Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday, 20 March 2019

Hypocrisy in the Scientific Establishement

The likes of the Linnean Society and Royal Society need to quit fact denying and giving the sly public schoolboy silent treatment to protect the reputation of the privately schooled and landed gentry plagiarist Charles Darwin. Their behaviour is hypocritical in light of the endemic problem of plagiarism in our universities.


Tuesday, 19 March 2019

The Establishment Run by Useless Public Schoolboys

Look at who has - and is to this day - seeking to bury the truth about the origination of the theory of evolution by natural selection by the seditious and heretical Chartist, Patrick Matthew. They are the overprivileged incompetent products of the British public school system and their lickspittle credulous toadies. Why? Because Matthew wrote against the likes of them. He saw them as a form of damaging artificial selection that prevents the best people in the UK from making their best contribution to society. We continue to see the damage this "idiot class" causes in Parliament to this day.





More from Matthew (1831) here. But his book is run through with anti-upper class politics, linked to his theory of  what he coined 'The Natural Process of Selection." So named because it is natural, a process and involves selection in nature compared to artificial selection by human culture. That is surely why Darwin saw it as essential to steal the very same four words and to try to conceal his fraud by originally shuffling them to "process of natural selection." And that is why Darwin also saw it as necessary to steal Matthew's original analogy between artificial selection and natural selection in trees grow in nurseries versus those grown in nature.

Don't take my word for it. Get the independently verifiable facts, not the public schoolboy establishment nonsense. Get those peer reviewed verifiable facts HERE in a scientific journal as a good place to start.

Monday, 18 March 2019

Ahhh Coincidence!

Of course coincidences happen. I think the Dutch prime Minister's adoption of my prior Monty Python Black Knight analogy for the UK Prime Minister's Brexit deal is probably a coincidence. See tweet below:



 But what if the Dutch PM was to repeat many, many more of the original ideas in my tweets? What if his known influencers and their influencers were to cite my tweets? What if he was to take my original and prior published Market Reduction Approach and call it his own? What if he three-word shuffled my original name for it to 'Reduction, Market Approach"? Any reasonable person would then assume I have in some way (directly or indirectly) knowledge contaminating his brain with my own. Moreso, I'm told I have a Dutch fan club - via this comment reply to the latest review of my book Nullius.

"In my opinion, your review of Sutton's book is balanced and correct.
In our Dutch Sutton-fanclub we sometimes do not call him Mike Sutton but Mike Tyson, because he single handedly out-argued an army of neo-darwinists."

As opposed to a large number of mere multiple coincidences, I think on the weight of evidence that it is quite reasonable to argue that on the balance of reasonable probability that Matthew did indeed knowledge contaminate both Darwin and Wallace with his prior-published original theory of what he uniquely called the "natural process of selection" and Darwin originally called, by four words shuffling, the "process of natural selection". There are so many, many more original Matthewian replications by Darwin and Wallace, and by their proven influencers, who actually cited Matthew's (1831) book, On Naval Timber and Arboriculture years before Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic decades later, evidencing prior-influence on the brains of Darwin and Wallace. One who cited Matthew's book back in the 1830s was living in Holland and cited it in Dutch! It is all this newly unearthed data, found with the Big Data IDD method, that reveals these unwelcome, disruptive, facts. See my peer reviewed article, which reveals all with independently verifiable evidence form the historic publication record: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05
.
.

Sunday, 17 March 2019

Propaganda in science

.

Saturday, 16 March 2019

Don't be a Darwin: Don't steal the work and ideas of others, claim it as your own and then lie when challenged on it!

Don't be a copycat! Don't be a Darwin, or else you will look a proper old Charlie.

Student's and other scholars and writers beware. We never had the technology to catch Darwin until the 21st century (see Sutton 2014 and 2018). But if you do what he did you will be caught and humiliated.


Friday, 15 March 2019

Darwin Trolls

From a topographical ocean of Charles Darwin superfan obsession, malicious activities, stalking, plagiarism and other idiocy


Thursday, 14 March 2019

Hilarious Linnean Society: Where do they get the brassneck?

Wednesday, 13 March 2019

The Linnean Society is Disgraceful: Series of Scandals

Tuesday, 12 March 2019

Plagiarism, Repeatedly, Facilitated by the Linnean Society

This will go down in history as the thing that quite rightfully exposed what the Linnean Society and its Journal represent


Monday, 11 March 2019

Darwin's Cat is Out of the Bag