Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Saturday, 2 July 2016

Myths about Darwin (No 2.) The 'Galapagos Conception Myth' and 'Notebooks Myth'

Continuing with the theme of myths about Darwin in the Oxford paperback "Darwin" by Jonathan
Howard

THE 'GALAPAGOS CONCEPTION' AND 'DARWIN'S NOTEBOOKS' MYTHS

On page 1 Howard writes "The theory of evolution started on the Beagle Voyage" and "Returning home, Darwin started a series of personal notebooks which reveals the earliest developments of the theory of the theory of evolution..."

This sort of misleading storytelling has led to the "Finches Supermyth" that Darwin understood finch beak evolutionary adaptation  - in fact he never did any such thing. Darwin returned home from the Beagle voyage in 1836 still believing that species were completely immutable

Darwin supposedly began his Zoonomia notebook in 1837 (although we have no external evidence for this - other than the dates Darwin wrote on his private essays and notebooks - and Darwin is a proven prolific liar). The examples in that notebook on natural slection relate to fruit trees - Patrick Matthew's area of expertise. By 1837 two naturalists had already cited Matthew's book in the literature: the famous and influential naturalist John Loudon - who was a major influence on Darwin and his friends and and closely connected to his inner circle and the naturalist Robert Chambers - who went on the write the hugely influential "Vestiges of Creation" (SEE SUTTON 2014 FOR THE NEWLY DISCOVERED  FACTS)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.