The Stone of Scone (Stone of Destiny) Returns to Scone Palace

 It's coming home, it's coming home, the Stone of Scone is coming home!

In the grounds of Stone Palace (on a Farm called Rome) Birthplace of the true father of the theory of evolution by natural selection Scotland has also found Patrick Matthew's grave in Errol Churchyard!

It's all coming home to Scotland.https://t.co/HFOMu4u85Y https://t.co/356X9xlzBc pic.twitter.com/QIX92LMmEO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 23, 2020

.

 

Blind Belief of Darwin Fanatics

 Sometimes believing is just believing

"Sometimes, believing is just believing."
Santa Clause (the Movie)

Darwin fanatics just believe - despite disconfirming historical evidence, newly unearthed, of his science fraud by plagiarism

Happy Christmas "ya filthy animals": https://t.co/8xWt2ilXnV pic.twitter.com/tUxcOkoQmc

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 20, 2020

The Darwin Legacy of Fake Facts

Get the facts on Darwin's great science fraud by glory theft, serial lying and plagiarism

The #ToffPandemic has been infecting our society and institutions with dishonest fake facts for hundreds of years. For example, landed gentry toff Charles Darwin married his cousin! Today their offspring's offspring control his fraudulent legacy with £££ https://t.co/xZYPlO4ppr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 13, 2020

 

. https://twitter.com/i/status/1338770383697276928

Charles Darwin. Why is he the most influential person in the entire history of the world? Ask the 96 thousandth 853rd most influential.

 

Darwin is ranked the most influential influencer of all time. But why?

The most influential person in the entire history of the World - Charles Darwin is only ranked 1st because he is actually the world's greatest plagiarist. At least that is true according to the 96,853 most influential person of all time: pic.twitter.com/mVG95pfret

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 9, 2020

.

Looking for Xmas gift for someone who hates cheats & liars? This true detective story could be perfect

"This behind-the-scenes portrayal will be fascinating to anyone who loves a true-life detective story, where in this case, the victim was the truth." https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 11, 2020

 

.

#ProtectScotland from lying and corrupt English toffshttps://t.co/RKbJV7ogAU pic.twitter.com/1ZiwOKMiE1

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 21, 2020

Misrepresentation of fact

 Great is the power of the pathological serial liar

On the power of Fake News, Serial Lying, and other Misrepresentations of Fact by nasty Charlatans, Glory Thieves, and Egomaniacal Con Artists. pic.twitter.com/sTt9lb8K2v

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 5, 2020

Quotes and Sayings on Charles Darwin's Plagiarism

 The cat is out of the bag on Darwin's proven plagiarism of the entire theory of evolution by natural selection  and there is no getting it back in

.

The stuff you find in the #globalvillage - This from "Quotes and sayings" website accompanied by some rather "saucy" #clickbait pictures (don't click those pictures) quoting from my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQThttps://t.co/TLsLqwKeqK pic.twitter.com/pRtLo6ffe0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 3, 2020

TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? Thierry Hoquet or True Concept but four-word shuffled plagiarised term?

To me, it looks on the face of it that a pertinent chapter (at least on the obvious issue of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism) is to be found in TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? by Thierry Hoquet pp. 67-96 2013). What is interesting is that in this publication Hoquet cites Matthew's original, and prior to Darwin's and Wallace's supposedly miraculous independent 1858 replication of Matthew's theory, coinage of the term "natural process of selection". Hoquet notes Darwin (1859) wrote 'process of natural selection' in his book The Origin of Species, but that  four-word shuffling of Matthew's term does not appear to interest him. 

Those questioning whether or not Darwin plagiarized Matthew, are of course alerted to the fact ignored by Hoquet that Darwin has originally four-word shuffled Matthew's original phrase into his own regeneration of it.

 In my book (Sutton 2017), I point out why a plagiarist of  Matthew's theory of evolution by natural selection would risk such a thing. My own guessed reason for that is because Darwin had no choice, because the theory is about (1) "selection" that is (2)"natural" (as opposed to artificial) and is a (3) "process".  Therefore, Darwin would have felt he had no choice but to regenerate by four-word shuffling Matthew's original term for the concept he plagiarized from him, otherwise Matthew's theory could not be explained as well as the originator explained it before Darwin stole it. 

NOTE: I am most grateful to Hugh Dower for for sharing the pdf containing Hoquet's publication.

TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? by Thierry Hoquet @HughDower @BiologiaPensamt

.....or "True Concept but four-word shuffled plagiarised term?"https://t.co/h6406hZeQF pic.twitter.com/KIrbTdDCXh

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 2, 2020

Darwin the thief's notebooks stolen, how ironic is that: Theft of a Theft

 We now know that it is beyond all reasonable doubt that Darwin (and Wallace) stole the entire theory of evolution by natural selection from its prior-published originator Patrick Matthew. You can't argue with that data -and that is plainly presented here in an exert  peer reviewed science article. A timeline of Darwin's and Wallace great theft by fraud is here and the whole story can be read in my book (here).

Today we learn that Darwin's notebooks, including the one with his twig of life (it's not a tree), have been stolen from Cambridge University (here).

So the headline should really be "Theft of a Theft".

The concept of a tree of life heuristic device, used to explain evolution was certainly not Darwin's origination either. Karl Ernst von Baer 1826 had drawn one and published one years before Darwin replicated the idea. See Brauckmann (2012)  Image below thanks to Brauckman here

.

Theft of a Theft. @LaxmiAggarwal1

How ironic is the theft of "Darwin the Thief's" plagiarising notebooks from Cambridge University?

1 BBC News https://t.co/wzpLztjVEF

2 Darwin's glory thieving plagiarism. Get the facts of his thieving science swindle https://t.co/oWgFTOn1XC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 24, 2020

The Danger of Appeals to Authority

 Too many so called experts are trained but not educated. Proper education teaches how to think and find things out for yourself.  

The lethal nonsense spread by #BonkersBoris and his so-called expert scientist Dr Jenny Death blindly spewing forth only what others above her said first

2. https://t.co/toOhkBJubW

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 23, 2020

Total Nonscience from the Natural History Museum

 Today's big news story is very old news

.

Fact is Patrick Matthew got it right about such major extinction events and Darwin got that totally wrong - which is about the only bit he never plagiarised from Matthew. Because Darwin wanted to please Charles Lyell who promoted: uniformitarianism theory https://t.co/4W0qlBAxt2

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) November 18, 2020