Is Dawkins @TeessideSitP more likely to commit an atrocity than a MORE RATIONAL atheist? https://t.co/mVMl5LQK6k pic.twitter.com/xqjqWTvoBC— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) October 3, 2015
Saturday, 3 October 2015
Is Richard Dawkins More Atrocity Prone Than Matthewist Atheists?
Was Voltaire right? Could believing in the absurd Darwinist creation story of Darwin's and Wallace's (1858) dual immaculate conceptions of Matthew's (1831) complex prior published theory of the 'natural process of selection' and Matthew's unique explanatory examples and the same four words he uniquely used to name it, four-word-shuffled by Darwin in 1859 to 'process of natural selection', whilst they were influenced and surrounded by naturalists they knew who read it, yet claimed, when they are proven to have known otherwise, that no such naturalists existed, mean you are more likely than Matthewian atheists to commit atrocities?