Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday, 10 August 2015

Darwin Deifying Trolls Respond to the New Data with Obscene Language

Foul Trolls Serve as Volunteer Shock-Troops for the Darwin Industry

According to Kuhn (1970 p. 62) the characteristics of paradigm changing discoveries include the:

 '... previous awareness of an anomaly, the gradual and simultaneous emergence of both observational and conceptual recognition, and the consequent change of paradigm categories and procedures often accompanied by resistance.'

Challenged by the logical scholarly demands of the New Data presented on PatrickMatthew.com some upset Darwinists are getting themselves into a proper old lather in the 'resistance' to the newly discovered facts. Here is the fact-led challenge they hate:

How on Earth did Darwin and Wallace discover Natural Selection independently of Matthew's prior published hypothesis of it; despite the newly discovered fact that they were influenced and facilitated on the same topic by naturalists they knew who had long before read and cited Matthew's book, which contains it? Moreover, why did Darwin lie when, contrary to what Matthew informed him, he wrote that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas before 1860? Furthermore, why, after Matthew informed him a second time of yet another naturalist who read his original ideas, did Darwin continue his lie that no one read Matthew's ideas from the third edition of the Origin of Species onward?

In response to the New Data demands on biased brains, this typical Darwinist worshiping troll displays wonderful unintended comic humour "i" .  Now that's one for posterity. The abusive specimen resorted to a typical torrent of foul-penned misogynistic  ("c-"word) abuse. The example of his/her craft below is actually publishable and worth a laugh.


Darwin Deifying Atheist Trolls Hate the New Data on Darwin and Matthew.

For another interesting example of 'resistance' see this one from a named academic - Professor Comfort - who was obviously very upset by my fact-led peer reviewed academic journal paper on his hero's fraud (See Sutton 2014 The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery)


No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Those who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realise Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.