A. R. Wallace ludicrously claimed malarial fever induced his miraculous independent conception of Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural selection. If alive, the plagiarist & ghost believer would have loved to scare his silly self here https://t.co/uBONIdS0j8
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 20, 2018
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Wednesday 20 June 2018
A. R. Wallace the ludicrous and delusional plagiarizing tableturner
Monday 18 June 2018
Facts are facts
+Does it include my orignal 2014, discovered, peer reviewed and published fact that Selby (editor of the journal that published Wallace's Sarawak paper) had prior read and cited Matthew's prior origination of the theory of evolution by natural selection? https://t.co/qPsB49TRcE
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) June 18, 2018
+Google Citations uses brilliant #BigData technology to see how many times (and where) your publications have been cited. That Big Data adds gravitas to endorsement of an original Big Data research method & dreadfully upsetting new discoveries made with it https://t.co/1Ye8Tu8TAM
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 20, 2018
Friday 15 June 2018
The story of a malicious academic vendetta is to be told
+Among university academics suicide & mental illness is increasing. When other scholars gang-up in a malicious harassment vendetta of an academic's management, simply to try to bury embarrassing new discoveries, the vicious story must be told. I tell mine: https://t.co/4xWGfK4cG0 pic.twitter.com/myYdvzRSDZ
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 15, 2018
Knowing the stresses faced by academics in the modern #ToxicUniversity, those with commercial & ideological interests to bury the verifiable scientific facts he revealed went after him at his place of work intimidating his managers. They succeeded in making him ill. @lizmorrish pic.twitter.com/TzmzsXaHCH
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 15, 2018
Wednesday 13 June 2018
Big Data, Evolution of Human Thought, Spread of Ideas and Evidence for Plagiarism
+Spot on! Thank you: @Viktor_MS & @kncukier "We can now discover when certain words of phrases were used for the first time, or became popular, knowledge that spreads new light on the spread of ideas and the evolution of human thought..."— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 13, 2018
Confirmed : https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/6A3sM3m3sK
+Author boasts of #plagiarism in #LinneanJournal of my #culturomics original unearthing in 19th century #TextualFossilRecord that Selby (Wallace's Sarawak paper editor) cited Matthew's prior publication of the theory of macroevolultion by natural selection https://t.co/ckeNLx1kVY pic.twitter.com/Bo3NyyMM30— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 13, 2018
+#WikipediaHahaha https://t.co/OTKDko8VcG
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 14, 2018
#LinneanSocietyScandal
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 14, 2018
1st July 1858 reading of Darwin's & Wallace's Linnean Society papers.
Both failed to cite Matthew's theory they replicated.
2018 Dagg's Linnean Society paper (arguing that neither plagiarized the originator) plagiarizes my Selby cited Matthew discovery! pic.twitter.com/35kC9UEXg8
Saturday 9 June 2018
The Linnean Journal Scandal: A Tale of Stalking, Intimidation and Plagiarism
+Knowing the stresses faced by academics in the modern #ToxicUniversity, those with commercial & ideological interests to bury the verifiable scientific facts he revealed went after him at his place of work intimidating his managers. They succeeded in making him ill. @lizmorrish pic.twitter.com/TzmzsXaHCH— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 15, 2018
I HAVE A SIMILAR STORY OF NASTY, MALICIOUS VENDETTA HARASSING AND INTIMIDATION OF UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND TOP PROFESSORS TO TELL AND I WILL BE TELLING IT ALL IN DECEMBER 2018 (SEE DETAILS)
+One of these nasty #stalker #trolls severely intimidates one of my PhD students, @TeessideSitP another tries to have me fired for discovering disruptiv new data, then their 3rd associate plagiarizes my discovery and publishes it in Linnean Journal! https://t.co/T8aN5JhTyW pic.twitter.com/DHQVxWPhzQ— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) June 9, 2018
+The issues at stake - notably academic freedom - is something Laurie Taylor is interested in @JayneEEgerton The story has many dimension but the institutional backdrop should interest all academics that care about academic integrity as much as @Criminotweet does— Andy Wilson (@a8drewson) June 7, 2018
+Never mess with a former Home Office Senior Research officer trained for years in PR to deal patiently with intimidation and harassment.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 9, 2018
Just for starters, my story is now to be included as a published case study in the field of #CriticalUniversityStudies https://t.co/rHHqQjVzx9 pic.twitter.com/iMhrx6ejPd
+In December 2018 I will be publicly shaming the recent plagiarism and pseudo scholarly Wikipedia bragging about the plagiarism of my discovery about Selby having read and cited Matthew. The #LinneanJournalScandal : https://t.co/rHHqQjVzx9— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 11, 2018
+#CriticalUniversityStudies: "...dedication to truth, fair play, and reasonable debate, of freedom of thought, ... that is now being cavalierly dismantled by people who do not have the wit to understand its meaning or significance for our civilization." https://t.co/DzE0sHxd9A!— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 12, 2018
+#Wikipedia editors make stuff up. This is supposed to be about me. But they just made some of it up. Why? Wikipedia is hilarious. Yet you still get people who believe what it publishes. Why? No better than the Sunday Sport. Probably far less factual. https://t.co/KsvUzUkwDR pic.twitter.com/pGsX3MHZeU— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 19, 2017
They believe (by denying the facts of the New Data) that Darwin and Wallace had immaculate independent conceptions of the very theory their friends, influencers and influencer's influencers read and then cited before Darwin and Wallace replicated it and claimed it as their own pic.twitter.com/jXGOMHurY9— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) June 13, 2018
Friday 8 June 2018
Google A.I is Reducing Google Functionality
A.I has now lost even more of Google's earlier ability to find hidden texts in historic public record. Unless you know reference it no longer detects anything that forms the new uncovered references data in the Matthew, Darwin & Wallace Plagiarism Scandal https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 8, 2018
Some peer reviewed papers on the scandal and what I uniquely found with the IDD method
1. http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf
2. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05
+
As a criminologist, I am rather surprised my research into illicit markets for stolen goods & stolen ideas would lead to a discovery that apparently confirms fears #ArtificialIntelligence (#AI) poses big problems for important human knowledge progression https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/myqEDzSpbt
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 8, 2018
Wednesday 6 June 2018
The Matthew, Darwin and Wallace Linnean Society Scandal: A Most Unsettling Science Story
"To datafy a phenomenon is to put it in a quantified format so it can be tabulated and analysed."
That is exactly what I did in 2013 when I originally unearthed the fact, and published it in 2014 in my book 'Nullius in verba: Darwin's greatest secret' and a peer reviewed article, that besides Loudon (a naturalist) six other naturalists, out of a total of 25 people - many of whom were agriculturalists - all of them (apart from Loudon) originally unearthed by me, cited Matthew's (1831) book before Darwin's and Wallace's Linnean Society journal replication of his theory without citation.
Prior to my research, the world's leading Darwin scholars, including Royal Society Darwin Medal winners de Beer and Mayer, wrote in esteemed scholarly published texts that they believed that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas before Darwin and Wallace replicated them in 1858. I bust that beloved science myth by identifying seven naturalists who did. Six of the seven are my original discoveries.
Therefore, when Dagg used my data on Selby in the Linnean Journal in 2018 without citing me as its discover it is my opinion that he plagiarised it. More so, by dong that he has given the impression in the Linnean Journal that he discovered it first. Moreover, Dagg knew that I did. But I published it first and Dagg well knows that fact because he has been obsessing about my work in this area and obsessing about my work on other unrelated topics in his online publications since 2014. On this serious issue, the tweets in this blog post direct you to an earlier longer post that provides all the details in this latest scene in the Matthew, Darwin and Wallace Linnean Society Scandal.
+@UnsetSciStories Here is an unsettling science story— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 6, 2018
Academic uses my originally unearthed finding. Fails to cite me for it in Linnean Journal @BiolJLinnSoc Then brags on #Wikipedia about it to a malicious cyber stalker intimidator of my PhD student! https://t.co/tvgtt3FThh pic.twitter.com/7PIoU6z4iS
+This is what they tried to do to me & still try to do. @lizmorrish How a victim tells their story with all its implications in a way that does not allow them to be falsely portrayed as a nutter with a persecution complex is a challenge to be PR managed. https://t.co/E8sdLN6Sbt— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 7, 2018
+Yes I am Liz. And that narrative is to be fully supported by independently verifiable paper letter, newsprint, email and archived website and blog site evidence. I will share it with you for your important groundbreaking academic research into this area.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 7, 2018
+The issues at stake - notably academic freedom - is something Laurie Taylor is interested in @JayneEEgerton The story has many dimension but the institutional backdrop should interest all academics that care about academic integrity as much as @Criminotweet does— Andy Wilson (@a8drewson) June 7, 2018
On camera, public meeting, press and senior academics present:
I have & will present data @TeessideSitP re malicious fact denial toadying shock troops for preservation of sacred science myths preying on "risk society" corporate university problem to harass into silence researchers who uncover disturbing new evidence: https://t.co/4xWGfK4cG0— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 7, 2018
Monday 4 June 2018
Not an obscure writer on forest trees at all
Here, in this one further example, we see Matthew's (1831) book (which contains the original conception of macro evolution by natural selection) cited and praised in relation to information about spreading soot around plants to improve their growth. My book (Sutton 2014 & 2017) on the topic reveals that years before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original breakthrough ideas without citation that Matthew was read and cited many times, not only in the Encyclopedia Britannica, but at least 25 times, seven by naturalists, four of whom (Loudon, Chambers, Selby and Jameson) were at the epicentre of their influence.
The Gardener's Magazine and Register of Rural & Domestic Improvement, (1837) Volume 3. pp 517-518
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_TdNAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA518&dq=matthew+naval+timber+fertilizer+charcoal&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIjqfhmbvbAhWLKsAKHQqVAo0Q6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=matthew%20naval%20timber%20fertilizer%20charcoal&f=false
The Daily Mail On Matthew 2018
4th June 2018, The Daily Mail hails Patrick Matthew as an unsung hero whose ideas Darwin replicated 4 years after the Scottish Daily mail broke the story of my original discovery who Darwin know who really did read Matthew's breakthrough https://t.co/QlQKUHhQJH pic.twitter.com/4P2vkDZuP2
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 4, 2018
Big Data IDD Method Metrics
Some informative metrics are perfectly harmless and have no silly-billy backfire policy implications whatsoever. https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/nyi5LxjIeG
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 4, 2018