This is a public information Tweet on skin cancer. Don't use a sunbed unless you wish to look like a giant racist, misogynistic "misspeaking" panda-eyed tangerine baby with a ludicrous comb across. https://t.co/vbGKyttp5E— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 21, 2018
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Saturday 21 July 2018
A Public Health Information Tweet On Skin Cancer and Donald Trump
According to the Independent newspaper Donald Trump's ludicrous appearance may be driving down visits to skin cancer-bed salons
Friday 20 July 2018
Itchy Beard Day
+Claim: "Darwin & Wallace had amazing dual independent conceptions of the prior published theory their friends, influencers and Wallace's editor had prior read and then cited."— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 20, 2018
Rational reply: "itchy beard!" It's #ItchyBeardDay
20th July is international Itchy Beard Day pic.twitter.com/FOKBNtF3o3
+
#ItchyBeard Where on Earth did this expression of skepticism originate? https://t.co/5dZVdoxFlY pic.twitter.com/OXwf1OQgFQ
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 20, 2018
Wednesday 18 July 2018
Darwin never lied he just "misspoke": Itchy Beard!
+Perhaps, just like Hillary Clinton and now Donald Trump, Charles Darwin never lied at all now. Perhaps he only "misspoke" then? #Beard! https://t.co/BVl8R6w9Fk— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 18, 2018
+Misspoke? Misspoke?— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 18, 2018
Out comes the Clintonesque "I misspoke" nonsense yet again. Oh for heaven's sake. Clearly Trump is lying. He never accidentally said the wrong thing. He deliberately said the wrong thing. Why on Earth can't politicians tell the truth? https://t.co/OvRKJd8zgM
Facts are facts and lies are lies.
https://youtu.be/F-TA4GEHUV4?t=20
Monday 16 July 2018
Don't be Like Trump and his Ignorant Followers: Say "Nullius in Verba"
Darwin was a prolific plagiarist and he lied to cover up the fact he and Wallace committed the World's greatest science fraud by plagiary.
+— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 16, 2018
Remember Nullius in Verba #NulliusInVerba
Demand verifiable evidence you can check for yourself: https://t.co/yjnBYK6aji pic.twitter.com/pgMrzyHx3U
Remember @RichardDawkins & Darwin fans. Never rely alone upon the mere opinionated advice of any guru. Check the independently verifiable facts for yourself. Adopt the motto of the Royal Society: #NulliusInVerba They exist in books for your brain to weigh https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT https://t.co/m3VkfbWuLt— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 3, 2018
Thursday 12 July 2018
On Harassment of Academics
Read my Amazon book review of Ernst's SCAM here
Harassment of academics, and those associated with their disturbing original discoveries, @DrMarkGriffiths @EdzardErnst @lizmorrish @TeessideSitP @SidRodrigues @BiologiaPensamt is a weirdly unexplored area of #criminology and the sociology of science. More research needed. pic.twitter.com/RbQgpQ36JQ— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 12, 2018
Saturday 7 July 2018
Who Do We Think We Are? Big Data N=All and Mentions in Parliament Cited in Hansard
Is is interesting to see that the same Big Data technology that for the first time (Sutton 2014, 2017) detected Patrick Matthew's (1831) book and bombshell theory of evolution by natural selection being cited in the historic literature by Darwin's and Wallace's influencers and also by their influencer's influencers (all many years before Darwin's and Wallace's 1858 Linnean Society Scandal supposedly miraculous immaculate independent conception replications of the same theory) enables me to see that my Market Reduction Approach to theft and my name have been mentioned in UK Parliamentary answers. Moreover, it is very good to see that a number of my co-authors down the years are similarly mentioned in Hansard. Who do we think we are?
HANSARD (UK PARLIAMENT) MENTIONS
1. My Market Reduction Approach (MRA) and me (Mike Sutton) twice Here. Also named once here for UK Government contract award (Both main mentions for research archived in full here and here and named for Govt. contract award here)
2. Paul Ekblom: Once Here (archived in full here)
3. Mike Levi three times Here
4. Mark Griffiths ten times Here
+
+On just one small part of our disciplinary legacy. So "Who do we think we are"? @DrMarkGriffiths @PaulEkblom1 Big Data and mentions in UK Parliament Hansard https://t.co/GcdmD6kYmy pic.twitter.com/3amaLzAUXz— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 7, 2018
So who do YOU think YOU are?
Who do you think you are: https://t.co/sFNkpM8MHm— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 7, 2018
Friday 6 July 2018
Myth Busting, Plagiarism and Lie Detecting Big Data Criminology
In terms of myth busting long cherished science myths, Big Data technology led to the devastating new bombshell discovery that Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud by lies, plagiarism and glory theft of Patrick Matthew's prior-published theory, which their friends/editors/influencers and influencer's influencers read and cited and that Richard Dawkins never coined the term 'selfish gene' nor the concept that is now a biological meme, and so much more besides.
1. Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest Secret (Vol. 1 Paperback book).
2. The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (Expert peer reviewed academic article).
3. On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis (Expert peer reviewed science journal article).
4. Using Date Specific Searches on Google Books to Disconfirm Prior Origination Knowledge Claims for Particular Terms, Words, and Names (Expert peer reviewed social science journal article) .
This is a seminal work on Big Data. I have written on the topic myself with professor Mark Griffiths, who
recommended the book to me.
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier, the authors of ‘Big Data’, do an excellent job of telling us exactly
what Big Data is and how what we currently have is rooted in historic exercises in trying to make sure that as far as
is possible N=all. Of course, N (the sample) seldom does equal all, but what we call Big Data gets substantially
nearer to that than purposively limited statistical sampling.
What I most like about this book is the fact it provides so many examples of how Big Data reveals insights that could
not have been obtained in any other way. But most importantly, the authors then explain the importance of the
results obtained. For anyone interested, as am I, in social network theory then pages 30-31 are a must read.
The last chapters of the book reveal the limitations of Big Data and the inherent danger of relying upon predictive
algorithms – particularly in the fields of criminology, policing and criminal justice.
I cannot recommend the book more highly. Buy it. Read it. Think about it. Be enlightened. It might well change the
way you think about data.
1. Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest Secret (Vol. 1 Paperback book).
2. The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (Expert peer reviewed academic article).
3. On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis (Expert peer reviewed science journal article).
4. Using Date Specific Searches on Google Books to Disconfirm Prior Origination Knowledge Claims for Particular Terms, Words, and Names (Expert peer reviewed social science journal article) .
This book @Viktor_MS @kncukier is essential reading for #Criminology.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 6, 2018
Anyone exploring network theory or the benefits and potential dangers of predictive offending, victim algorithms and other #BigDataCriminology should read it. Here is my Amazon review. https://t.co/qeoJ4bSHnI pic.twitter.com/EKrueBk8FX
6 July 2018
Format: Paperback|Verified Purchase
recommended the book to me.
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier, the authors of ‘Big Data’, do an excellent job of telling us exactly
what Big Data is and how what we currently have is rooted in historic exercises in trying to make sure that as far as
is possible N=all. Of course, N (the sample) seldom does equal all, but what we call Big Data gets substantially
nearer to that than purposively limited statistical sampling.
What I most like about this book is the fact it provides so many examples of how Big Data reveals insights that could
not have been obtained in any other way. But most importantly, the authors then explain the importance of the
results obtained. For anyone interested, as am I, in social network theory then pages 30-31 are a must read.
The last chapters of the book reveal the limitations of Big Data and the inherent danger of relying upon predictive
algorithms – particularly in the fields of criminology, policing and criminal justice.
I cannot recommend the book more highly. Buy it. Read it. Think about it. Be enlightened. It might well change the
way you think about data.
Tuesday 3 July 2018
Childish Darwin and Wallace Worshippers Should Grow Up
Spot on! And Darwin's and Wallace's ludicrous dual miracle of supposed independent immaculate conceptions of a prior published theory are not real either. They are newly proven by newly discovered data to be sly excuses for plagiarising science fraud: https://t.co/yjnBYJOyUI pic.twitter.com/fJNpXLCfRj— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 3, 2018
Friday 29 June 2018
BIG DATA IS VERY USEFUL
I was delighted to attend the Rollys-Royce ball last week. Because that company uses #BigData very effectively. Today #BigData is the Rolls-Royce of data. Why? Big Data is keeping us safe and adds billions to our economy. pic.twitter.com/XKvH9UcXg8
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 29, 2018
Tuesday 26 June 2018
Linnean Society Scandal: Alfred R. Wallace the Very Silly Paranormal Believer, Anti-Vaxxer, Great Ape Killer, Myth Maker, Plagiarist, Extortionist and Fraudster. History Repeating Itself in 2018
Scientists swallowed Wallace Myth for +150 years.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 27, 2018
In light of facts - old and also new - they are angry (and behaving disreputably) that I prove them to be #VerySilly indeed:
1. Wallace believed adamantly in ghosts: https://t.co/hW8BZ93bfx
2. Harassment: https://t.co/yyO3KtehdB pic.twitter.com/ulBB1r4LjJ
In 1858, Darwin and Wallace had their papers on evolution by natural selection read before the Linnean Society and then published in its journal (see Darwin, C. R. and Wallace, A. R. 1858. 'On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection.' Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of
Thanks to my research with the Big Data IDD method we now newly know that, as opposed to the old Darwinite tale - started as a plagiarising glory theft lie told by Darwin to deny what he had been told by Matthew - of none, that a total of seven naturalists read and cited Matthew's (1831) book pre-1858 (See Sutton 2015 for an expert peer reviewed science journal article to get the independently verifiable New Data).
Wallace was not cheated by Darwin in 1858 for discovery of natural selection. Both cheated Matthew. I discovered the editor of Wallace's Sarawak pape read & cited Matthew's original discovery before 1858, and Wallace extorted money & doctored biography SEE https://t.co/yjb17PHfU9 pic.twitter.com/8qSQAoc8DL— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 26, 2018
Wallace's original letter (here) was doctored in his autobiography to remove the incriminating words ‘immediately’ and ‘assistance’. Get the story here.
The Linnean Society has a history of facilitating plagiarism debacles
In a recent Linnean Society paper Dagg, whose blogs and online comments reveal he is apparently rather obsessed with several different areas of my work and read it all on this topic from 2014 onward - because he has commented on it ad nauseum - plagiarised my original (Sutton 2014a, 2014b) discovery that in 1842 Selby (Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper editor) read and cited Matthew's (1831) prior published discovery of macroevolution by natural selection He then bragged on Wikipedia (of all the seedy pseudo-scholarly places) to the malicious cyber stalker Derry that he failed to cite me.
Scholars interested in plagiarism and other academic misconduct can find the archived records of this shameful published behaviour and a great deal more on the relevant page on the Patrick Matthew website (here). Please be cautioned dear readers, because that page on PatrickMatthew.com contains an imbedded tweet and links to the Times Higher Education website archive of obscene abusive misogynist and anal insertion language published by Derry, who - incidentally - was dismissed from Edinburgh university for constantly weirdly harassing a young female teacher and many other people in Scotland, and officials of the National Lottery Heritage fund, for their association with my original new IDD Big Data discoveries about Patrick Matthew. As the PatrickMatthew.com page on Dawinite abuse and harassment reveals Derry has now escalated his weirdly obsessive cyberstalking harassment from harassing anyone who dares to write a positive review of my book to bombarding my friends, associates and leading criminologists and other academics with poison pen emails (some containing abuse language - many have been forwarded to me pending legal action) to now harassing one of my young female PhD students and also my co-author on the IDD method Professor Mark Griffiths. In his Linnean Society plagiarising paper Dagg thanks Derry for his help! In his Linnean Journal article, Dagg also thanks Mike Weale for his help. Weale, like Derry has attempted, also with absolute zero success, to harass me into silence on the significance of the New Data - and how other Darwinite academics have dealt with it badly by resigning from the editorial board of a science journal that published it - by emailing senior management at my university with ludicrous and childish malicious accusations. I will be addressing all these highly embarrassing disreputable issues before the press, academics and on camera in December 2018. See the embedded tweet below for details.
+Among university academics suicide & mental illness is increasing. When other scholars gang-up in a malicious harassment vendetta of an academic's management, simply to try to bury embarrassing new discoveries, the vicious story must be told. I tell mine: https://t.co/4xWGfK4cG0 pic.twitter.com/myYdvzRSDZ— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 15, 2018
WALLACE WAS CLEARLY A CREDULOUS IDIOT (just like all the daft-as-a-brush scientists who unquestioningly swallowed his malarial fever cognitive enhancement rubbish), HE NOT ONLY BELIEVED IN GHOSTS AND SEANCES BUT WAS ALSO AN ARDENT PSEUDO SCHOLARLY ANTI-VAXXER
"Wallace's statistics seemed impressive but the committee members found numerous errors that seemed unworthy of someone of Wallace's reputation. Not only did Wallace and his fellow anti-vaccinationists ignore statistics that failed to support their view but many of the statistical tables were highly selective (doubly embarrassing since Wallace had accused the pro-vaccinationists of doing the same thing).Wallace was caught off-guard by the findings and was forced to admit that many of the statistics that he had presented were worthless."
"Even in the 20th century, anti-vaccination societies continued to proliferate and attracted numerous "star" supporters including Wallace and George Bernard Shaw (who wrote that vaccination was "a particularly filthy piece of witchcraft"), as well as health faddists, anti-vivisectionists, trade unionists, etc."
(ref: Providentia)
+What can we learn from the "vaccination wars" about current anti-vaccination #dysology? @EdzardErnst? Fact that C19th ghost & seance brigade were anti-vaxers and convinced A. R. Wallace is interesting— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) June 28, 2018
Two articles
Part 1. https://t.co/Iqnhgg8vFj
Part 2. https://t.co/nlspMytbAm pic.twitter.com/SUHlTOTiAV
Q. What do Trump and the plagiarist Alfred Russel Wallace have in common?— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 27, 2018
A. Trump is an anti-vaxer and so was Wallace.
On Trump: https://t.co/1Q5o86ldZZ
On Wallace (who also believed in ghosties - silly man) https://t.co/YvWhFg7f6i
More on Wallace: https://t.co/x5ZdJK8YF2 pic.twitter.com/tk7F9N7v8L
+
+In addition to believing in ghosts & believing this was a picture of the ghost of his mother, the plagiarist (who claimed malarial fever led to his indpendent concepetion of Matthew's prior-published theory) Wallace was an anti-vaxxer who did much harm: https://t.co/G7DXefA9V6 pic.twitter.com/Zib6Te2awv— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 27, 2018
+Linnean society honoured Wallace for his plagiarism of prior published theory of evolution by natural selection (he claimed he conceived it via malarial brain fever... honestly you could make this stuff up). His anti-vaccination argument still used today https://t.co/nfkBQSPvWU https://t.co/W2TJmbz4sc— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 28, 2018
+Once fired by their employer, cyber stalker harassers of young women and older men @DrMarkGriffiths are known to escalate their behavior to the point where they injure - or worse - kill people. https://t.co/5QW0YCEy6N— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 30, 2018
As someone who has been obsessively and persistently targeted by a malicious campaign of stalking and harassment at my workplace @DrMarkGriffiths @TeessideSitP by rabid Darwin cultists from other universities this has been important for rebuffing them. https://t.co/icMMOyZIgT
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 3, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)