Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday, 20 June 2018

A. R. Wallace the ludicrous and delusional plagiarizing tableturner

Monday, 18 June 2018

Facts are facts

+ +

Friday, 15 June 2018

The story of a malicious academic vendetta is to be told

+

Wednesday, 13 June 2018

Big Data, Evolution of Human Thought, Spread of Ideas and Evidence for Plagiarism

+
+ +

Saturday, 9 June 2018

The Linnean Journal Scandal: A Tale of Stalking, Intimidation and Plagiarism

+
I HAVE A SIMILAR STORY OF NASTY, MALICIOUS VENDETTA HARASSING AND INTIMIDATION  OF UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND TOP PROFESSORS  TO TELL AND I WILL BE TELLING IT ALL IN DECEMBER 2018  (SEE DETAILS)
+
+
+
+
+
+

Friday, 8 June 2018

Google A.I is Reducing Google Functionality


Some peer reviewed papers on the scandal and what I uniquely found with the IDD method

1. http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf

2. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

+

Wednesday, 6 June 2018

The Matthew, Darwin and Wallace Linnean Society Scandal: A Most Unsettling Science Story

Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier (2013, p. 78), in their excellent book 'Big Data', explain what data is:

"To datafy a phenomenon is to put it in a quantified format so it can be tabulated and analysed."

That is exactly what I did in 2013 when I originally unearthed the fact, and published it in 2014 in my book 'Nullius in verba: Darwin's greatest secret' and a peer reviewed article, that besides Loudon (a naturalist) six other naturalists, out of a total of 25 people - many of whom were agriculturalists -  all of them (apart from Loudon) originally unearthed by me, cited Matthew's (1831) book before Darwin's and Wallace's Linnean Society journal replication of his theory without citation.

Prior to my research, the world's leading Darwin scholars, including Royal Society Darwin Medal winners de Beer and Mayer, wrote in esteemed scholarly published texts that they believed that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas before Darwin and Wallace replicated them in 1858. I bust that beloved science myth by identifying seven naturalists who did. Six of the seven are my original discoveries.

Therefore, when Dagg used my data on Selby in the Linnean Journal in 2018 without citing me as its discover it is my opinion that he plagiarised it. More so, by dong that he has given the impression in the Linnean Journal that he discovered it first. Moreover, Dagg knew that I did. But I published it first and Dagg well knows that fact because he has been obsessing about my work in this area and obsessing about my work on other unrelated topics in his online publications since 2014. On this serious issue, the tweets in this blog post direct you to an earlier longer post that provides all the details in this latest scene in the Matthew, Darwin and Wallace Linnean Society Scandal.


+
+
+
+

On camera, public meeting, press and senior academics present:



Monday, 4 June 2018

Not an obscure writer on forest trees at all

In my research on Matthew I have proven many times that contrary to the Darwinite myth, he was not simply an unread obscure writer on forest trees.

Here, in this one further example, we see Matthew's (1831) book (which contains the original conception of macro evolution by natural selection) cited and praised in relation to information about spreading soot around plants to improve their growth. My book (Sutton 2014 & 2017) on the topic reveals that years before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's original breakthrough ideas without citation that Matthew was read and cited many times, not only in the Encyclopedia Britannica, but at least 25 times, seven by naturalists, four of whom (Loudon, Chambers, Selby and Jameson) were at the epicentre of their influence.

The Gardener's Magazine and Register of Rural & Domestic Improvement, (1837) Volume 3. pp 517-518

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_TdNAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA518&dq=matthew+naval+timber+fertilizer+charcoal&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiIjqfhmbvbAhWLKsAKHQqVAo0Q6AEILDAA#v=onepage&q=matthew%20naval%20timber%20fertilizer%20charcoal&f=false



The Daily Mail On Matthew 2018

Big Data IDD Method Metrics