Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday 3 May 2018

Greedy Alfred Wallace shot 17 apes for their skins!

Letter to an author (sent today) : 


Hi [Name removed]

I enjoyed your article on Wallace shooting apes in Sarawak. I investigated his odd claim (unique in the history of both malarial fever and scientific breakthrough discovery) to have independently conceived the theory of macroevolution by natural selection whilst recovering from malarial fever in Sarawak. It turns out that the naturalist Selby - chief editor of the journal that published his famous Sarawak paper - had prior read and cited the book containing what the world's leading experts (including both Darwin and Wallace) admit contains the complete first publication of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection.  You can read the independently verifiable facts (and more besides on Darwin) in these open access peer reviewed scholarly articles and my book:

3. The method used to make these new discoveries: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66

Wednesday 2 May 2018

Disgusting Behaviour Facilitated by Wikipedia

+
Mike Sutton This dreadful behaviour (including a campaign of numerous malicious and malevolent emails sent to my employer and other academics (and more besides) including leading light members of the BSC) followed the BSC's expert peer reviewed publication of deeply disturbing new facts unearthed in the historic publication record on science fraud by plagiarism and lies - using a new method - (1) The new facts uncovered: http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf and (2) the method used to discover it (also expert peer reviewed in a scholalry journal) http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66
+

⚡️ “Stepping up to the plate” +

The Social Evolution of Plagiarism: Darwin's pigeons come home to roost

+
+
+
DISGUSTING ABUSIVE DEFAMATORY BEHAVIOUR ARCHIVED ON THE COMMENTS SECTION THE 'TIMES NEWSPAPER'S HIGHER EDUCATION' ("THES") BLOG SITE. THESE ABUSIVE AND HARASSING COMMENTS ARE POSTED THERE BY ONE PROLIFIC AND LONG SERVING WIKIPEDIA EDITOR OF WIKIPEDIA'S PATRICK MATTHEW PAGE AND THEIR MIKE SUTTON (CRIMINOLOGIST) PAGE. PERSISTENT AND PROLIFIC HARASSMENT FOLLOWS THE PUBLISHING OF SCHOLARLY JOURNAL EXPERT PEER REVIEWED PAPERS ON THE UNEARTHING OF DARWIN'S PLAGIARISM AND GLORY STEALING LIES http://archive.is/reG0s

THE WIKIPEDIA CULT PAGE ON THEIR REACTION TO THEIR OWN DETECTED PLAGIARISM

+

Tuesday 1 May 2018

Why Creationists and Muddle Headed Deranged and Conflicted Crypto-Christian Darwin Worshippers Despise Patrick Matthew


Don't be misled by desperate neerdowell unemployable pseudo scholarly closet-Christian nutters: Get the independently verifiable facts - that are as proven as fossils do exist in the geological strata - from the historical publication record:  Here

http://patrickmatthew.com/Did%20Matthew%20believe%20in%20intelligent%20design%3F.html
+

Now for something completely different.

When a wheelbarrow offers some light relief:


Sunday 29 April 2018

Getting the message across


On "Why scientists need to do more about research fraud" 
by Richard P Grant in the Guardian newspaper

  •  "The scientific fraudster...  lied and cheated their way to a prestigious position..."
  • "...they took resources that could have been used by someone else, someone who wasn’t a liar and a cheat."
  • "And until there is a change in culture such that people are encouraged to say, “Guys, this isn’t right” – such as I might have been a decade ago – there will continue to be high-profile cases of seriously damaging scientific fraud.
  • That’s not good for science, and it’s certainly not good for ordinary scientists."
As this expert peer reviewed science paper proves with independently verifiable data Charles Darwin was a liar and cheat and proven glory stealing plagiarist. Here. And Darwin was caught and proven a plagiarising science fraudster and serial liar with the hi-tech IDD mythbusting research method. See another expert peer reviewed paper on how it works and some examples of deeply entrenched natural science and social science myths that it recently busted Here .

Friday 27 April 2018

Divide and Rule: Social Scientists Isolate the Selfish Gene

+

Thursday 26 April 2018

DISGUSTING CYBERSTALKING BEHAVIOUR IS RATHER COMMON

Monday 23 April 2018

Independently verifiable facts in the historic publication record are facts and published proven lies are lies. Only an idiot or pathological liar can't tell one from another



The independently verifiable disruptively disturbing New Data facts have just spread to Tanzania. Watch out now for the "Knowledge Contamination" across the globe.

Sunday 22 April 2018

Friday 20 April 2018

Darwin Industry real ale

Photography (c) Andy Sutton
No matter how many pints of this good beer one drinks, it cannot transmute a prior published theory into one of Darwin's origin. Moreover, following responsible drinking guidelines one would have to give the Darwin Industry a considerable amount of cash, brain and liver damage for it to change Darwin's many proven lies about the true originator of natural selection - Patrick Matthew - into the "truth" as perceived only by a deranged Darwin worshipper.



+ +