's revisions page of the Patrick Matthew page on Wikipedia where these facts are being denied with malevolent and malicious falsehoods https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Matthew&action=history  (archived here because the most senior of Wikipedia editors have been deleting the entire history (verifiable evidence here in their own published words) of what the one prolific Wikipedia editor of long standing, he who has been prolifically editing Wikipedia's page about me - the very same one who sent me the malicious and malevolent obscene misogynist tweet below - has published in one of their weird cultish silly Billy "chat rooms" in the public domain. Of course, what these poor fools don't realise is that on the Internet "delete never means delete". The defamatory published statements, and evidence of Wikipedia's guilt in deleting the lot, have all been archived for forthcoming action.

 More independently verifiable proof from the publication record of malicious and malevolent behaviour of Wikipedia editors, and of  published Wikipedia falsehoods, are available in this portable pdf file. And further details can be found on the relevant page on Patrick Matthew.com . Why are these fact deniers so desperately exposing their dishonesty?  Just Google "Darwin Science Fraud" - what is your first hit? Here is mine at the time of writing.
+
+



+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Wednesday 31 January 2018

Wikipedia is a fake news website run by a weird cult of ne'er-do-wells


As delusional as the cult of Scientology, see the hard evidence of exactly what the cult of Wikipedia is up to. Witness their punishments of members and the required grovelling of those punished. Witness the fact deletion history and other coverups as they admit deleting the evidence of what they have done on their own history pages. Witness the vile and obscene communications published by their long-standing and prolific editors. Be astounded by their delusional witch hunting, publication of fact denial malicious falsehoods, biased agenda and other gross pseudo scholarship. All these facts are as independently verifiable as the existence of fossils in the geological strata, by virtue of the fact they exist in the archived publication record. They are available on this handy portable PDF  with more details at the bottom of this page on the PatrickMatthew.com website .


  • In their own words, Wikipedia editors claim the underlying philosophy of their delusion cult is that "experts are scum" Here   (archived here)
  • Wikipedia editors plagiarise my discovery of the selfish gene myth and refuse to cite the original publication of it  (archived here)
  • Wikipedia editors caught in a live online 'veracity trap' experiment persistently deleting independently verifiable facts from the historic publication record and serially lying to claim the publication of them does not even exist: here (archived here)

+
+

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Sunday 28 January 2018

Jimmy Wales Maintains Wikipedia Editors are not Malicious or Malevolent

+


BBC journalist Zeinab Badawi hosts panel on fake news with Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, Joseph Kahn, managing editor of the New York Times, Anna Belkina, deputy chief editor of RT, and Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party and son of assassinated prime minister Benazir Bhutto.



https://youtu.be/ZmOMadRHpvk?t=568
Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Saturday 27 January 2018

Introducing the "Trunchbull Reflex"

When Charles Darwin brazenly lied that no naturalist / no one whatsoever had read Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of natural selection before he replicated it (see peer reviewed article on the proof here), Charles Darwin was apparently operating under "Trunchbull's Too Bad To Be Believable Reflex" (Trunchbull Reflex)


#TrunchbullReflex

+


+
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

Wednesday 24 January 2018

Whac-a-Mole Wikipedia

The Patrick Matthew page on Wikipedia has been taken over by those obsessed, corrupt and pseudo-scholarly malicious falsehood spreaders known as 'The Darwin Deification Lobby'

+
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Thank You Google: DMCA Takedown!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels:

Tuesday 23 January 2018

We May Now Have to Add Darwin to the List of the Most Famous Plagiarizing Science Fraudsters

This document contains independently verifiable evidence from the publication record that the original findings in Mike Sutton’s (2014) book ‘Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s greatest secret’ have been interpreted as being so significant the author’s write that Darwin’s name may now have to be added to the list of the world's most famous plagiarising science fraudsters.

‘French astronomer Pierre-Simon, Marquis de Laplace was suspected of stealing ideas “outrageously, right and left, whenever he could,” and German mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz was also suspected of similar acts. Italian physicist and astronomer Galileo Galilei was  said to “shamelessly” have stolen ideas from German astronomer Johannes Kepler and others. Likewise, Graeco-Egyptian mathematician and astronomer Claudius Ptolemy, as well as Dalton, Lavoisier, and Pascal, may have all been involved, and possibly guilty of, some form of deceit in their work. 80'
‘80. Given Sutton’s previously mentioned work, Darwin may have to be added to this list’

 See the full scholarly conclusion Here: 
http://patrickmatthew.com/onewebmedia/Sutton2%20Cited%20Fraud%20and%20Scientific%20Misconduct.pdf


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Monday 22 January 2018

Question on the origin of Darwin's discovery

On Monday, 28 March 2016 The Nottingham Post  ran with the story on the 'New Data' on Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's Plagiarising Science Fraud. The story was covered by feature writer Jeremy Lewis.'Question on the origin of Darwin's discovery'. Jeremy Lewis, The Nottingham Post. pp. 20-21, March 28, 2016.

Jeremy Lewis: Feature writer, Nottingham Post
For the benefit of those researching in the field of Darwin plagiarism studies, the following photographs are of the story. 




A compendium of other newspaper stories on the "New Data" can be found on the news page of 
PatrickMatthew.Com



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)