The #Daleks have always been involved in holding back scientific progresshttps://t.co/WSHCuYYrBE pic.twitter.com/lKmtIdt8nE
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 12, 2016
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Saturday 12 November 2016
Charles Darwin and the Daleks
Tuesday 8 November 2016
Excellent Research Resource Repository
A truly excellent resource!
Monday 7 November 2016
Desperate Darwinite Fairy Tale Telling and Shameless Fact Deletion
++WIKIPEDIA EDITOR FRAUD
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016
(1) Proof IT exits: https://t.co/HNpOaVkZIR
(2) Proof of Wikipedia's dishonest fact deletion: https://t.co/MD18ID52O5 pic.twitter.com/TfMpBNp7F4
.Silly Billy @TakeThatDarwin @Colossis2 Darwinists tell fairytales about facts. Read conclusions of REAL sceintists https://t.co/9VxVcVPCUq pic.twitter.com/1a9HJPJ1JM
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 7, 2016
Friday 4 November 2016
More on Robert Chambers
Anonymous scare the establishment today. In first half of the 19h century one anonymously authored book did the same https://t.co/3v9BLiOAvQ pic.twitter.com/K3k4U2DNj7
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 5, 2016
In my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" I originally
revealed the New Data that bust the 155 year old expert 'knowledge claim' that no naturalist and no one known to Darwin read Matthew's (1831) prior-published original hypothesis of macroevolution by natural selection before Darwin and Wallace replicated it and failed to cite Matthew. Darwin excused that failure by claiming he independently conceived it and that no naturalist, and no one at all read Matthew's original ideas before 1860.
Darwin lied, because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that two naturalists had read his ideas and that his book was banned by Perth Library for its heresy on the origin of species. In reality, Nullius reveals 25 people cited Matthew pre-Darwin's and Wallace's replications of 1858, four were known to Darwin, he was influenced by three of them and one was the editor of Wallace's famous 1855 Sarawak paper on evolution. One was Robert Loudon - who edited two of Blyth's influential pre-1858 papers on natural selection. Blyth was Darwin's most prolific correspondent and informant. Loudon was a close friend of William Hooker - the father of Darwin's best friend, the highly influential botanist Joseph Hooker. Loudon had written in 1832 that Matthew appeared to have something orignal to say "on the origin of species" no less! Another naturalist who read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858 was Robert Chambers. He did so in 1832, and in the following decade went on to write The Vestiges of Creation - the book that "put evolution in the air" in the mid 19th century, and greatly influenced both Darwin and Wallace and paved the way for public acceptance of Darwin's (1859) book entitled the Origin of Species.
++
The disconfirmed fact believers of the Branch Darwinians can run but not hide. Nullius ranked 11 on Amazon: https://t.co/JIdFnrcCVZ … pic.twitter.com/WG6jsT1v5P— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 5, 2016
Thursday 3 November 2016
Creationists fear Matthew and are fact denying about his origination of macroevolution by natural selection
.@BiologiaPensamt @ShareThis Proof article completely wrong & why a creationist has motive to fact deny Matthew's origination pre Darwin pic.twitter.com/v6rPeVmjq9— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 3, 2016
Origin of the term Darwinist
Darwinists think "Darwinist" was coined by creationists as term of abuse. But Darwinists are dreadful at history: https://t.co/X44f4ga0BT pic.twitter.com/qteg5PyxKH
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 3, 2016
Wednesday 2 November 2016
Applied Criminology
+++@James_Treadwell Many thanks.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) November 2, 2016
Two new articles on the way. Meanwhile post telegraph:
1. :https://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc
2. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6 pic.twitter.com/nKdJd5NHW6
++. Also by Sagan: @wgugg @michaelshermer @C_Darwin_OFB @WallaceFRS https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/RDg67Fo0fq
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 1, 2016
Charles Darwin's Lying Plagiarism Has Dragged Science into the Gutter https://t.co/RvL0yfkMp6 : pic.twitter.com/n88Th5qcna
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) November 2, 2016
Tuesday 1 November 2016
One Stupid Scholarly "Expert" at a Time
Tackling - one at a time - the last bastions of "expert" scholarly stupidity: https://t.co/dLa68m8PSH pic.twitter.com/KnRkb0YUGk
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016
Kuhn was right about resistance to paradigm changing discoveries
Kuhn was absolutely right:
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) November 1, 2016
Fierce 'fact denial' resistance to paradigm changing discoveries: SEE: classic examplehttps://t.co/BwSq1I5QF8 pic.twitter.com/FNmfLq2YIf
Sunday 23 October 2016
Dr Mark Griffiths is IN
New facts create eddy currents of veracity at the confluence of biology, sociology of science, criminology & psychology: HERE
Click the image below to enlarge for ease of reading