Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday, 16 July 2018

Nullius in Verba

+

Thursday, 12 July 2018

On Harassment of Academics

Read my Amazon book review of Ernst's SCAM here


Saturday, 7 July 2018

Who Do We Think We Are? Big Data N=All and Mentions in Parliament Cited in Hansard


Is is interesting to see that the same Big Data technology that for the first time (Sutton 2014, 2017) detected Patrick Matthew's (1831) book and bombshell theory of evolution by natural selection being cited in the historic literature by Darwin's and Wallace's influencers and also by their influencer's influencers (all many years before Darwin's and Wallace's 1858 Linnean Society Scandal supposedly miraculous immaculate independent conception replications of the same theory) enables me to see that my Market Reduction Approach to theft and my name have been mentioned in UK Parliamentary answers. Moreover, it is very good to see that a number of my co-authors down the years are similarly mentioned in Hansard. Who do we think we are?

HANSARD (UK PARLIAMENT) MENTIONS

1. My Market Reduction Approach (MRA) and me (Mike Sutton) twice Here. Also  named once here for UK Government contract award (Both main mentions for research archived in full here and here and named for Govt. contract award here)

2. Paul Ekblom: Once Here (archived in full here)

3. Mike Levi three times Here

4. Mark Griffiths ten times Here
+

+

So who do YOU think YOU are?


Friday, 6 July 2018

Myth Busting, Plagiarism and Lie Detecting Big Data Criminology

In terms of myth busting long cherished science myths, Big Data technology led to the devastating new bombshell discovery that Darwin and Wallace committed the world's greatest science fraud by lies, plagiarism and glory theft of Patrick Matthew's prior-published theory, which their friends/editors/influencers and influencer's influencers read and cited and that Richard Dawkins never coined the term 'selfish gene' nor the concept that is now a biological meme, and so much more besides.

1. Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest Secret (Vol. 1 Paperback book).

2. The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery (Expert peer reviewed academic article).

3. On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis (Expert peer reviewed science journal article).

4. Using Date Specific Searches on Google Books to Disconfirm Prior Origination Knowledge Claims for Particular Terms, Words, and Names (Expert peer reviewed social science journal article) .


6 July 2018
Format: Paperback|Verified Purchase

This is a seminal work on Big Data. I have written on the topic myself with professor Mark Griffiths, who 
recommended the book to me.

Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier, the authors of ‘Big Data’, do an excellent job of telling us exactly 

what Big Data is and how what we currently have is rooted in historic exercises in trying to make sure that as far as
is possible N=all. Of course, N (the sample) seldom does equal all, but what we call Big Data gets substantially 
nearer to that than purposively limited statistical sampling.

What I most like about this book is the fact it provides so many examples of how Big Data reveals insights that could
not have been obtained in any other way. But most importantly, the authors then explain the importance of the 
results obtained. For anyone interested, as am I, in social network theory then pages 30-31 are a must read.

The last chapters of the book reveal the limitations of Big Data and the inherent danger of relying upon predictive 

algorithms – particularly in the fields of criminology, policing and criminal justice.

I cannot recommend the book more highly. Buy it. Read it. Think about it. Be enlightened. It might well change the 

way you think about data.

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

Childish Darwin and Wallace Worshippers Should Grow Up



Friday, 29 June 2018

BIG DATA IS VERY USEFUL

Tuesday, 26 June 2018

Linnean Society Scandal: Alfred R. Wallace the Very Silly Paranormal Believer, Anti-Vaxxer, Great Ape Killer, Myth Maker, Plagiarist, Extortionist and Fraudster. History Repeating Itself in 2018



In 1858, Darwin and Wallace had their papers on evolution by natural selection read before the Linnean Society and then published in its journal (see Darwin, C. R. and Wallace, A. R. 1858. 'On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection.' Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of London). Neither Darwin nor Wallace cited Patrick Matthew's (1831) book 'On Naval Timber and Arboriculture' prior publication of the entire theory they each replicated (which, following Matthew's protestations in 1860, each later admitted he had discovered and published in full). In addition to replicated terminology and highly idiosyncratic explanatory analogies (see Sutton 2014, Sutton 2017), Big Data research (see Sutton 2015) reveals many newly discovered routes of possible Matthewian knowledge contamination of Darwin's and Wallace's supposedly independent conceptions of Matthew's prior-published origination. Ludicrously, Wallace - the species dealer and great ape killer  who, incidentally, stupidly believed adamantly in ghosts , the veracity of seances and even joined the pseudo-scientific anti-vax movement - claimed his Eureka moment came during a bout of malarial brain fever (which is just totally ridiculous) and, the Galapagos Islands Finches Beaks Myth being completely debunked by Sulloway (1982), we in fact know that Darwin claimed that his conception came about from nothing more than a slow synthesis from reading the prior-publications of others. And today we newly know, thanks to my discovery, that those others include Robert Chambers - a naturalist geologist and publisher who cited Matthew's 1831 book and then his later book 'Emmigration Fields' before writing his own guide on arboriculture and then a highly influential bestseller book on evolution 'The Vestiges of Creation'  (see Sutton 2015), a book which obsessed Darwin and, in his own words, most influenced Wallace.

Thanks to my research with the Big Data IDD method we now newly know that, as opposed to the old Darwinite tale - started as a plagiarising glory theft lie told by Darwin to deny what he had been told by Matthew - of none, that a total of seven naturalists read and cited Matthew's (1831) book pre-1858 (See Sutton 2015 for an expert peer reviewed science journal article to get the independently verifiable New Data).

Wallace's original letter (here) was doctored in his autobiography to remove the incriminating words ‘immediately’ and ‘assistance’. Get the story here.



The Linnean Society has a history of facilitating plagiarism debacles

In a recent Linnean Society paper Dagg, whose blogs and online comments reveal he is apparently rather obsessed with  several different areas of my work and read it all on this topic from 2014 onward - because he has commented on it ad nauseum - plagiarised my original (Sutton 2014a, 2014b) discovery that in 1842 Selby (Wallace's  1855 Sarawak paper editor) read and cited Matthew's (1831) prior published discovery of macroevolution by natural selection  He then bragged on Wikipedia (of all the seedy pseudo-scholarly places) to the malicious cyber stalker Derry that he failed to cite me.

Scholars interested in plagiarism and other academic misconduct can find the archived records of this shameful published behaviour and a great deal more on the relevant page on the Patrick Matthew website (here). Please be cautioned dear readers, because that page on PatrickMatthew.com contains an imbedded tweet and links to the Times Higher Education website archive of obscene abusive misogynist and anal insertion language published by Derry, who - incidentally - was dismissed from Edinburgh university for constantly weirdly harassing a young female teacher and many other people in Scotland, and officials of the National Lottery Heritage fund, for their association with my original new IDD Big Data discoveries about Patrick Matthew. As the PatrickMatthew.com page on Dawinite abuse and harassment reveals Derry has now escalated his weirdly obsessive cyberstalking harassment from harassing anyone who dares to write a positive review of my book to bombarding my friends, associates and leading criminologists and other academics with poison pen emails (some containing abuse language - many have been forwarded to me pending legal action) to now harassing one of my young female PhD students and also my co-author on the IDD method Professor Mark Griffiths. In his Linnean Society plagiarising paper Dagg thanks Derry for his help! In his Linnean Journal article, Dagg also thanks Mike Weale for his help. Weale, like Derry has attempted, also with absolute zero success, to harass me into silence on the significance of the New Data - and how other Darwinite academics have dealt with it badly by resigning from the editorial board of a science journal that published it - by emailing senior management at my university with ludicrous and childish malicious accusations. I will be addressing all these highly embarrassing disreputable issues before the press, academics and on camera in December 2018. See the embedded tweet below for details.
+
WALLACE WAS CLEARLY A CREDULOUS IDIOT (just like all the daft-as-a-brush scientists who unquestioningly swallowed his malarial fever cognitive enhancement rubbish), HE NOT ONLY BELIEVED IN GHOSTS AND SEANCES BUT WAS ALSO AN ARDENT PSEUDO SCHOLARLY ANTI-VAXXER

"Wallace's statistics seemed impressive but the committee members found numerous errors that seemed unworthy of someone of Wallace's reputation. Not only did Wallace and his fellow anti-vaccinationists ignore statistics that failed to support their view but many of the statistical tables were highly selective (doubly embarrassing since Wallace had accused the pro-vaccinationists of doing the same thing).Wallace was caught off-guard by the findings and was forced to admit that many of the statistics that he had presented were worthless." 

 "Even in the 20th century, anti-vaccination societies continued to proliferate and attracted numerous "star" supporters including Wallace and George Bernard Shaw (who wrote that vaccination was "a particularly filthy piece of witchcraft"), as well as health faddists, anti-vivisectionists, trade unionists, etc."

 (ref: Providentia)
+

+
+
+
+


+

Wednesday, 20 June 2018

A. R. Wallace the ludicrous and delusional plagiarizing tableturner

Monday, 18 June 2018

Facts are facts

+ +

Friday, 15 June 2018

The story of a malicious academic vendetta is to be told

+