Perhaps VIP in this Oxford University Press series stands for "Very Important Plagiarists" in the Darwin case? https://t.co/QEWe7wEkpF pic.twitter.com/tI5c8G5bO9
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 27, 2017
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Monday 27 February 2017
Very Important Plagiarists
Wednesday 22 February 2017
Matthew Mocked "God"
Home https://t.co/EEQRXGvTPw pic.twitter.com/5r298vGWAQ
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 23, 2017
No Darwin Medal for anyone proving Darwin a liar and fraudster
And where's my Darwin Medal @SteveHall5582 for my research that proves Darwin lied about the origination of the theory of natural selection? pic.twitter.com/BXO6QsiMCm
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 22, 2017
Tuesday 21 February 2017
What's wrong with natural science?
.@TheSocReview Not whilst esteemed institutions of natural science promote & reward plagiarists & abuse originators https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/FyPbzHl2vC
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 21, 2017
Monday 20 February 2017
On Corruption in the Darwin Industry and Royal Society
Ignoring completely the accepted Arago Ruling on first and foremost priority for a discovery going to whoever had their original discovery published first, the Royal Society awarded the Darwin medal, and its most prestigious Copley medal, to Wallace. Why? For replicating Matthew's (1831) prior-published theory in 1858 and for claiming it as his own. If that was not a corrupt act by the Royal Society then what is?
No one is ever going to win the Royal Society's Copley Medal now - never mind one of its Darwin Medals - for originally proving Matthew's book, containing the full theory of natural selection, was read and cited by Darwin's and Wallace's friends, influencers and editors and their influencer's influencers before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original conception and claimed to have done so independently of it. Just Google "On Knowledge Contamination" (put it in those speech quotes - its a simple Big Data trick) to find the peer reviewed truth of what has been discovered on this topic.
How can we ask the scientific community to stand up to Trump's anti-vaccination and anti-global warming claptrap when its most esteemed institution is corrupt?
In 1860, 157 years ago, Matthew wrote two letters - both published in the Gardener's Chronicle of that year - claiming his priority.
Darwin wrote to admit Matthew got the entire thing first - 27 years in published print (in 1831) before he and Wallace replicated the theory in their papers presented before the Linnean Society n 1858. Yet Darwin continued to call it "my theory" and lied by claiming no naturalist/no one at all had read Matthew's original ideas. Darwin wrote those falsehoods even though Matthew had prior- informed him of two naturists who did read his ideas pre-1858.
We know knewly know (Google 'Nullius in verba Darwin's greatest secret' to get the facts) that many of Darwin's and Wallace's friends, associates and influencers cited Matthew's book and mentioned his orignal ideas pre-1858 in published print. Selby - the editor of Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper cited Matthew's 1831 book in 1842. Chambers' - Wallace's greatest influencer and Darwin's associate and Correspondent pre-1858 (he authored the Vestiges of Creation in 1844) cited Matthew's book in 1832. there are many more I could mention.
Nevertheless - even despite what has been newly discovered about Matthew's prior-influence- the Arago Ruling was ignored by The Royal Society.
Before we can take on the likes of Donald Trump's tweets that vaccinations cause autism and global warming is a Chinese conspiracy (here), our esteemed institutions of science must first put themselves in order. We need an inquiry into the corruption that is the so-called Darwin Industry.
Sunday 19 February 2017
Darwin the Cowardly Plagiarist
https://t.co/dnLJaZ3vZF pic.twitter.com/bzGgmpGG1k
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017
On Corruption in the Darwin Industry
++Oxford University Press: "We have a problem"
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 22, 2017
The Royal Society" "What now?"
Oxford Uni Press: "It's with the truth"https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/gHY7Y2eLcS
++Confirmatory evidence, established by way of a most equistie telling question, that the Darwin Industry is corrupt: https://t.co/cFOKLMaYZD pic.twitter.com/xLrSp9rP0z
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 19, 2017
++@Criminotweet Looks like the v small book was a publisher's compression of other stuff. Not so much corrupt as lazy and dumb, I suspect
— Brian Deer (@deerbrian) February 19, 2017
++.@deerbrian Maybe not when you see it in context of Moore's de facto fact-denial behaviour in the national press: https://t.co/70ZRzXgAuL pic.twitter.com/lgOB3x2LMg
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017
It's time we learned to distinguish establishment cover-ups from unevidenced conspiracy theories. Both do exist! https://t.co/FZs1Iqew3j pic.twitter.com/zG7hn9GxDL
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 19, 2017
Saturday 18 February 2017
On Knowledge Contamination
Proof of the knowledge contamination concept as views of my article on that topic march towards 10,000: https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nyGiEg1Ykl
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 18, 2017
The 4-U's of Research
@BiologiaPensamt 1. Determine if it really exists (Published Darwinite fact denial behaviour is proven to exist): https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/JQTK5P4VLD
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 17, 2017
Friday 17 February 2017
It has all Gone Trump Shaped for the Royal Society
Going Trump Shaped for the Royal Society @royalsociety
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) February 17, 2017
1. https://t.co/SBJwPkZ477
2, https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m
3, https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/ijcBKNBkPP
Sunday 12 February 2017
Darwin Day
++Happy Darwin Day SUCKERS!— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) February 12, 2017
1: https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI
2: https://t.co/DotiWqaMkbhttps://t.co/xBGGof5eY7#Darwin #PatrickMatthew pic.twitter.com/lj7s35Dwc4
And to raise questions about research integrity. https://t.co/yksOVd2tEX— Robert Dingwall (@rwjdingwall) February 12, 2017
++
"No one will EVER win the Nobel Prize
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 12, 2017
For proving
Darwin lied and Plagiarized."https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
It's too embarrassing for science pic.twitter.com/7ULsyNTDHe
Saturday 11 February 2017
Mythbusting
Just ordered copy of this book. I see it very kindly mentions the spinach mythbust @joeschwarcz . I have another one https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/APHQy7x4AP
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 11, 2017
Saturday 7 January 2017
Why?
"You stepped out of your old life into a fight that might not be winnable in your lifetime. What happened?" (a) = .https://t.co/6x3GgP2Jja pic.twitter.com/TDCkW1gapp
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) January 8, 2017
Friday 30 December 2016
Plagiarism
On Plagiarism: A strangely unexplored area of criminology
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 30, 2016
1. https://t.co/JUd91nR87p
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
3.https://t.co/SXiHqXQlsx pic.twitter.com/kNXfK8iWnH
Tuesday 27 December 2016
Today in 1831
Today in 1831 Darwin sailed on the Beagle. But.Matthew had already conceaved macroevolution by natural selection https://t.co/ldMK5Ipfqu pic.twitter.com/ljGZ3fFGpY
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 27, 2016
Friday 23 December 2016
Christmas Day 1859: Is Darwin Drunk Before Dinner?
'Subsequent to his successful manipulation of Hooker and Lyell in 1858, to ensure that Wallace did not get his priority over him, the following year, and just weeks before defending his priority to Baden Powell in 1859, Darwin writes to Hooker on Christmas Day, 1859, to say that he has always strongly felt that no one should defend their priority (Darwin 1859b). Seemingly, this most weird letter is meant to be both appreciative and self-flattering that he manipulated Hooker and Lyell to do so on his behalf, even if that meant unethical conduct on their respective parts. We know that Darwin had a weirdly unethical mindset when it came to scientific priority, but in this case, one might wonder whether perhaps he had started just a tad too early on the mince pies, rum source, sherry and port, or perhaps he was using something stronger? Or perhaps there was simply something far more profoundly wrong with the moral wiring of his mind.'
Darwin was a serial liar who was in fact obsessed with slyly stealing priority from others for his own glorification. Years earlier he started a prolific letter campaign to try to get Royal Society and British Association for Advancement of Science to re-write the rules on priority for discovery changed so that mere replicators like he could claim priority for the prior-published discoveries of lesser known scientists. Those independently verifiable facts are here.
Below, you can see the facts of how Darwin blatantly and clearly lied in order to plagiarise by glory theft Patrick Matthew's original ans prior published conception of macroevolution natural selection.
The peer reviewed facts of Charles Darwin's lies and independently verifiable evidence he committed plagiarism, to effectively claim independent discovery of Matthew's prior-published hypotheses of the process of macro evolution by natural slection, can now be read in learned journals:
1. Here
2. Here
3. Far more details, evidence and context can be found in 'Nullius in Verba': Here
Thursday 22 December 2016
An interlude in social media with Darwinites
@DISSENTOFMAN @interUNFAO @intelligent50 No error in verifiable facts. The big error is to write fact denial statements in your own name. pic.twitter.com/ethenEtwvu
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 22, 2016
Wednesday 21 December 2016
What would your sandwich board say?
If everyone had to wear a billboard for one day every year, what would yours say? Here is mine. pic.twitter.com/v6eIQHZHhu
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 21, 2016
Monday 19 December 2016
More fact denial behaviour in social media captured for the historical record
++.@Lorienen @interUNFAO @DISSENTOFMAN Read facts. Perhaps you might then abandon the Darwin worship fact-denal cult: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/BLuO9TRfSX
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 19, 2016
The words you are reading here are 100% proven to exist. Look 100 times - count the number of times they disappear.: https://t.co/WOiVuLvCho
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 20, 2016
Kindle Notes on Nullius
Having your book on Kindle & Amazon is a great way to share the findings & ideas in it so others cans see for free: https://t.co/7kYjx0QF2D pic.twitter.com/V4GKTQVZYD
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 19, 2016