Get the low-down on mockery, tautology and the "Bellman's Fallacy". Here: https://t.co/iAnfYaOf8F pic.twitter.com/vSKZvNqRpZ
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 16, 2016
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Wednesday 16 November 2016
Laughing at Mockery, Tautology and the Bellman's Fallacy
Tuesday 15 November 2016
The BBC is not aware of the New Data yet. But they will be.
@Silverwriter Thanks. @BBCEarth historic data Wallace & Darwin probably read Matthew's Prior-published theory & lied https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/tkWX2xLOlD
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 15, 2016
Monday 14 November 2016
More Wiki Stupidity
Never having mistaken me for a hat, you may have mistaken me for a copy of the Origin of Species. Thankfully no more https://t.co/PmcPoLehB6 pic.twitter.com/BUc2qnb3Xa
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 14, 2016
Sunday 13 November 2016
Comments Section of: "No Fuller than Complete: Darwin’s Age Comes to an End", by Gregory Sandstrom
My comment in conversation with Gregory Sandstrom:
Errol Jones
.Scot emigree @C_MAlexander @TheScotsman @heraldscotland 3rd great Granddaughter Patrick Matthew passed away Friday: https://t.co/UcvzXEORDe pic.twitter.com/exFyeW1GG0
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 13, 2016
Veracity Counter Culture and Weird and Wonderful Blogs on Darwin's Plagiarising Science Fraud
++.I think we need new counter culture of veracity, to provide missing alt.future. Lack of which = HyperNormalisation https://t.co/mHQoLgTVuv https://t.co/vqzF7MuODH
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 13, 2016
+++Two weird & wonderful blogs on what is possibly the most massive science fraud of all:
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 13, 2016
1. https://t.co/sDW4VuwayY
2. https://t.co/zbnJjftf42 pic.twitter.com/OvXSStFBdL
@Dysology pic.twitter.com/Mx8vb9QJ0Y
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 13, 2016
Saturday 12 November 2016
Confirmatory Evidence for the Frozen Donkey Hypothesis
The Frozen Donkey Hypothesis is born of the implications of the obvious catastrophic extinction event impact of the New Data on Darwinist professional and amateur historians of science, who reveal by their plainly biased response to it, that they are necessarily concerned – if they are to remain so named Darwinists and not be re-born Matthewists – with ignoring the rational implications of the new disconfirming hard evidence for their prior soft knowledge beliefs in their namesake’s “independent” discovery of a prior published hypothesis that was read, and the book containing it cited, by naturalists who were Darwin’s admitted influencers and associates and correspondents- even though Darwin himself fallaciously wrote in 1860 that no naturalist known to him had read it.
See more on the hypothesis here.
See more on the New Data - here.
.@risengrisha @Yestoitok @DiscoveryCSC Thanks. Darwinites were warned of sadly inevitable Frozen Donkey Hypothesis: https://t.co/TnMtwezQbo pic.twitter.com/rmCPKtUvE9— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 12, 2016
Charles Darwin and the Daleks
The #Daleks have always been involved in holding back scientific progresshttps://t.co/WSHCuYYrBE pic.twitter.com/lKmtIdt8nE
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 12, 2016
Tuesday 8 November 2016
Excellent Research Resource Repository
A truly excellent resource!
Monday 7 November 2016
Desperate Darwinite Fairy Tale Telling and Shameless Fact Deletion
++WIKIPEDIA EDITOR FRAUD
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016
(1) Proof IT exits: https://t.co/HNpOaVkZIR
(2) Proof of Wikipedia's dishonest fact deletion: https://t.co/MD18ID52O5 pic.twitter.com/TfMpBNp7F4
.Silly Billy @TakeThatDarwin @Colossis2 Darwinists tell fairytales about facts. Read conclusions of REAL sceintists https://t.co/9VxVcVPCUq pic.twitter.com/1a9HJPJ1JM
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016
Friday 4 November 2016
More on Robert Chambers
Anonymous scare the establishment today. In first half of the 19h century one anonymously authored book did the same https://t.co/3v9BLiOAvQ pic.twitter.com/K3k4U2DNj7
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 5, 2016
In my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" I originally
revealed the New Data that bust the 155 year old expert 'knowledge claim' that no naturalist and no one known to Darwin read Matthew's (1831) prior-published original hypothesis of macroevolution by natural selection before Darwin and Wallace replicated it and failed to cite Matthew. Darwin excused that failure by claiming he independently conceived it and that no naturalist, and no one at all read Matthew's original ideas before 1860.
Darwin lied, because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that two naturalists had read his ideas and that his book was banned by Perth Library for its heresy on the origin of species. In reality, Nullius reveals 25 people cited Matthew pre-Darwin's and Wallace's replications of 1858, four were known to Darwin, he was influenced by three of them and one was the editor of Wallace's famous 1855 Sarawak paper on evolution. One was Robert Loudon - who edited two of Blyth's influential pre-1858 papers on natural selection. Blyth was Darwin's most prolific correspondent and informant. Loudon was a close friend of William Hooker - the father of Darwin's best friend, the highly influential botanist Joseph Hooker. Loudon had written in 1832 that Matthew appeared to have something orignal to say "on the origin of species" no less! Another naturalist who read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858 was Robert Chambers. He did so in 1832, and in the following decade went on to write The Vestiges of Creation - the book that "put evolution in the air" in the mid 19th century, and greatly influenced both Darwin and Wallace and paved the way for public acceptance of Darwin's (1859) book entitled the Origin of Species.
++
The disconfirmed fact believers of the Branch Darwinians can run but not hide. Nullius ranked 11 on Amazon: https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ … pic.twitter.com/WG6jsT1v5P— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 5, 2016
Thursday 3 November 2016
Creationists fear Matthew and are fact denying about his origination of macroevolution by natural selection
.@BiologiaPensamt @ShareThis Proof article completely wrong & why a creationist has motive to fact deny Matthew's origination pre Darwin pic.twitter.com/v6rPeVmjq9— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 3, 2016
Origin of the term Darwinist
Darwinists think "Darwinist" was coined by creationists as term of abuse. But Darwinists are dreadful at history: https://t.co/X44f4ga0BT pic.twitter.com/qteg5PyxKH
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 3, 2016
Wednesday 2 November 2016
Applied Criminology
+++@James_Treadwell Many thanks.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 2, 2016
Two new articles on the way. Meanwhile post telegraph:
1. :https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nKdJd5NHW6
++. Also by Sagan: @wgugg @michaelshermer @C_Darwin_OFB @WallaceFRS https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/RDg67Fo0fq
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 1, 2016
Charles Darwin's Lying Plagiarism Has Dragged Science into the Gutter https://t.co/RvL0yfkMp6 : pic.twitter.com/n88Th5qcna
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 2, 2016
Tuesday 1 November 2016
One Stupid Scholarly "Expert" at a Time
Tackling - one at a time - the last bastions of "expert" scholarly stupidity: https://t.co/dLa68m8PSH pic.twitter.com/KnRkb0YUGk
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016
Kuhn was right about resistance to paradigm changing discoveries
Kuhn was absolutely right:
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016
Fierce 'fact denial' resistance to paradigm changing discoveries: SEE: classic examplehttps://t.co/BwSq1I5QF8 pic.twitter.com/FNmfLq2YIf
Sunday 23 October 2016
Dr Mark Griffiths is IN
New facts create eddy currents of veracity at the confluence of biology, sociology of science, criminology & psychology: HERE
Click the image below to enlarge for ease of reading
Saturday 22 October 2016
Extraordinarily Credulous Darwinites
As the psychologist Patrizio E. Tressold (2011) reminds us
' “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” was a phrase made popular by Carl Sagan who reworded Laplace's principle, which says that “the weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness” (Gillispie et al., 1999). This statement is at the heart of the scientific method, and a model for critical thinking, rational thought and skepticism everywhere.'
It is extraordinary to claim that Darwin and Wallace independently conceived Matthew's prior published hypothesis of macro evolution by natural selection, because new evidence proves that Darwin's and Wallace's friends and influencers and their influencer's influencers read Matthew's prior publication containing that orignal hypothesis and then cited the book containing it before either of those replicators put so much as a pen to private notebook on the topic. If. under such conditions for knowledge contamination, Darwin and Wallace conceived Matthew's prior published and cited hypothesis independently of that publication, then that is something remarkably unlikely, because it is completely without the remotest parallel in the history of scientific discovery.
Get the independently verifiable facts. HERE
@mpigliucci @stefanako71 @DrMarkGriffiths Serious scientists take it seriously: https://t.co/Ea0I736oEk pic.twitter.com/VZsUjpojQq— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) October 22, 2016
Friday 21 October 2016
A Telling Silence
++Telling Silence on New Evidence that Darwin Was a Lying Plagiarist who stole entire hypothesis of Natural Selection: https://t.co/ZylqHJjxrR pic.twitter.com/hzLXQIa1hU
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 21, 2016
Take that Veracity: https://t.co/1QLZG7EGJW pic.twitter.com/uUEsjmFlAM
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 21, 2016
Friday 14 October 2016
Children are now Ahead of the Childish Myth Believing Royal Society
Especially incredibly bright primary school children in Scotland are ahead of the Royal Society on the facts https://t.co/pPgoyU5XDh pic.twitter.com/QDCgmiW3lW
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 14, 2016
The truth will always out in the end. But not before disgracefully fraudulent, fact denying and fact deleting Darwinitis have spree-shot themsleves in the butt-tocks for all eternity.