Sunday 3rd April 2022 we see thee fourth instalment of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" Here
Get the book at Amazon Here
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Sunday 3rd April 2022 we see thee fourth instalment of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" Here
Get the book at Amazon Here
Sunday 27 April The Scottish Sunday Express 3rd instalment of the serialisation of Science Fraud (the book).
Read it here.
What are you waiting for? This is an international disgrace. The so-called "Darwin Industry" has been profiteering of a massive lie since 1859!
The history of science and discovery is corrupted by fake facts.
Students must write the wrong answers to be marked right in their essays and exams. This is massively embarrassing.
Read the facts and then help to set the record straight.
Available on Amazon books: Here.
Sunday March 20 2022 saw the second part of the on-going serialisation of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" in the Scottish national press via the Scottish Sunday Express.
. .
The article can be read here.
.
.If you live in #Scotland you could do worse than buy the Scottish Sunday Express . The @CurtisPress_ science book that 100% proves Charles #Darwin committed the world's biggest science fraud by theft of an entire Scottish theory & lied is being serialized https://t.co/9CdwsGdpLI
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 26, 2022
Another #Scottish national press instalment of "Dr Sutton Presents" in condensed instalments of bombshell data findings that prove #CharlesDarwin was the world's biggest science fraudster by plagiarism of a prior published theory. This changes everything! https://t.co/utH4HGRNN9
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 26, 2022
Read the introduction in the Scottish Sunday Express: Here
Read the serialised, hugely truncated and specially edited for the Scottish Express Chapter 1 HERE
Buy "Science Fraud" Here on Amazon, from the Publisher Curtis Press Direct, or order from your local bookshop.
This blogpost of 14 March 2022 is archived HERE
On Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental of instinctive powers."
"Science Fraud" not only lists those who actually cited Matthew's 1831 book before 1858, it also lists (List 2) those who BigData research reveals were apparently first (after Matthew 1831) to go into print with apparently unique "Matthewisms". Being apparently "first to be second" with an apparently unique "Matthewism" they are said in short to be "F2B2".
Thomas Laycock is one of the names in my List 2. Not only does "Science Fraud" reveal his works on the theme of organic evolution, it also reveals who he associated with who were associates of Charles Darwin.
But today (11 March 2022) I discovered something more in my continued research into this area. Today, I found that without citing Matthew (1831) Laycock (1832) wrote extensively aping Matthew's work on his observations on the fact that trees that are artificially selected by humans are of inferior quality to those growing in the wild. Here.
This provides yet more confirmatory evidence to support the F2B2 hypothesis stated in Science Fraud, the book.
In my most recent book "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" there are many examples where those in List 2 are found to have been interested in the same lines of enquiry as Matthew, or to have later written about observations he first made, but without citing. Some were F2B2 and later in other publications they then actually cited Matthew's bombshell book "On Naval Timber". All before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own.
Schacter (2012) Provides further information about Laycock (who first introduced himself to me when I used the IDD method to see if anyone was F2B2 with Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental or instinctive powers"). Amazingly, although he wrote on Matthew's (1831) topic of organic evolution and used Matthew's apparently original term without citing him Schacter (p.115) reveals that Laycock wrote on the topic of instinct the same concept that Matthew had pioneered.
Method
Schacter's (2012) book "Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory" was found simply by typing the following search term into Google's standard search page: "Laycock" "Matthew" "Naval Timber" as in the image below.
The result I got today 13.03.2022 is archived Here. And if you scroll down the Google results first page of hits you will find Schacter's excellent book comes up.Next if we take the same three terms as above - in inverted commas exactly as above - but click for Google to search on books we find Schacter's earlier book also covered this topic. The image below reveals all.
Today (07 March 2022) The Daily Squib sets the record straight on the Charles - The Dirty Plagiarist -Darwin, the "Darwin Industry" and its enablers - such as the fact censoring and malicious disinformation spreading pseudo-scholars of Wikipedia. Here (archived here) .
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 7, 2022.
.Origin of the Theory of the Origin of Species Was Not the Origin of the Theory of the Origin of the Specieshttps://t.co/FIvSj5NlYy#charlesdarwin #science pic.twitter.com/bhuT7FrbB1
— Daily Squib News (@DAILYSQUIB) March 7, 2022
Origin of the Theory of the Origin of Species Was Not the Origin of the Theory of the Origin of the Specieshttps://t.co/FIvSj5NlYy#charlesdarwin #science pic.twitter.com/bhuT7FrbB1
— Daily Squib News (@DAILYSQUIB) March 7, 2022
.
. https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/56010861382336513?lang=en-GB . .Conspiracy theorists are those who claim coverups whenever insufficient data exists to support what they're sure is true.
— Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson) April 7, 2011
This is completely unacceptable ... this fact denial approach to Matthew's theory of natural selection has been pushed for long enough by the likes of Wikipedia. https://t.co/9BwStVqZEj
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher with Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) February 19, 2022
😂 Is Amazon the beast? Is it Sutton? Or is it Darwin? Or Matthew? Or is it Wallace? In the name of God who the Hell is the Beast? Buy the book and read the shocking "revelations" in it to find out. Is this the "end of days" for Charles Darwin? 😈💀
Buy this bombshell book on Amazon for the price of the "mark of the beast" and exorcise - or else exercise, your demons now.
Someone using George Beccaloni's pseudonym Megaloblatta on February 16 2022 entered a link to typical Darwin fact hating superfan nonsense on the Wikipedia page for Patrick Matthew (relevant Wikipedia history page archived here.)
Beccaloni (claims to be employed by the "Darwin Trust") that appears to be true but he also pretends he is an objective scholar on the question of Matthew and Darwin. However, verifiable empirical evidence proves he is the opposite.
Facts about George Beccaloni and Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory
Firstly before commenting on my research into the story of Matthew, Darwin and Wallace George Becalloni dismissed it as untrue on a Richard Dawkins fans website and was caught in the act by Bob Butler my then publisher and CEO of Thinker Media. There, caught red handed Beccaloni was confronted by Butler and so was forced to admit he was commenting negatively on an academic book he had not even read. Therefore, anything Beccaloni writes about my research after that serious academic irregularity is worse than just tainted by his proven completely biased and desperate unprofessionally childish fact denial behaviour. It is contaminated by Beccaloni's proven prejudiced pseudoscientific thinking.
The 2022 post "Science Fraud" Darwinite fight-back against the facts is likely to ramp up over the coming months. Already George Beccaloni an employee of The Darwin Trust, no less, is getting published links on the Wikipedia page of Patrick Matthew to his ludicrous blog site. Wikipedia is not supposed to link to blog sites, under its own rules. But the Darwin horde is running the Patrick Matthew and Charles Darwin pages on Wikipedia, and one of them is proven by his own hand to be not only dishonest but employed by the Darwin Trust!
Megaloblatta publishing on Wikipedia on Beccaloni's recent published activity on to a blog post written by Beccaloni on his own site here
George Beccaloni caught red-handed dishonestly pretending - like any other desperate and panicking pseudoscientific fanatic does - to know the factual content of a book he had not even read here.
Beccaloni's subsequent blog on the topic he clearly proved himself untrustworthy to review. Here.
Why is this being added to Wikipedia today? Is it because Darwin superfans like Beccaloni, the world over, are in a fact denial panic about my new history of science book "Science Fraud" and the mass of press coverage it is receiving?
I geck them with empirical facts. They hate that, these fanatical members of the Darwinite Zombie Horde.
This page is archived for researchers, journalists and anyone else investigating the dishonesty at the core of the so-called "Darwin Industry" and its activities in publishing to promote falsehoods, mischievous misrepresentations of scholarly research and fact-denial censorship https://archive.is/QHr9H
Full conversation with Dr. Mike Sutton: https://t.co/XMc8ZwWNkP @CurtisPress_ @brandnewtube 25% off for our viewers. pic.twitter.com/ipa67upYEo
— Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) February 16, 2022