You couldn't make this up.
On the massive science fraud by plagiary that fooled the entire planet - spanning two centuries https://t.co/FaE7rsqAIG
— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) July 14, 2021
Facilitated by the "X-Club". Yes it really existed. You couldn't make this up: https://t.co/LdB7vBiQfL
List 2 of Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret (Sutton 2014) contained the name David Low as someone who was apparently first to be second with two apparently unique Matthewisms from Patrick Matthew's (1831) On Naval Timber and Arboriculture.
Here is some interesting information from Prof. David Low's 1859 obituary. Here.
DEATH OF PROFESSOR LOW
We regret to learn from the last number of the North British Agriculturist that David Low Esq late Professor of Agriculture in the University of Edinburgh is no more. Three or four years since he resigned his chair in consequence of the declining state of his health and was succeeded by John Wilson Esq who is personally known to many of our readers and who it will be recollected visited Canada during our lasť Provincial Exhibition at Hamilton and who has evinced on more than one occasion a desire to bring our productions under the favorable notice of the British public.
Mr Low it appears was a native of Berwickshire and his father was extensively engaged in the management of landed property and enjoyed a high reputation. His son soon manifested a disposition to follow his father's pursuits for which he afterwards showed the highest qualifications. He likewise took an active part in the management of his father's extensive farms in Berwickshire which was the means of greatly improving his knowledge of practical agriculture for which he was afterwards so distinguished.
In the year 1817 appeared Mr Low's first work entitled Observations on the present state of Landed Property and on the prosperity of the Landholder and Farmer. The termination of the war had greatly reduced prices and great agricultural distress was consequently felt. The treatise was characterised by mature judgment and marked a sympathy with the position of the tenant farmer and secured for the author an early and high reputation. In 1825 Mr Low removed to Edinburgh where he afterwards resided. In 1829 the Quarterly Journal of Agriculture was commenced mainly at his suggestion a work that has been since published in connection with the Transactions of the Highland Society which has done good service to the cause of British Agriculture generally and to which Mr Low was a regular and most valuable contributor. In 1831 he succeeded Mr Coventry as Professor of Agriculture in the University a post which he filled with distinguished honor and ability for near a quarter of a century.
In the Highland Society, Mr Low always took a warm interest and rendered it most important services during the greater portion of his life. He was successful in establishing an agricultural museum in connection with the University towards which he enlisted the aid of the Government and several private individuals contributing not a little himself.
The writings of Professor Low were numerous. Besides the treatise already mentioned and his numerous contributions to the Journal of Agriculture and the Transactions of the Highland Society he published in 1834 The Elements of Practical Agriculture a work of great and original merit which has gone through several editions and was soon translated both into French and German and highly appreciated on the continent. His large and costly treatise on The Breeds of the Domesticated Animals of the British Islands in two large quarto volumes appeared in 1842. It was illustrated with colored portraits of the animals painted by Mr Shiels for the museum the portraits reduced by Nicholson the price being necessarily high 16 guineas.The French Government immediately ordered its translation. In 1815 appeared a fuller treatise on the Domestic Animals than was contained in the expensive illustrated edition without plates which is the best work on the subject in the English language. Another work soon followed On Landed Property and the Economy of Estates a work which enters very fully into the principles and practices of territorial management. The first edition of an Inquiry into the nature of the Simple Bodies of Chemistry came out in 1844 containing many ingenious speculations which excited considerable curiosity and attention so that a third edition appeared in 1856.
Professor Low died in the 73rd year of his age. His character was high toned and unsullied his manners gentle and unassuming and his loss will be long felt by a very large circle of admiring friends and readers of his works. So long as the man of integrity and high principle is esteemed and venerated so long will the memory of David Low remain a bright example in the performance of duties which require a combination of such qualities as sound judgment and high moral rectitude
Darwin regularly contacted and visited the British Museum Library reading room (see https://archive.is/ux1kP) prior to plagiarising the theory of evolution by natural selection from Matthew's (1831) On Naval Timber and Arboriculture (NTA).
The Library of the British Museum held a copy of NTA in 1833. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Annual_List_Of_Donations_And_Bequests_To/FN5lAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=matthew+naval+timber+arboriculture&pg=PA75&printsec=frontcover
How many pacts have various societies made with the mad over the years? #APactWithMadness ?
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 8, 2021
Why do we do it? What's going on?
Facts on pact with madness made with vulnerable, pseudo-scholar, Darwin worshipping idiots https://t.co/RlqMoRc7wL .
Darwin stole the entire theory. pic.twitter.com/tFtoOyhaBs
Brian J Ford's @brianjford excellent book#Nonscience is about what is wrong with our universities, the managerialists running them and many of the incurious and conformist so-called “experts” who work in them.https://t.co/mNtGLTgRzF pic.twitter.com/Z8khbFMHjU
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 2, 2021
Darwin and Wallace lied and plagiarised. Publishers no longer have an excuse not to exercise due-diligence when publishing Darwin Industry books. Here.
3 expert peer reviewed journal papers on the power of Google #BigData & related search technology @ericfrodgers to be hugely disruptive in overturning long held sacred & much beloved science myths
1. https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE
2. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL
3. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
Like so many exploited by the Darwin Industry, deranged nutter Julian Derry is a fragile person whose grip on reality is extremely tenuous. In this respect, the Darwin Industry is very analogous to the Wellness Industry in that it has taken on a life of its own and is comprised of many publishers and authors all writing at great and compelling length to essentially promote and then defend it's very foundations, which are built on a lie. In the case of the Darwin Industry that lie is that Charles Darwin has priority over Patrick Matthew for Matthew's (1831) prior published complete theory of the natural process of selection; and on Darwin's 100% proven lies about Matthew's prior-readership.
Julian Derry weirdly has it preserved in his addled and malicious brain, like some nasty old rotten pickled egg, that I have claimed in some way that one of the missions/duties/orders of the Beagle was to search out for naval timber. I have never ever claimed any such thing anywhere. I've never seen any evidence for it. But poor Desperate Derry is a deranged serial liar and is guilty of so much libel he is really in for such forthcoming trouble with all his published serial lies.
Here is just one of Derry's typical harassment blogs publishing complete disinformation on behalf of the bent Darwin Industry, which hides behind vulnerable troll-losers like Derry, in desperation to hide the facts I uncovered and published on Darwin's plagiarism and associated serial lies in my book 'Nullius in Verba: Darwin's guilty secret (here).
I have legally, forensically, archived Derry's blog post like so many of his others: https://archive.is/4g5yp for future use and so that generations of future scholars can see solid evidence of what Kuhn meant by fierce resistance to paradigm change in science when it threatens cherished sacred-science beliefs.
It also appears Derry actually does not know the difference between a captains log and a published memoir that is not a published captains log. Not surprising though. Because Desperate Derry also can't tell fact from his deranged own fakery. He can't even tell the difference between his own fiction and reality.
In his raving bonkers jealous red foaming mouthed cyberstalking of all my Tweets, bitter and certainly twisted little Julian Derry can't even distinguish the difference between me merely openly reporting what some one told me in a private email after they supposedly made a request to the Admiralty to see the captain's log for the voyages of the Beagle, which Darwin was on (of which they say they were permitted to see and read and, they told me, they took notes of) and what I actually think is accurate or not, as the case may be regarding whether that actual log has ever been published anywhere, ever as a log. And, sadly, we all know what it means when a person cannot tell what is real from what is not.
You can read more of this Darwin Industry harassment nominal's raving bonkers malicious and obscene jealous behaviour here: https://patrickmatthew.com/book-reviews.html
By their proven fact-resisting behaviour, some members of
the Darwin Industry and some of its followers are engaged in what amounts to
science fraud, fraudulent historical revisionist behaviours and repeated
harassment in several ways, including but not limited to the following examples
of academic misconduct:
(1) Fact denial by brute censorship of independently
verifiable facts.
(2) Dismissing independently verifiable facts as a conspiracy
theory.
(3) Dismissing facts by refusing to engage with them.
(4) Dismissing major groups of verifiable facts by gleefully
disproving a single error elsewhere.
(5) Inventing completely made-up fake stories about Patrick
Matthew and/or his book.
(6) Repeat plagiarism of my research, amounting to academic
fraud, harassment, and serious academic misconduct.
(7) Publishing misinformation about me, my accredited
academic qualifications, research findings, peer reviewers, editors, and
professional publishers.
(8) Repeat workplace harassment by way of multiple malicious
poison-pen emails to managers and colleagues (serious academic misconduct and
possibly criminal behaviour).
(9) Harassment by malicious correspondence to the wider
community of local groups, government organisations, charities, funders,
editors, publishers, and journalists (possibly criminal behaviour and serious
academic misconduct).
Get the facts on PatrickMatthw.com
(10) Harassment by cyberstalking on social media, malicious
editing of Wikipedia pages and creating malicious blogsites publishing multiple
misinformation falsehoods (possibly criminal behaviour and serious academic
misconduct).
On their Patrick Matthew page and on the page they have on me Wikipedia publishes an embarrassment of multiple misinformation falsehoods
The latest is that my first edition e-book Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret was self published - HERE
It wasn't self published at all. My book was published by the American publisher Thinker Media as a "Thinker Book" It was not self-published, nor was it vanity published.
This image of the book on a Kindle proves it
I have several hobbies. My favourite is repairing and restoring antique violins. You can visit my blogsite on some good but less valuable student violins in my collection Here.
Hang on in there dear reader, there is an idea link too.
Hobbyists and professional luthiers have a disparaging acronym for poor quality violins. Namely, VSO, which is short for a Violin Shaped Object. A VSO essentially looks like a good violin, its strings can be tuned to correct pitch, and it can be played to produce a fair tune, but it is a pretender to the ‘real thing’. It does not have the wonderful resonant complexity of tone, brightness, brilliance, depth, colour, loudness, projection, focus, speed of response, sheer playability and wonderous balanced beautifulness of sound, appearance, eminence of tone woods, and artistic craft build-quality of a master violin.
Analogously, what we might call “The Darwin Theory” is like a
VSO. It is not a “Master Theory”. It has been cobbled together by cheapskate
corner cutters, duffers, bodgers and sometimes by fraudsters, then all packaged
and presented to appear as something it most definitely is not and can never be
improved to be.
The Darwin Theory emerges from and is supported by the Big
Data and other evidence in this book. The Darwin Theory is fraudulent under the
codified rules of scientific priority; rules which make the theory of
macroevolution by natural selection Matthew’s theory alone.
The Darwin Theory is not the theory of macroevolution by natural
selection.
The Darwin Theory is a quasi-supernatural theory shaped
delusion (TSD) made up by Darwin, his magical thinking Darwinites, and Wallace
apologists.
Following unique research findings, we can now see the Darwin
Theory for what it really is. It’s a fairy story, penned by Darwin and promoted
by his fanatics, in which King Darwin has no clothes, but his blind-sighted fans
just can’t see it.
The Darwin Theory can be summarised as follows:
Darwin and Wallace
had miraculous dual independent virgin conceptions of a prior published theory
that was read and cited in the publication record by their influencers and
their influencer’s influencers. Darwin miraculously re-shuffled the same four
words Matthew first used to name the theory and replicated the same examples to
explain it, one being the essential explanatory difference between artificial
and natural selection coming from the same prior-published paragraph containing
those same four essential words ‘natural process of selection’. And even
though, once confronted by Matthew in the press, Darwin told multiple lies
about the prior readership of Matthew’s theory and where in his book it is to
be found, these were magically not examples of Darwin lying, because Darwin,
being Darwin, was not a liar, even though he was.
Do you believe the Darwin theory is a master theory? Or do
you think it is a TSD? If the latter, whose delusion do you think it is? Mine? Or
that of the Darwin Industry?
